Advertisement

Surgical Outcomes: The Importance of Surgeon-Kept Data in Hernia Care

  • Nicholas H. Carter
  • Richard A. Pierce
Chapter

Abstract

Wide variation in inguinal hernia management remains the rule. Recent decades have seen increased diversity of techniques and materials for hernia repair. The need for data-driven evaluation of various strategies for hernia management has never been greater. Historically, landmark studies of hernia care have relied on surgeon-researchers to collect their own prospective data using federally supported research infrastructure. Modern databases such as the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Database (ACS NSQIP) and Veteran Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Database (VASQIP) do not capture hernia-specific outcomes such as recurrence or chronic pain and report postoperative complications only within a 30-day interval. National and international databases in Europe have demonstrated success in collecting hernia-specific data to drive quality improvement. The Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC) promises to help shift long-term data collection away from overburdened individual providers and to promote standardized, detailed metrics relevant to hernia patients to expand our knowledge regarding best practices in hernia management.

Keywords

Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC) American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Database (ACS NSQIP) EuraHS Herniamed Veteran Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Database (VASQIP) 

References

  1. 1.
    Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL. Open “tension-free” repair of inguinal hernias: the Lichtenstein technique. Europ J Surg = Acta chirurgica. 1996;162(6):447–53.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Scott NW, McCormack K, Graham P, Go PM, Ross SJ, Grant AM. Open mesh versus non-mesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(4):Cd002197.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R Jr, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, et al. Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(18):1819–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eklund A, Carlsson P, Rosenblad A, Montgomery A, Bergkvist L, Rudberg C. Long-term cost-minimization analysis comparing laparoscopic with open (Lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2010;97(5):765–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Karthikesalingam A, Markar SR, Holt PJ, Praseedom RK. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open mesh repair of recurrent inguinal hernia. Br J Surg. 2010;97(1):4–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cavazzola LT, Rosen MJ. Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair. Surg Clin North Am. 2013;93(5):1269–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Giobbie-Hurder A, Gibbs JO, Dunlop DD, Reda DJ, McCarthy M Jr, et al. Watchful waiting vs repair of inguinal hernia in minimally symptomatic men: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006;295(3):285–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Johner A, Faulds J, Wiseman SM. Planned ilioinguinal nerve excision for prevention of chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis. Surgery. 2011;150(3):534–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Amid PK, Hiatt JR. New understanding of the causes and surgical treatment of postherniorrhaphy inguinodynia and orchalgia. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205(2):381–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Amid PK, Chen DC. Surgical treatment of chronic groin and testicular pain after laparoscopic and open preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213(4):531–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Poobalan AS, Bruce J, King PM, Chambers WA, Krukowski ZH, Smith WC. Chronic pain and quality of life following open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2001;88(8):1122–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Courtney CA, Duffy K, Serpell MG, O'Dwyer PJ. Outcome of patients with severe chronic pain following repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg. 2002;89(10):1310–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen DC, Amid PK. Prevention of inguinodynia: the need for continuous refinement and quality improvement in inguinal hernia repair. World J Surg. 2014;38(10):2571–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shah NS, Fullwood C, Siriwardena AK, Sheen AJ. Mesh fixation at laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis comparing tissue glue and tack fixation. World J Surg. 2014;38(10):2558–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alfieri S, Rotondi F, Di Giorgio A, Fumagalli U, Salzano A, Di Miceli D, et al. Influence of preservation versus division of ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, and genital nerves during open mesh herniorrhaphy: prospective multicentric study of chronic pain. Ann Surg. 2006;243(4):553–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mui WL, Ng CS, Fung TM, Cheung FK, Wong CM, Ma TH, et al. Prophylactic ilioinguinal neurectomy in open inguinal hernia repair: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2006;244(1):27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fischer JE. Hernia repair: why do we continue to perform mesh repair in the face of the human toll of inguinodynia? Am J Surg. 2013;206(4):619–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, Halm JA, Verdaasdonk EG, Jeekel J. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg. 2004;240(4):578–83. discussion 83–5PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Heniford BT, Park A, Ramshaw BJ, Voeller G. Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair in 407 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;190(6):645–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Baucom RB, Beck WC, Phillips SE, Holzman MD, Sharp KW, Nealon WH, et al. Comparative evaluation of dynamic abdominal sonography for hernia and computed tomography for characterization of incisional hernia. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(6):591–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Baucom RB, Ousley J, Feurer ID, Beveridge GB, Pierce RA, Holzman MD, et al. Patient reported outcomes after incisional hernia repair-establishing the ventral hernia recurrence inventory. Am J Surg. 2016;212(1):81–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wilkiemeyer M, Pappas TN, Giobbie-Hurder A, Itani KM, Jonasson O, Neumayer LA. Does resident post graduate year influence the outcomes of inguinal hernia repair? Ann Surg. 2005;241(6):879–82. discussion 82–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lal P, Kajla RK, Chander J, Ramteke VK. Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: overcoming the learning curve. