Advertisement

Embodiment of Emotion Regulation

  • Olga Pollatos
  • Eszter Ferentzi
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, we provide an overview how emotion regulation is related to embodiment, the individual experience shaped by the state of the body and its mental representation. Firstly, we summarize the main concepts of emotion regulation, and the relation between emotion processing and interoception, i.e. the perception of the internal bodily cues. Secondly, we introduce two models of emotion regulation, the process model of Gross and the hierarchical neuro-cognitive model of Smith and Lane. Lastly, interoceptive abilities are discussed in the context of emotion regulation, and some clinical guidelines are provided.

References

  1. Barrett, L. F., Gross, J., Christensen, T. C., & Benvenuto, M. (2001). Knowing what you’re feeling and knowing what to do about it: Mapping the relation between emotion differentiation and emotion regulation. Cognition and Emotion, 15(6), 713–724.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930143000239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bornemann, B., & Singer, T. (2017). Taking time to feel our body: Steady increases in heartbeat perception accuracy and decreases in alexithymia over 9 months of contemplative mental training. Psychophysiology, 54(3), 469–482.  https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’s error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  4. Damasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  5. Dunn, B. D., Evans, D., Makarova, D., White, J., & Clark, L. (2012). Gut feelings and the reaction to perceived inequity: The interplay between bodily responses, regulation, and perception shapes the rejection of unfair offers on the ultimatum game. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 12(3), 419–429.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-012-0092-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fischer, D., Messner, M., & Pollatos, O. (2017). Improvement of interoceptive processes after an 8-week body scan intervention. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 452.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00452CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Friedman, B. H. (2010). Feelings and the body: The Jamesian perspective on autonomic specificity of emotion. Biological Psychology, 84(3), 383–393.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.10.006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Füstös, J., Gramann, K., Herbert, B. M., & Pollatos, O. (2013). On the embodiment of emotion regulation: Interoceptive awareness facilitates reappraisal. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(8), 911–917.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss089CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gross, J. J., & Thompson, R. A. (2007). Emotion regulation: Conceptual foundations. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 3–24). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  11. Grynberg, D., & Pollatos, O. (2015). Perceiving one’s body shapes empathy. Physiology & Behavior, 140, 54–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.12.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Herbert, B. M., & Pollatos, O. (2012). The body in the mind: On the relationship between interoception and embodiment. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 692–704.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01189.xCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Koch, A., & Pollatos, O. (2014). Cardiac sensitivity in children: Sex differences and its relationship to parameters of emotional processing. Psychophysiology, 51(9), 932–941.  https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12233CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Pollatos, O., Gramann, K., & Schandry, R. (2007). Neural systems connecting interoceptive awareness and feelings. Human Brain Mapping, 28(1), 9–18.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20258CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Pollatos, O., Herbert, B. M., Mai, S., & Kammer, T. (2016). Changes in interoceptive processes following brain stimulation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1708), 20160016.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pollatos, O., Matthias, E., & Keller, J. (2015). When interoception helps to overcome negative feelings caused by social exclusion. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 786.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00786CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Prinz, J. J. (2004). Gut reactions: A perceptual theory of the emotions. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Prinz, J. J. (2006). Is emotion a form of perception? Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 36(5), 137–160.  https://doi.org/10.1353/cjp.2007.0035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Singer, T., & Lamm, C. (2009). The social neuroscience of empathy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156, 81–96.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04418.xCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Smith, R., & Lane, R. D. (2015). The neural basis of one’s own conscious and unconscious emotional states. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 57(Suppl C), 1–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.08.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Terasawa, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Tochizawa, S., & Umeda, S. (2014). Interoceptive sensitivity predicts sensitivity to the emotions of others. Cognition & Emotion, 28(8), 1435–1448.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.888988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tsakiris, M. (2017). The multisensory basis of the self: From body to identity to others [Formula: see text]. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 70(4), 597–609.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1181768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Werner, N. S., Kerschreiter, R., Kindermann, N. K., & Duschek, S. (2013). Interoceptive awareness as a moderator of affective responses to social exclusion. Journal of Psychophysiology, 27(1), 39–50.  https://doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803/a000086CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Clinical and Health PsychologyInstitute of Psychology and Education, Ulm UniversityUlmGermany
  2. 2.Doctoral School of PsychologyELTE Eötvös Loránd UniversityBudapestHungary
  3. 3.Institute of Health Promotion and Sport Sciences, ELTE Eötvös Loránd UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations