Advertisement

Benign Lesions (Proliferations) and Tumors of the Breast

  • Simona Stolnicu
Chapter

Abstract

Most of the lesions included in this chapter are frequently encountered in breast pathology and easy to diagnose. Some of them, however, may mimic radiologically, clinically, and pathologically an invasive carcinoma (the so-called pseudoinfiltrative lesions of the breast). Especially in these cases, the experience of the pathologist together with ancillary studies allow a correct diagnosis, while management requires a breast tumor board approach. Also, some of these lesions increase the risk of developing a malignancy, and closer follow-up should be considered in these patients.

Keywords

Fibrocystic changes Adenosis Adenoma 

References

  1. 1.
    Moinfar F. Essentials of diagnostic breast pathology. New York, NY: Springer; 2007. p. 16.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hutter RVP. Consensus meeting: is “fibrocystic disease” of the breast precancerous? Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1986;110:171–3.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stolnicu S, Mocan S, Radulescu D, Podeanu MD. Diagnosticul morfologic al leziunilor mamare. Lanham, MD: University Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leis HP Jr. Fibrocystic disease of the breast. J Med Assoc Alabama. 1962;32:97–104.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tavassoli FA, Purcell CA, Bratthauer GL, Man Y-G. Androgen receptor expression along with loss of bcl-2, ER and PR expression in benign and malignant apocrine lesions of the breast: implications for therapy. Breast J. 1996;4:261–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tavassoli FA, Eusebi V. Tumors of the mammary gland. AFIP Atlas of tumor pathology, series 4. Washington, DC: American Registry of Pathology; 2009.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dupont WD, Page DL. Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative disease. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:146–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Semb C. Pathologico-anatomical and clinical investigations of fibroadenomatosis cystica mammae and its relation to the other pathological conditions in mamma, especially cancer. Acta Chir Scand. 1928;64:1–484.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Anderson TJ, Battersby S. Radial scars and complex sclerosing lesions. Histopathology. 1994;24:296–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hilson JB, Schnitt SJ, Collins LC. Phenotypic alterations in myoepithelial cells associated with benign sclerosing lesions of the breast. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34(6):896–900.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lakhani SR, Schnitt SJ, Tan PH, van de Vijver MJ. WHO classification of tumors of the breast. IARC: Lyon; 2012.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jacobs TW, Byrne C, Colditz G, Connolly JL, Schnitt SJ. Radial scar in benign breast-biopsy specimens and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(6):430–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sanders ME, Page DL, Simpson JF, Schuyler PA, Dale Plummer W, Dupont WD. Interdependence of radial scar and proliferative disease with respect to invasive breast carcinoma risk in patients with benign breast biopsies. Cancer. 2006;106(7):1453–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Resetkova E, Edelweiss M, Albarracin CT, Yang WT. Management of radial sclerosing lesions of the breast diagnosed using percutaneous vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy: recommendations for excision based on seven years of experience at a single institution. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;127(2):335–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bianchi S, Giannotti E, Vanzi E, Marziali M, Abdulcadir D, Boeri C, et al. Radial scar without associated atypical epithelial proliferation on image-guided 14-gauge needle core biopsy: analysis of 49 cases from a single—center and review of the literature. Breast. 2012;21(2):159–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ferreira AI, Borges S, Sousa A, Ribeiro C, Mesquita A, Martins PC, et al. Radial scar of the breast: is it possible to avoid surgery? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43(7):1265–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Carter DJ, Rosen PP. Atypical apocrine metaplasia in sclerosing lesions of the breast. A study of 51 patients. Mod Pathol. 1991;4:1–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rosen PP. Rosen’s breast pathology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2009.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tavassoli FA, Norris HJ. Microglandular adenosis of the breast. A clinicopathologic study of 11 cases with ultrastructural observations. Am J Surg Pathol. 1983;7(8):731–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Clement PB, Azzopardi JG. Microglamdular adenosis of the breast—a lesion simulating tubular racinoma. Histopathology. 1983;7(2):169–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rosen PP. Microglandular adenosis. A benign lesion simulating invasive mammary carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1983;7(2):137–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Geyer FC, Lacroix-Triki M, Colombo PE, Patani N, Gauthier A, Natrajan R, et al. Molecular evidence in support of the neoplastic and precursor nature of microglandular adenosis. Histopathology. 2012;60:E115–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Khalifeh IM, Albarracin C, Diaz LK, Symmans FW, Edgerton ME, Hwang RF, et al. Clinical, histopathologic and immunohistochemical features of mucroglandular adenosis and transition into in situ and invasive carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32(2):544–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shin SJ, Rosen PP. Pregnancy-like (pseudolactational) hyperplasia: a primary diagnosis in mammographically detected lesions of the breast and its relationship to cystic hypersecretory hyperplasia. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24:1670–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tavassoli FA. Pathology of the breast. 2nd ed. Appleton and Lange: Stamford, CT; 1999.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simona Stolnicu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PathologyUniversity of Medicine and PharmacyTîrgu MureșRomania

Personalised recommendations