Advertisement

Open Non-mesh Inguinal Hernia Repair

  • Bruce Ramshaw
  • Sherard Chiu
Chapter

Abstract

Despite the fact that dozens of open inguinal hernia tissue repair techniques exist in the surgical literature, it is not currently a commonly performed technique in the United States. In the past quarter of a century, laparoscopic and open “tension-free” mesh inguinal hernia repairs have been a preferred approach for inguinal hernia repair. However, with an increased emphasis on other outcomes besides recurrence that impact the patient’s quality of life, in particular chronic pain, there is a growing interest in re-visiting non-mesh inguinal hernia repairs. Although not nearly as simple as thinking that mesh can cause chronic pain, it is possible that mesh may be a contributing factor in addition to many other factors, known and potentially not yet known, that result in a complication such as chronic pain. Other complications that may involve mesh as a contributing factor include infection, erosion, contraction, or migration that contributes to a recurrence and rare incidences of allergic-type and systemic/immune reactions. This chapter will highlight some of the established tissue repairs, discuss the reasons why they are of growing interest, and describe some of the general principles in performing a tissue repair.

Keywords

Inguinal hernia Tissue repair Open approach Suture repair 

Selected References

  1. Amato B, Moja L, Panico S, et al. Shouldice technique versus other open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;18(4):CD001543.Google Scholar
  2. Bendavid R, Lou W, Grischkan D, et al. A mechanism of mesh-related post-herniorrhaphy neuralgia. Hernia. 2016;20(3):357–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bulbuller N, Kirkil C, Godekmerdan A, et al. The comparison of inflammatory response and clinical results after groin hernia repair using polypropylene or polyester meshes. Ind J Surg. 2015;77(Suppl 2):S283–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fischer JE. Hernia repair: why do we continue to perform mesh repair in the face of the human toll of inguinodynia? Am J Surg. 2013) Oct;206(4):619–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Iakovlev VV, Guelcher SA, Bendavid R. Degradation of polypropylene in vivo: a microscopic analysis of meshes explanted from patients. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2017;105(2):237–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Malik A, Bell CM, Stukel TA, Urbach DR. Recurrence of inguinal hernias repaired in a large hernia surgical specialty hospital and general hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Can J Surg. 2016;59(1):19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Szopinski J, Dabrowiecki S, Pierscinski S, et al. Desarda versus Lichtenstein technique for primary inguinal hernia treatment: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial. World J Surg. 2012;36:984–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of Tennessee Medical Center and Graduate School of MedicineKnoxvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryUniversity of Tennessee Graduate School of MedicineKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations