Concluding Remarks

  • Christian FleckEmail author
  • Matthias Duller
  • Victor Karády
Part of the Socio-Historical Studies of the Social and Human Sciences book series (SHSSHS)


In the concluding remarks, the editors reflect upon lacunae and implications of the chapters presented before. We discuss the legitimacy of choosing nation states as levels of analysis, the problem of international cooperation in the SSH and the absence of useful typologies of countries in the sphere of higher education as well as possible indicators upon which such typologies could be built. Using our own data as well as data from international organizations, we ask furthermore why disciplines show different growth rates between countries and over time. While we are unable to present detailed explanations of the growth of disciplines, we offer two more abstract ‘models’ indicating what we believe determines different growth rates of disciplines in international comparison.


Methodological nationalism Indexicality Knowledge, growth rates Scientific disciplines International comparison Higher education systems, governance Academic freedom Research financing 


  1. Altbach, Philip G., Liz Reisberg, and Laura E. Rumbley. 2009. Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution; a report prepared for the UNESCO 2009 World Conference on higher education. Paris: UNESCO.
  2. Bartelse, Jeroen, and Frans van Vught. 2007. Institional [sic!] profiles: Towards a typology of higher education institutions in Europe. IAU Horizons 13 (2–3): 9–11.Google Scholar
  3. Boumans, Marcel. 2014. Haavelmo’s epistemology for an inexact science. History of Political Economy 46 (2): 211–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1988. Homo academicus. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Caplow, Theodore, and Reece McGee. [1958] 2001. The academic marketplace. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Davies, Norman. 1996. Europe: A history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Fielden, John. 2008. Global trends in university governance. Education Working Paper Series 9.Google Scholar
  9. Fleck, Christian, and Barbara Hönig. 2014. European sociology: Its size, shape, and ‘excellence’. In Routledge handbook of European sociology, vol. 1, ed. Sokratis M. Koniordos and Alexandros-Andreas Kyrtsēs, 40–66. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Gibbons, Michael (ed.). 1994. The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Hall, Peter A., and David W. Soskice. 2001. Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hallin, Daniel C., and Paolo Mancini. 2004. Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Communication, society and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hausman, Daniel M. 1992. The inexact and separate science of economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heilbron, Johan, Madeline Bedecarré, and Rob Timans. 2017. European journals in the social sciences and humanities. Serendipities: Journal for the Sociology and History of the Social Sciences 2 (1): 33–49.
  15. Helmer, Olaf, and Nicholas Rescher. 1959. On the epistemology of the inexact sciences. Management Science: Journal of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences 6: 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hénard, Fabrice, and Alexander Mitterle. n.d. [2009]. Governance and quality guidelines in higher education: A review on governance arrangements and quality assurance guidelines.
  17. Kropp, Kristoffer. 2017. The cases of the European values study and the European social survey—European constellations of social science knowledge production. Serendipities: Journal for the Sociology and History of the Social Sciences 2 (1): 50–68. Scholar
  18. Lutter, Mark, and Martin Schröder. 2016. Who becomes a tenured professor, and why? Panel data evidence from German sociology, 1980–2013. Research Policy 45 (5): 999–1013. Scholar
  19. Martins, Herminio. 1974. Time and theory in sociology. In Approaches to sociology: An introduction to major trends in British sociology, ed. John Rex, 246–294. International library of sociology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  20. Musselin, Christine. 2010. The market for academics. Studies in higher education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Nowotny, Helga, Peter Scott, and Michael Gibbons (eds.). 2001. Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  22. OECD. 2016. Education at a Glance 2016. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  23. Paradeise, Catherine, Emanuela Reale, Ivar Bleiklie, and Ewan Ferlie. 2009. University governance: Western European comparative perspectives. Higher education dynamics. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Santiago, Paulo, Karine Tremblay, Ester Basri, and Elena Arnal. 2008. Special features: Equity, innovation, labour market, internationalisation. Tertiary education for the knowledge society, vol. 2. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  25. Schögler, Rafael, and Thomas König. 2017. Thematic research funding in the European union: What is expected from social scientific knowledge-making? Serendipities. Journal for the Sociology and History of the Social Sciences 2 (1): 107–130. Scholar
  26. Searle, John R. 2005. What is an institution? Journal of Institutional Economics 1 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith, Anthony D. 1983. Nationalism and classical social theory. British Journal of Sociology 34: 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. van Vught, F.A. et al. 2010. U-Map: The European classification of higher education institutions.
  29. Wimmer, Andreas, and Nina G. Schiller. 2002. Methodological nationalism and beyond: Nation-state building, migration and the social sciences. Global Networks 2 (4): 301–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ziegele, Frank. 2013. Classification of higher education institutions: The European case. Pensamiento Educativo. Rivista de Investigación Educacional Latinoamericana 50 (1): 76–95.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Fleck
    • 1
    Email author
  • Matthias Duller
    • 1
  • Victor Karády
    • 2
  1. 1.University of GrazGrazAustria
  2. 2.Central European UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations