Advertisement

The Importance of Visual Literacy: An Analysis of Potential Obstacles for Romanian Students in the Completion of IELTS Academic Writing Task 1

  • Marina-Cristiana Rotaru
Chapter
Part of the Multilingual Education book series (MULT, volume 27)

Abstract

IELTS seems to have become one of the most frequently taken English tests by Romanian students aiming to study abroad. While linguistic competence is indispensable for success, it is not sufficient to guarantee that the exam will be passed with the recommended band scale. Sustained training focused on the types of task characteristics of the four skills (Listening, Reading, Writing and Speaking) is essential for achieving a good score in the test. The IELTS Academic Writing Task 1, based on graph analysis and interpretation, is one of those tasks that require specialized training. In this case, linguistic competence needs to be doubled by the ability to understand and represent information in the form of graphs, known as graphicacy. Although Romanian school curricula introduce pupils from all grades to various forms of graphic representation, Romanian students do not get enough training in graph analysis as required by an IELTS exam because this specific competence is not particularly envisaged by the national curriculum for English as a foreign language. Deciphering a graph and translating the lines and dots into words presuppose “obstacles” such as the use of appropriate language, conciseness and time limit, to mention but a few.

Keywords

Graph analysis Graphicacy Visual literacy IELTS 

References

  1. About ACRL (Association of College and Research Libraries). The official website of the American Library Association. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/aboutacrl
  2. ACRL Visual Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education, approved by ACRL Board of Directors. (2011). The official website of the American Library Association. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/visualliteracy
  3. Brumberger, E. (2011). Visual literacy and the digital native: An examination of the millennial learner. Journal of visual literacy, 30(11), 19–47 Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bullon, S. (managing editor). (2006). Longman exams dictionary. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
  5. Dillashaw, F. G., & Okey, J. R. (1980). Test of the integrated science process skills for secondary sciences students. Science Education, 64(5), 601–608 Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eva Brumberger. The official website of Arizona State University. Retrieved from https://isearch.asu.edu/profile/2000595
  7. Friel, S. N., Curcio, F. R., & Bright, G. W. (2001). Making sense of graphs: Critical factors influencing comprehension and instructional implications. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(2), 124–158 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hailey, D., Miller, A., & Yenawine, P. (2015). Understanding visual literacy: The visual thinking strategies approach. In D. M. Baylen & A. D. Alba (Eds.), Essentials of teaching and integrating visual and media literacy (pp. 49–73). Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Harrison, M., & Whitehead, R. (2006). IELTS practice tests with key. Andover: Heinle, Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  10. Hattwig, D., Bussert, K., Medaille, A., & Burgess, J. (2013). Visual literacy standards in higher education: New opportunities for libraries and student learning. Libraries and the Academy, 13(1), 61–89 Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  11. IVLA History. (2011). The official website of the International Visual Literacy Association (IVLA). Retrieved from http://ivla.org/new/ivla-history/
  12. Kellner, D. (1998). Multiple literacies and critical pedagogy in a multicultural society. Educational Theory, 48(1), 103–122 University of Illinois.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kosslyn, M. S. (1985). Graphics and human information processing: A review of five books. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 80(391), 499–512 New York: American Statistical Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kosslyn, M. S. (2006). Graph design for the eye and mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. May, P. (2010). IELTS practice tests with explanatory key. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Meyer, J., Shinar, D., & Leister, D. (1997). Multiple factors that determine performance with tables and graphs. Human Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 39(2), 268–286 Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Padilla, M. J., McKenzie, D. L., & Shaw, E. L. (1986). An examination of the line graphing of students in grades seven through twelve. School Science and Mathematics, 86, 20–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Programa şcolară Limba şi Literatura Română. Clasa a X-a. Ciclul Inferior al Liceului. (2009). The school curriculum for Romanian language and literature. Grade X. The official website of the Institute of Educational Sciences of Romania. Retrieved from http://programe.ise.ro/Portals/1/Curriculum/Progr_Lic/LC/Limba%20si%20literatura%20romana_clasa%20a%20X-a.pdf
  19. Programă Şcolară pentru Clasa a IX-a. Ciclul Inferior al Liceului. Biologie (2004). School curriculum for grade IX. The lower cycle of high school. Biology. The official website of the Institute of Educational Sciences of Romania. Retrieved from http://programe.ise.ro/Portals/1/Curriculum/Progr_Lic/MS/Biologie_clasa%20a%20IX-a.pdf
  20. Programa şcolară pentru disciplina Biologie, clasele V–VIII (2017). The school curriculum for Biology, grades V–VIII. The official website of the Institute of Educational Sciences of Romania. Retrieved from http://programe.ise.ro/Portals/1/Curriculum/2017progr/27-Biologie.pdf
