The EU Seen from Brazil: Images and Perceptions

  • Paula Sandrin
  • Andrea Ribeiro Hoffmann
Part of the The European Union in International Affairs book series (EUIA)


This chapter analyzes how the EU is perceived in Brazil and the ways in which these perceptions might affect EU–Brazil relations. First, we locate ourselves within the literature on EU public diplomacy and strategic narratives. We then briefly summarize EU–Brazil relations in the last decades before presenting the empirical results on EU images and perceptions. Our chapter describes EU perceptions and compares them to Brazilian views on other international actors, including states and international organizations. Informed by insights into existing perceptions, the chapter assesses how the EU’s 2016 Global Strategy is likely to be received in Brazil. Our main finding is that the EU’s attempts to project itself as a normative actor is sometimes seen in Brazil as perpetuating hierarchical Euro-centric relations. This can potentially harm prospects for cooperation between Brazil and the EU, as the bloc is perceived as arrogant and unable to treat Brazil as an equal partner.


  1. Braghiroli, S., & Salini, L. (2014). How the Others See Us? An Analysis of Public Opinion Perceptions of the EU and USA in Third Countries (Transworld Working Papers 33).Google Scholar
  2. Campbell, D. (1998). Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity (Rev. ed.). Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  3. Chaban, N., Knodt, M., & Verdun, A. (Eds.). (2017). Special Issue “External Images of the EU—Energy Power Across the Globe”. Comparative European Politics, 15(1).Google Scholar
  4. Doctor, M. (2007). Why Bother with Interregionalism? Negotiations for a EU–Mercosur Association Agreement. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(2), 281–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Doctor, M. (2015). Interregionalisms Impact on Regional Integration in Developing Countries: The Case of Mercosur. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(2), 967–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Doty, R. L. (1993). Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post-positivist Analysis of U.S. Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines. International Studies Quarterly, 37(3), 297–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Duke, S. (2013). The European External Action Service and Public Diplomacy (Discussion Papers in Diplomacy, n. 127). Clingendael: Netherlands Institute of International Relation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. EEAS and DEVCO. (2012). Information and Communication Handbook for EU Delegations in Third Countries and International Organizations. December, 2012. Available online (accessed September 25, 2016).
  9. Epstein, C. (2011). Who Speaks? Discourse, the Subject and the Study of Identity in International Politics. European Journal of International Relations, 17(2), 327–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Epstein, C. (2013). Constructivism or the Eternal Return of Universals in International Relations. Why Returning to Language is Vital to Prolonging the Owl’s Flight. European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 499–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. EU Global Strategy (EUGS). (2016). Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe – A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy. Available online (accessed September 25, 2016).
  12. European Commission. (2010). Communication and Visibility Manual for EU External Actions. Available online (accessed September 25, 2016).
  13. European Commission. (2017). Countries and Regions: Brazil. Available online (accessed September 26, 2016).
  14. Final Country Report—Brazil. (2015). Public Opinion Survey on the Perception of the EU and EU’s Policies Abroad. PPMI, NCRE, NFG, September 14, 2015. Available online (accessed September 25, 2016).
  15. Fioramonti, L., & Poletti, A. (2008). Facing the Giant: Southern Perspectives on the European Union. Third World Quarterly, 29(1), 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guimarães, C., & Piefer, N. (2017). Brazil: (Future) Green Energy Power and Strategic Partner for the EU? Comparative European Politics, 15(1), 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hansen, L. (2006). Security as Practice. Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Jackson, R. (2005). Writing the War on Terrorism: Language, Politics and Counter-Terrorism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lehne, S. (2016). EU Global Strategy, a Triumph of Hope Over Experience. Carnegie Europe. Available online (accessed September 2, 2016).
  20. Manners, I. (2002). Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms? Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 235–258.Google Scholar
  21. Manners, I., & Whitman, R. (2013). Normative Power and the Future of EU Public Diplomacy. In M. K. Davis Cross & J. Melissen (Eds.), European Public Diplomacy Soft Power at Work. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. Milliken, J. (1999). The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods. European Journal of International Relations, 5(2), 225–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Miskimmon, A., O’Loughlin, B., & Roselle, L. (2012). Forging the World: Strategic Narratives and International Relations. London: Royal Holloway, University of London.Google Scholar
  24. Miskimmon, A., O’Loughlin, B., & Roselle, L. (2013). Strategic Narratives: Communication Power and the New World Order. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. PPMI/NCRE/NFG. (2015). Analysis of the Perception of the EU and EU’s Policies Abroad—Final Report. December 7, 2015. Available online (accessed September 25, 2016).
  26. Ribeiro Hoffmann, A. (2010). Between Power Politics and Utopia: A Brazilian Perspective on European International Role. In H. Brunkhorst & G. Groezinger (Org.), The Study of Europe (pp. 35–49). Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Saraiva, M. G. (2010). Brazil’s View on Europe. Policy Brief, 44, 44.Google Scholar
  28. Saraiva, M. G. (2012). Brazil’s Strategies and Partnerships: The Place of the European Union. Perspectives (Prague, Print), 20(2), 45–62.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paula Sandrin
    • 1
  • Andrea Ribeiro Hoffmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de Relações InternacionaisPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations