Advertisement

Introduction

  • Paul Wojtkowski
Chapter

Chapter Commentary

Agroecology has a history deeply rooted in antiquity. Regardless, it is comparatively new in people’s consciousness and in many of the approaches advocated. To place agroecology in a modern context, it should be compared with the reigning paradigms, i.e., both to conventional agriculture and what is often termed the green revolution model.

These comparisons look at the good and the bad. The notion, and the hope, is that agroecology is capable of setting higher standards while mitigating those aspects of agriculture that are deemed unsavory or harmful. It is from this base that agroecology develops.

Good as this is, agroecology can, in the right situations, ecologically and economically outperform conventional agriculture. By way of biodiversity, well-formulated and redundant eco-services can enhance yields and/or lower costs. This involves a range of bio-techniques and a high degree of complexity. Less trodden, these are roads worth traveling. They are outlined in this text.

References

  1. Bretagnolle, V., & Gaba, S. (2015). Weeds for bees? a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 35(3), 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, L. R. (2005). Outgrowing the earth: The food security challenge in the age of falling water tables and raising temperatures. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  3. Burgis, T. (2016). The Billionaire’s farm. Financial Times 39, 101(March 2):7.Google Scholar
  4. Francis, C., Lieblein, G., Gliessman, S., et al. (2003). Agroecology: The ecology of food systems. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 22(3), 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hakim, D. (2016). Doubts about a Promised Bounty. The New York Times CLVXVI(57,401-30-Oct.):1.Google Scholar
  6. Hakim, D. (2017). Scientists loved and loathed by an agrochemical colossus. The New York Times CLXVI (57,465–2 Jan.):1.Google Scholar
  7. Holt-Giménez, E., & Altieri, M. A. (2013). Agriculture, food sovereignty, and the new green revolution. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 37(1), 90–102.Google Scholar
  8. Kerr, R. A. (2009). Northern India’s groundwater is going, going, going. Science, 5942(325–14 August), 789.Google Scholar
  9. National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Genetically engineered crops, experience and prospects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 420p.Google Scholar
  10. Reynolds, P. J. (1980). The working agroscape of the iron age. Landscape History (Vol. 2, pp. 1–20), Journal of the Society for Landscape History, Rampart Press.Google Scholar
  11. Stadlier, M. (2016). CropLife Nigeria assesses contract sprayers in Borno State. N2Africa (http://www.n2africa.org/print/4288).

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Wojtkowski
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidad de ConcepciónPittsfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations