Advertisement

Workflow Support in Wearable Production Information Systems

  • Stefan Schönig
  • Ana Paula Aires
  • Andreas Ermer
  • Stefan Jablonski
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 317)

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) is the inter-networking of physical objects like electronic hardware or humans using wearable digital devices. IoT allows things to be controlled remotely across existing network infrastructures. A business process is a collection of related events, activities, and decisions that involves a number of resources. To support processes at an operational level, a Business Process Management system (BPMS) can be used. During process execution, a variety of information is required to make meaningful decisions. With the emergence of IoT, data is generated from physical devices sensing their environment that reflects certain aspects of operative processes. We introduce a toolset for an IoT-aware business process execution system that exploits IoT for BPM by providing IoT data in a process-aware way, considering IoT data for interaction in a pre-defined process model, and providing wearable user interfaces with context specific IoT data provision. The toolset has been evaluated extensively in production industry.

Keywords

Process execution Internet of Things Wearable interface 

References

  1. 1.
    Tao, F., et al.: Advanced manufacturing systems: socialization characteristics and trends. J. Intell. Manuf. 28, 1–16 (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schönig, S., Jablonski, S., Ermer, A., Aires, A.P.: Digital connected production: wearable manufacturing information systems. In: Debruyne, C., Panetto, H., Weichhart, G., Bollen, P., Ciuciu, I., Vidal, M.-E., Meersman, R. (eds.) OTM 2017. LNCS, vol. 10697, pp. 56–65. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73805-5_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mandal, S., Hewelt, M., Weske, M.: A framework for integrating real-world events and business processes in an IoT environment. In: Panetto, H., et al. (eds.) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems OTM 2017 Conferences. LNCS, vol. 10573, pp. 194–212. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69462-7_13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Petrasch, R., Hentschke, R.: Process modeling for industry 4.0 applications - towards an industry 4.0 process modeling language and method. In: International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Graja, I., et al.: BPMN4CPS: A BPMN extension for modeling cyber-physical systems. In: WETICE, pp. 152–157. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Meyer, S., Ruppen, A., Magerkurth, C.: Internet of Things-aware process modeling: integrating IoT devices as business process resources. In: Salinesi, C., Norrie, M.C., Pastor, Ó. (eds.) CAiSE 2013. LNCS, vol. 7908, pp. 84–98. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38709-8_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Meyer, S., Ruppen, A., Hilty, L.: The things of the Internet of Things in BPMN. In: Persson, A., Stirna, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2015. LNBIP, vol. 215, pp. 285–297. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19243-7_27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Domingos, D., Martins, F., Cândido, C., Martinho, R.: Internet of Things aware WS-BPEL business processes context variables and expected exceptions. J. Univers. Comput. Sci. 20(8), 1109–1129 (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    George, A.A., Ward, P.A.: An architecture for providing context in WS-BPEL processes. In: Conference of Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wieland, M., Kopp, O., Nicklas, D., Leymann, F.: Towards context-aware workflows. In: CAiSE Workshops and Doctoral Consortium, vol. 2, p. 25 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mateo, J.A., Valero, V., Dıaz, G.: BPEL-RF: a formal framework for bpel orchestrations integrating distributed resources, arXiv:1203.1760 (2012)
  12. 12.
    Schmidt, B., Schief, M.: Towards agile business processes based on the Internet of Things. In: Dangelmaier, W., Blecken, A., Delius, R., Klöpfer, S. (eds.) IHNS 2010. LNBIP, vol. 46, pp. 257–262. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12494-5_23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meroni, G., Di Ciccio, C., Mendling, J.: An artifact-driven approach to monitor business processes through real-world objects. In: Maximilien, M., Vallecillo, A., Wang, J., Oriol, M. (eds.) ICSOC 2017. LNCS, vol. 10601, pp. 297–313. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69035-3_21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Meroni, G., et al.: Multi-party business process compliance monitoring through iot-enabled artifacts. Inf. Syst. 73, 61–78 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schobel, J., Pryss, R., Schickler, M., Reichert, M.: A lightweight process engine for enabling advanced mobile applications. In: Debruyne, C., et al. (eds.) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2016 Conferences, OTM 2016. LNCS, vol. 10033, pp. 552–569. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48472-3_33CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Schönig
    • 1
  • Ana Paula Aires
    • 2
  • Andreas Ermer
    • 2
  • Stefan Jablonski
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Computer ScienceUniversity of BayreuthBayreuthGermany
  2. 2.Maxsyma GmbH & Co. KGFloßGermany

Personalised recommendations