Advertisement

Strategic Negotiation for Resolving Infrastructure Development Disputes in the Belt and Road Initiative

  • Waqas Ahmed
  • Qingmei Tan
  • Sharafat Ali
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 315)

Abstract

Regional economic corridors are playing a role in uplifting the infrastructure of developing countries. But, such integrations are prone to some challenges emerging from the multilevel system of governance in participating countries. It is necessary that legitimate stakeholders get involved at national, provincial and local levels using collaborative planning and development. Exclusion at any level would ultimately lead to unsolicited and undesirable outcomes. The present study uses Graph Model for Conflict Resolution (GMCR) as a primary conflict resolution tool to resolve Pakistan Railway (PR) infrastructure development disputes under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). This tool takes into consideration interests of all stakeholders. It could be used for future planning by policymakers.

Keywords

Regional infrastructure Planning Conflict analysis Belt and road initiative China-Pakistan economic corridor 

References

  1. 1.
    Li, J., Ma, C., Xie, X.: Research on employment opportunities under the framework of China Pakistan economic corridor, G.C. University, Lahore (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ECDPM: European Centre for Development Policy Management, February 2014. http://ecdpm.org/publications/drives-regional-economic-integration-lessons-maputo-development-corridor/. Accessed 11 April 2017
  3. 3.
    Kuklinski, A.: Regional development, regional policies and regional planning. Reg. Stud. 4(3), 269–278 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kovacs, E., Fabok, V., Kaloczkai, A., Hansen, H.P.: Towards understanding and resolving the conflict related to the Easter Imperial Eagle (Aquila Heliaca) conservation with participatory management planning. Land Use Policy 54, 158–168 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ploger, J.: Strife: urban planning and egonism. Plan. Theory 3(1), 71–92 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davies, S.R., Selin, C., Gano, G., Pereira, A.G.: Citizen management and urban change: three case studies of material deliberations. Cities 29, 351–357 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fraser, N.M., Hipel, K.W.: Conflict Analysis: Models, and Resolutions. North-Holland, New York (1984)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aas, C., Fletcher, J., Ladkin, A.: Stakeholder collaboration and heritage management. Ann. Tourism Res. 32(1), 28–48 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kou-Ann, C., Xi, Z., Fei, Y.: Harmonious urban development and strategic transportation planning in China. In: Seventh International Conference of Chinese Transportation Professional Congress (ICCP), 21–22 May. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Shanghai (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ruuska, I., Lehtonen, P., Aaltonen, K.: A stakeholder network perspective on unexpected events and their management in international projects. Int. J. Managing Projects Bus. 3(4), 564–588 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ali, W., Gang, L., Raza, M.: China-Pakistan economic corridor: current developments and future prospect for regional integration. Int. J. Res. 3(19), 210–222 (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fang, L., Hipel, K.W., Kilgour, D.M.: Interactive Decision Making: The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. Wiley, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kilgour, D.M., Hipel, K.W.: The Graph model for conflict resolution: past, present, and future. Group Decis. Negot. 14, 441–460 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bilal, S.H.: China-Pakistan economic corridor: regional connectivity. China Int. Bus. 6, 44–51 (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yunjiao, X., Guowei, Z.: Strengthening energy cooperation between China and Pakistan through CPEC. In: Proceedings of International Conference on CPEC Held at GC University, Lahore, 09–10 December 2015Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    CPEC, China Pakistan Economic Corridor (2017). http://cpec.gov.pk/faqs#. Accessed 04 April 2017
  17. 17.
    BOI: List of Agreements/MoUs Signed during visit of Chinese President, 06 June 2015. http://boi.gov.pk/userfiles1/file/List%20of%20MoUs.docx. Accessed 04 April 2017
  18. 18.
    Mahsud, S.A.: The Pushtun Times.com, January 2016. http://thepashtuntimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Working-Paper-of-PUT-on-CPEC.pdf. Accessed 7 April 2017
  19. 19.
    GOB: Government of Baluchistan, May 2015. http://cmpru.gob.pk/reports/CPEC.pdf. Accessed 04 April 2017
  20. 20.
    The Express Tribune: The Express Tribune, 5 December 2016. https://tribune.com.pk/story/1253694/cpecs-western-route-protests-may-erupt-unkept-promises/. Accessed 04 April 2017
  21. 21.
    MOR: Government of Pakistan, 30 June 2016. http://202.83.164.29/railwaysweb/userfiles1/file/ybook201415.pdf. Accessed 04 April 2017
  22. 22.
    Rana, S.: The Express Tribune, 26 July 2015. https://tribune.com.pk/story/926582/economic-corridor-eastern-cpec-route-unfeasible/. Accessed 05 April 2017
  23. 23.
    Ashraf, M.M.: The News International, 9 October 2016. https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/155971-The-CPEC-controversy. Accessed 04 April 2017
  24. 24.
    Haider, I.: Dawn.com, 28 May 2015. https://www.dawn.com/news/1184733. Accessed 04 April 2017
  25. 25.
    Daily Times: Daily Times, 17 January 2016. http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/editorial/17-Jan-2016/cpec-discontents. Accessed 4 April 2017
  26. 26.
    Malik, M.: The Nation, 23 July 2015. http://nation.com.pk/E-Paper/lahore/2015-07-23/page-5. Accessed 6 April 2017
  27. 27.
    The Express Tribune: The Express Tribune, 28 August 2015. https://tribune.com.pk/story/1262963/pm-inaugurates-key-part-cpec-western-corridor-turbat/. Accessed 4 April 2017
  28. 28.
    Abbasi, A.: The News International, 7 October 2016. https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/155573-Propaganda-against-CPEC-upsets-China. Accessed 4 April 2017
  29. 29.
    Pakistan Today: Pakistan Today, 22 November 2015. http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2015/11/22/cpec-for-all-two-routes-being-developed-instead-of-one/. Accessed 5 April 2017
  30. 30.
    Ali, S., Xu, H., Xu, P., Zhao, S.: The analysis of environmental conflict in changzhou foreign language school using a hybrid game. Open Cybern. Systemics J. 11(1), 94–106 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Li, K., Kilgour, D.M., Hipel, K.W.: Status quo analysis of the graph model for conflict resolution. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 56(6), 699–707 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nash, J.F.: Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 36, 48–49 (1950)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nash, J.F.: Non-cooperative games. Ann. Math. 54, 286–295 (1951)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Howard, N.: Paradoxes of Rationality: Theory of Metagames and Political Behavior. MIT, Cambridge (1971)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kassab, M., Hipel, K.W., Hegazy, T.: Conflict resolution in construction disputes using the graph model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 132(10), 1043–1052 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Economics and ManagementNanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations