• Mustafa Kutlay
Part of the International Political Economy Series book series (IPES)


Kutlay addresses two interrelated research questions: What are the dynamics of reform cycles in reactive states? When and how economic crises lead to paradigmatic reforms? The chapter makes an introduction to the political economy of contemporary Turkey and Greece to address these questions. The comparison of the Turkish and Greek cases poses interesting puzzles in addressing these main research questions. Despite weak state capacity in both cases and despite deep economic crises hit two countries, paradigmatic changes were initiated in Turkey, while an opposite trend prevailed in Greece. The chapter also introduces the logic of case selection and outlines the organization of chapters.


  1. Boin, Arjen, Allan McConnell, and Paul ‘t Hart. Governing After Crisis: The Politics of Investigation, Accountability and Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  2. Chang, Ha-Joon. Globalization, Economic Development and the Role of the State. London and New York: Zed Books, 2004.Google Scholar
  3. Chardas, Anastassios. “State Capacity and ‘Embeddedness’ in the Context of the European Union’s Regional Policy: The Case of Greece and the Third Community Support Framework (CSF).” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 12, no. 2 (2012): 221–242.Google Scholar
  4. Evans, Peter. “The Eclipse of the State? Reflections on Stateness in an Era of Globalization”. World Politics 50, no. 1 (1997): 62–87.Google Scholar
  5. George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  6. Haggard, Stephan, and Robert R. Kaufman, eds. The Politics of Economic Adjustment. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  7. Hill, Hal. “The Political Economy of Policy Reform: Insights from Southeast Asia.” Asian Development Review 30, no. 1 (2013): 108–130.Google Scholar
  8. Kalaycıoğlu, Ersin. “Turkish Democracy: Patronage versus Governance.” Turkish Studies 2, no. 1 (2001): 54–70.Google Scholar
  9. Ladi, Stella. “Austerity Politics and Administrative Reform: The Eurozone Crisis and Its Impact upon Greek Public Administration.” Comparative European Politics 12, no. 2 (2014): 184–208.Google Scholar
  10. Lavdas, Kostas. The Europeanization of Greece. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1997.Google Scholar
  11. Legro, Jeffrey W. “The Transformation of Policy Ideas.” American Journal of Political Science 44, no. 3 (2000): 419–432.Google Scholar
  12. Mahoney, James, and Dietrich Rueschemeyer. Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  13. Monastiriotis, Vassilis, and Andreas Antoniades. “Reform That! Greece’s Failing Reform Technology: Beyond ‘Vested Interests’ and ‘Political Exchange’.” In From Stagnation To Forced Adjustment: Reforms In Greece, 1974–2010, edited by Stathis Kalyvas, George Pagoulatos, and Haris Tsoukas, 31–47. London and New York: Hurst Co. and Columbia University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
  14. Öniş, Ziya, and Fikret Şenses. Global Dynamics, Domestic Coalitions and Reactive State: Major Policy Shifts in Post-War Turkish Economic Development METU Studies in Development, no. 34 (2007): 251–286.Google Scholar
  15. Pappas, Takis S. “Why Greece Failed?” Journal of Democracy 24, no. 2 (2013): 31–45.Google Scholar
  16. Rodrik, Dani. “Understanding Economic Policy Reform.” Journal of Economic Literature XXXIV (1996): 9–41.Google Scholar
  17. Tarrow, Sidney. “Bridging the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 89, no. 2 (1995): 471–474.Google Scholar
  18. Weiss, Linda. The Myth of the Powerless State: Governing the Economy in a Global Era. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mustafa Kutlay
    • 1
  1. 1.City University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations