Advertisement

Analytical and Experimental Modal Analysis of a Model Cold Formed Steel (CFS) Structures Using Microtremor Excitation

  • Azer A. Kasimzade
  • Sertac Tuhta
  • Gencay Atmaca
  • Sevda Ozdemir
Chapter

Abstract

In this study was investigated the possibility of using the recorded micro-tremor data on ground level as ambient vibration input excitation data for investigation and application Operational Modal Analysis (OMA) on the bench-scale earthquake simulator (The Quanser Shake Table) for model cold formed steel (cfs) structures. As known OMA methods (such as EFDD, SSI and so on) are supposed to deal with the ambient responses. For this purpose, analytical and experimental modal analysis of a model (cfs) structure for dynamic characteristics was evaluated. 3D Finite element model of the building was evaluated for the model (cfs) structure based on the design drawing. Ambient excitation was provided by shake table from the recorded micro tremor ambient vibration data on ground level. Enhanced Frequency Domain Decomposition is used for the output-only modal identification. From this study, best correlation is found between mode shapes. Natural frequencies and analytical frequencies in average (only) 2.99% are differences.

Keywords

Experimental modal analysis Modal parameter EFDD Shake table 

References

  1. Alvin KF, Park KC (1994) Second-order structural identification procedure via state-space-based system identification. AIAA J 32(2):397–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ANSI S2.47-1990 Vibration of buildings-Guidelines for the measurement of vibrations and evaluation of their effects on buildingsGoogle Scholar
  3. ARTeMIS Extractor, Structural Vibration Solutions, Aalborg, Denmark (1999)Google Scholar
  4. Balmes E (1997) New results on the identification of normal modes from experimental complex modes. Mech Syst Signal Process 11(2):229–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bendat JS (1998) Nonlinear systems techniques and applications. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  6. Brincker R, Ventura C (2015) Introduction to operational modal analysis. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  7. Brincker R, Zhang L, Andersen P (2000) Modal identification from ambient responses using frequency domain decomposition. In: Proceedings of the 18th International modal analysis conference (IMAC), San Antonio, Texas, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. Cunha A, Caetano E, Magalhaes F, Moutinho C (2005) From input-output to output-only modal identification of civil engineering structures. In: 1st International operational modal analysis conference (IOMAC), Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  9. Friswell M, Mottershead JE (1995) Finite element model updating in structural dynamics. Springer Science-Business MediaGoogle Scholar
  10. HO Β, Kalman RE (1966) Effective construction of linear state-variable models from input/output functions. at-Automatisierungstechnik, 14(1–12):545–548Google Scholar
  11. Ibrahim SR (1977) Random decrement technique for modal identification of structures. J Spacecraft Rockets 14(11):696–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ibrahim SR, Miculcik EC (1977) A method for the direct identification of vibration parameters from the free response. Shock Vib Bull 47(4):183–194Google Scholar
  13. Jacobsen NJ, Andersen P, Brincker R (2006) Using enhanced frequency domain decomposition as a robust technique to harmonic excitation in operational modal analysis. In: International conference on noise and vibration engineering (ISMA), Leuven, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  14. Juang JN (1994) Applied system identification. Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  15. Juang JN, Pappa RS (1985) An eigensystem realization algorithm for modal parameter identification and model reduction. J Guid Control Dyn 8(5):620–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Juang JN, Cooper JE, Wright JR (1988) An eigensystem realization algorithm using data correlations (ERA/DC) for modal parameter identification. Control-Theory Adv Technol 4(1):5–14MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. Juang JN, Phan M, Horta LGand, Longman RW (1993) Identification of observer/kalman filter markov parameters-theory and experiments. J Guid Control Dyn 16(2):320–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kalman RE (1960) A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. J Basic Eng 82(1):35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kasimzade AA (2006) Coupling of the control system and the system identification toolboxes with application in structural dynamics. In: International control conference (ICC2006), Glasgow, Scotland, UKGoogle Scholar
  20. Kasimzade AA, Tuhta S (2005) Ambient vibration test on detection of dynamic properties of reinforced concrete building. In: 1st International operational modal analysis conference (IOMAC), Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  21. Kasimzade AA, Tuhta S (2007a) Ambient vibration analysis of steel structure. In: 2nd international operational modal analysis conference (IOMAC), Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  22. Kasimzade AA, Tuhta S (2007b) Ambient vibration analysis of steel structure. Experimental vibration analysis of civil engineering structures (EVACES’07), Porto, Portugal, OctoberGoogle Scholar
  23. Kasimzade AA, Tuhta S (2007c) Particularities of monitoring, identification, model updating hierarchy in experimental vibration analysis of structures. Experimental vibration analysis of civil engineering structures (EVACES’07), Porto, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  24. Kasimzade AA, Tuhta S (2009) Optimal estimation the building system characteristics for modal identification. In: 3rd International operational modal analysis conference (IOMAC), Porto Novo, Ancona, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  25. Kasimzade AA, Tuhta S (2012) Stochastic parametrical system identification approach for validation of finite elements models. TWMS J Pure Appl Math 3(1):11–32MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Ljung L (1999) System Identification: theory for the user. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  27. Lus H, De Angelis M, Betti R, Longman RW (2003) Constructing second-order models of mechanical systems from identified state space realizations. Part I: theoretical discussions. J Eng Mech 129(5):477–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marwala T (2010) Finite element model updating using computational intelligence techniques: applications to structural dynamics. Springer Science-Business MediaGoogle Scholar
  29. Peeters B (2000) System identification and damage detection in civil engineering. Ph.D. dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  30. Phan MQ, Longman RW, Lee SC, Lee JW (2003) System identification from multiple-trial data corrupted by non-repeating periodic disturbances. Int J Appl Math Comput Sci 13(2):185–192MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Quanser (2008) Position control and earthquake analysis. Quanser Shake Table II User Manual, Nr 632, Rev 3.50, QuanserInc, Markham, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  32. Roeck GD (2003) The state-of-the-art of damage detection by vibration monitoring: the SIMCES experience. J Struct Control 10(2):127–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. SAP2000, Integrated finite element analysis and design of structures, computers and structures Inc, Berkeley, California, USA (1997)Google Scholar
  34. Sestieri A, Ibrahim SR (1994) Analysis of errors and approximations in the use of modal coordinates. J Sound Vib 177(2):145–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Trifunac MD (1972) Comparisons between ambient and forced vibration experiments. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 1(2):133–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tseng DH, Longman RW, Juang JN (1994a) Identification of the structure of the damping matrix in second order mechanical systems. Spaceflight Mechanics, pp 167–190Google Scholar
  37. Tseng DH, Longman RW, Juang JN (1994b) Identification of gyroscopic and nongyroscopic second order mechanical systems including repeated root problems. Spaceflight Mechanics, pp 145–165Google Scholar
  38. Van Overschee P, De Moor BL (1996) Subspace identification for linear systems: theory-implementation-applications. Springer Science-Business MediaGoogle Scholar
  39. Ventura CE, Schuster ND (1996) Structural dynamic properties of a reinforced concrete high-rise building during construction. Can J Civ Eng 23(4):950–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wenzel H, Pichler D (2005) Ambient vibration monitoring. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Azer A. Kasimzade
    • 1
  • Sertac Tuhta
    • 1
  • Gencay Atmaca
    • 1
  • Sevda Ozdemir
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringOndokuz Mayis UniversityAtakum, SamsunTurkey

Personalised recommendations