  21. Programa şcolară pentru disciplina Fizică, clasele VI–VIII (2017). The school curriculum for Physics, grades VI–VIII. The official website of the Institute of Educational Sciences of Romania. Retrieved from http://programe.ise.ro/Portals/1/Curriculum/2017progr/25-Fizica.pdf Google Scholar
  22. Programa Şcolară pentru Disciplina Limba Modernă 1, Clasele a V-a – a VIII-a (2017). The school curriculum for the first modern language. The official website of the Institute of Educational Sciences of Romania. Retrieved from http://programe.ise.ro/Portals/1/Curriculum/2017-progr/19-Limba%20moderna1.pdf
  23. Programa şcolară pentru disciplina Limba şi Literatura Română, clasele a V-a – a VIII-a. (2017). The school curriculum for Romanian language and literature, grades V–VIII. The official website of the Institute of Educational Sciences of Romania. Retrieved from http://programe.ise.ro/Portals/1/Curriculum/2017-progr/01-Llimba%20si%20literatura%20%20romana%20materna.pdf
  24. Programa şcolară pentru disciplina Matematică, clasele V–VIII (2017). The school curriculum for Mathematics, grades VI–VIII. The official website of the Institute of Educational Sciences of Romania. Retrieved from http://programe.ise.ro/Portals/1/Curriculum/2017-progr/24-Matematica.pdf
  25. Programă Şcolară. Matematică. Clasa a IX-a. Ciclul Inferior al Liceului (2009). The school curriculum for Mathematics, grade IX. The lower cycle of high school.The official website of the Institute of Educational Sciences of Romania. Retrieved from http://programe.ise.ro/Portals/1/Curriculum/Progr_Lic/MS/Matematica_clasa%20a%20IX-a.pdf
  26. Programe Şcolare pentru Ciclul Superior al Liceului. Matematică. Clasa a XI-a. (2006). School curricula for the upper cycle of high school. Mathematics. Grade XI. The official website of the Institute of Educational Sciences of Romania. Retrieved from http://programe.ise.ro/Portals/1/Curriculum/Progr_Lic/MS/Matematica_programa%201_clasa%20a%20XI-a_a%20XII-a.pdf
  27. Programe Şcolare pentru Clasa a IX-a. Ciclul Inferior al Liceului. Limba Engleză. (2004). School curricula for grade IX. The lower cycle of high school. English language. The official website of the Institute of Educational Sciences of Romania. Retrieved from http://programe.ise.ro/Portals/1/Curriculum/Progr_Lic/LC/MOD/Limba%20engleza%201_3_clasa%20a%20IX-a.pdf
  28. Programe Şcolare pentru Clasa a X-a. Ciclul Inferior al Liceului. Fizică. (2004). School curricula for grade X. The lower cycle of high school. Physics. The official website of the Institute of Educational Sciences of Romania. Retrieved from http://programe.ise.ro/Portals/1/Curriculum/Progr_Lic/MS/Fizica_clasa%20a%20X-a.pdf
  29. Programe Şcolare pentru Clasa a X-a. Ciclul Inferior al Liceului. Matematică. (2004). School curricula for grade X. The lower cycle of high school. Mathematics. The official website of the Institute of Educational Sciences of Romania. Retrieved from http://programe.ise.ro/Portals/1/Curriculum/Progr_Lic/MS/Matematica_clasa%20a%20X-a.pdf
  30. Programe şcolare. Chimie. Clasele a VII-a – a VIII-a. (2009). School curricula. Chemistry. Grades VII–VIII. The official website of the Institute of Educational Sciences of Romania. Retrieved from http://programe.ise.ro/Portals/1/Curriculum/Progr_Gim/MS/Chimie_clasele%20a%20VII-a%20-%20a%20VIII-a.pdf
  31. Roth, W. M., & McGinn, M. (1997). Graphing: Cognitive ability or practice? Science Education, 81, 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Roth, W.-M., Pozzer-Ardenghi, L., & Han, J. Y. (2005). Critical graphicacy: Understanding visual representation practice in school science. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Simkin, D., & Hastie, R. (1987). An information-processing analysis of graph perception. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 454–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Spence, I., & Lewandowski, S. (1990). Graphical perception. In J. Fox & J. Scott Long (Eds.), Modern methods of data analysis (pp. 13–57). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  35. Terry, M., Wilson, J. (authors), Sue O’Connell (series editor). (2010). Focus on academic skills for IELTS. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
  36. Tversky, B. (1995). In F. T. Marchese (Ed.), Cognitive origins of graphic conventions. Understanding images (pp. 29–53). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  37. Visual Literacy Defined approved by ACRL Board of Directors. (2011). The official website of the American Library Association. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/visualliteracy
  38. Wainer, H. (1992). Understanding graphs and tables. Educational Researcher, 12(1), 14–23 Sage Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. What is Visual Literacy. (2012). The official website of the International Visual Literacy Association (IVLA). Retrieved from http://ivla.org/new/what-is-visual-literacy-2/
  40. Williams, A. (2011). Writing for IELTS. London: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
  41. Yenawine, P. (2014). Thoughts on visual literacy. In J. Flood, S. B. Heath, & D. Lapp (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts (pp. 845–846). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Yu, G., Rea-Dickins, P., & Kiely, R. (2011). The cognitive processes of taking IELTS academic writing task 1. IELTS Research Reports, 11, 373–449 Melbourne: British Council.Google Scholar
  43. Zacks, J., & Tverski, B. (1999). Bars and lines: A study of graphic communication. Memory and Cognition, 27(6), 1073–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marina-Cristiana Rotaru
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Foreign Languages and CommunicationThe Technical University of Civil Engineering BucharestBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations