Advertisement

Aligning Goal and Decision Modeling

  • Renata Guizzardi
  • Anna Perini
  • Angelo SusiEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 317)

Abstract

Making decisions is part of the everyday life of any organization. Documenting such decisions is important to allow organizational members to learn from past mistakes, and to support newcomers in adjusting into the organization. However, nowadays, decisions are usually documented in unstructured ways, which makes it hard to find and interpret them. In this work, we propose the alignment of goals and decision modeling, by using two existing modeling notations, namely i* and DMN. This alignment is based on a semantic approach, in which the elements of the notations are mapped into a decision-making ontology, also developed in the context of this work.

Keywords

Decision-making Goal Alignment of modeling notations Ontology 

References

  1. 1.
    van Heijst, G., van der Spek, R., Kruizinga, E.: The lessons learned cycle. In: Borghoff, U.M., Pareschi, R. (eds.) Information Technology for Knowledge Management, pp. 17–34. Springer, Heidelberg (1998).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03723-2_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    OMG. Decision Model and Notation (DMN) v 1.1. (2016). https://www.omg.org/spec/DMN/About-DMN/. Accessed 28 Feb 2018
  3. 3.
    Janssens, L., Bazhenova, E., De Smedt, J., Vanthienen, J., Denecker, M.: Consistent integration of decision (DMN) and process (BPMN) models. In: España, S., Ivanović, M., Savić, M. (eds.) CEUR Workshop Proceedings CAiSE Forum 2016, pp. 121–128 (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Giorgini, P., Maiden, N., Mylopoulos, J., Yu, E. (eds.): Social Modeling for Requirements Engineering. MIT Press, Cambridge (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guizzardi, R., Guizzardi, G.: Ontology-based transformation framework from tropos to AORML. In: [4], pp. 547–570 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cardoso, E., Almeida, J.P., Guizzardi, R.: Analysing the relations between strategic and operational aspects of an enterprise: towards an ontology-based approach. Int. J. Organ. Des. Eng. 2(3), 271–294 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guizzardi, G.: Ontological foundations for structural conceptual models. Ph.D thesis. University of Twente, The Netherlands (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guizzardi, G., Falbo, R., Guizzardi, R.: Grounding software domain ontologies in the unified foundational ontology (UFO): the case of the ODE software process ontology In: IDEAS 2008, Recife, Brazil (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    van Lamsweerde, A.: Reasoning about alternative requirements options. In: Borgida, A.T., Chaudhri, V.K., Giorgini, P., Yu, E.S. (eds.) Conceptual Modeling: Foundations and Applications. LNCS, vol. 5600, pp. 380–397. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02463-4_20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jiang, L., Barone, D., Amyot, D., Mylopoulos, J.: Strategic models for business intelligence. In: Jeusfeld, M., Delcambre, L., Ling, T.-W. (eds.) ER 2011. LNCS, vol. 6998, pp. 429–439. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24606-7_33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G., de Almeida Falbo, R., Guizzardi, R.S.S., Almeida, J.P.A.: Towards ontological foundations for the conceptual modeling of events. In: Ng, W., Storey, V.C., Trujillo, J.C. (eds.) ER 2013. LNCS, vol. 8217, pp. 327–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41924-9_27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marchetto, A., Nguyen, C.D., Di Francescomarino, C., Qureshi, N.A., Perini, A., Tonella, P.: A design methodology for real services. In: PESOS 2010, pp. 15–21 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ontology and Conceptual Modeling Research Group (NEMO)Federal University of Espírito SantoVitória/ESBrazil
  2. 2.Fondazione Bruno KesslerTrentoItaly

Personalised recommendations