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(4):642–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schouten N, Elshof JW, Simmermacher RK, van Dalen T, de Meer SG, Clevers GJ, et al. Selecting patients during the “learning curve” of endoscopic totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair. Hernia : J Hernias Abdominal Wall Surg. 2013;17(6):737–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schouten N, Simmermacher RK, van Dalen T, Smakman N, Clevers GJ, Davids PH, et al. Is there an end of the “learning curve” of endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair? Surg Endosc. 2013;27(3):789–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Neumayer LA, Gawande AA, Wang J, Giobbie-Hurder A, Itani KM, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, et al. Proficiency of surgeons in inguinal hernia repair: effect of experience and age. Ann Surg. 2005;242(3):344–8; discussion 8–52PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gawande AA. The bell curve: what happens when patients find out how good their doctors really are? The New Yorker. 2004.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Muysoms FE, Deerenberg EB, Peeters E, Agresta F, Berrevoet F, Campanelli G, et al. Recommendations for reporting outcome results in abdominal wall repair: results of a consensus meeting in Palermo, Italy, 28-30 June 2012. Hernia : J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg. 2013;17(4):423–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nilsson H, Angeras U, Sandblom G, Nordin P. Serious adverse events within 30 days of groin hernia surgery. Hernia : J Hernias Abdominal Wall Surg. 2016;20(3):377–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nilsson E. Outcomes. In: Kark AE, Kurzer MN, Wantz GE, editors. Surgical Management of Abdominal Wall Hernias. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science Inc; 1999. p. 11–8.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lundstrom KJ, Sandblom G, Smedberg S, Nordin P. Risk factors for complications in groin hernia surgery: a national register study. Ann Surg. 2012;255(4):784–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    van der Linden W, Warg A, Nordin P. National register study of operating time and outcome in hernia repair. Arch Surg (Chicago, Ill : 1960). 2011;146(10):1198–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H, Strand L, Malmstrom J, Andersen FH, Wara P, et al. Quality assessment of 26,304 herniorrhaphies in Denmark: a prospective nationwide study. Lancet (London, England). 2001;358(9288):1124–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kehlet H, Bay-Nielsen M. Nationwide quality improvement of groin hernia repair from the Danish Hernia Database of 87,840 patients from 1998 to 2005. Hernia : J Hernias Abdominal Wall Surg. 2008;12(1):1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Friis-Andersen H, Bisgaard T. The Danish inguinal hernia database. Clin Epidemiol. 2016;8:521–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bay-Nielsen M, Nordin P, Nilsson E, Kehlet H. Operative findings in recurrent hernia after a Lichtenstein procedure. Am J Surg. 2001;182(2):134–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bay-Nielsen M, Nilsson E, Nordin P, Kehlet H. Chronic pain after open mesh and sutured repair of indirect inguinal hernia in young males. Br J Surg. 2004;91(10):1372–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stechemesser B, Jacob DA, Schug-Pass C, Kockerling F. Herniamed: an internet-based registry for outcome research in hernia surgery. Hernia : J Hernias Abdominal Wall Surg. 2012;16(3):269–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kockerling F, Bittner R, Jacob D, Schug-Pass C, Laurenz C, Adolf D, et al. Do we need antibiotic prophylaxis in endoscopic inguinal hernia repair? Results of the Herniamed registry. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(12):3741–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Klobusicky P, Feyerherd P. Usage of a self-adhesive mesh in TAPP hernia repair: a prospective study based on Herniamed register. J minim Access Surg. 2016;12(3):226–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kockerling F, Bittner R, Kraft B, Hukauf M, Kuthe A, Schug-Pass C. Does surgeon volume matter in the outcome of endoscopic inguinal hernia repair? Surg Endosc. 2016.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Muysoms F, Campanelli G, Champault GG, DeBeaux AC, Dietz UA, Jeekel J, et al. EuraHS: the development of an international online platform for registration and outcome measurement of ventral abdominal wall hernia repair. Hernia : J Hernias Abdominal Wall Surg. 2012;16(3):239–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Muysoms FE, Vanlander A, Ceulemans R, Kyle-Leinhase I, Michiels M, Jacobs I, et al. A prospective, multicenter, observational study on quality of life after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with ProGrip laparoscopic, self-fixating mesh according to the European registry for Abdominal Wall hernias quality of life instrument. Surgery. 2016;160(5):1344–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Snyder CW, Graham LA, Gray SH, Vick CC, Hawn MT. Effect of mesh type and position on subsequent abdominal operations after incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212(4):496–502; discussion −4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Froylich D, Haskins IN, Aminian A, O'Rourke CP, Khorgami Z, Boules M, et al. Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair in patients with obesity: an American College of Surgeons NSQIP clinical outcomes analysis. Surg Endosc. 2016.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hawn MT, Snyder CW, Graham LA, Gray SH, Finan KR, Vick CC. Hospital-level variability in incisional hernia repair technique affects patient outcomes. Surgery. 2011;149(2):185–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Mason RJ, Moazzez A, Sohn HJ, Berne TV, Katkhouda N. Laparoscopic versus open anterior abdominal wall hernia repair: 30-day morbidity and mortality using the ACS-NSQIP database. Ann Surg. 2011;254(4):641–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Chung PJ, Lee JS, Tam S, Schwartzman A, Bernstein MO, Dresner L, et al. Predicting 30-day postoperative mortality for emergent anterior abdominal wall hernia repairs using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Hernia: J Hernias Abdominal Wall Surg. 2016.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Poulose BK, Roll S, Murphy JW, Matthews BD, Todd Heniford B, Voeller G, et al. Design and implementation of the Americas hernia society quality collaborative (AHSQC): improving value in hernia care. Hernia : J Hernias Abdominal Wall Surg. 2016;20(2):177–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Krpata DM, Haskins IN, Phillips S, Prabhu AS, Rosenblatt S, Poulose BK, et al. Does preoperative bowel preparation reduce surgical site infections during elective ventral hernia repair? J Am Coll Surg. 2016.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations