Advertisement

How to Induce Arrhythmias by Atrial and Ventricular Programmed Stimulation?

  • Celestino Sardu
  • Valerio Giordano
  • Antongiulio Donatiello
  • Raffaele Marfella
  • Giuseppe Paolisso
  • Maria Rosaria Rizzo
  • Michelangela Barbieri
Chapter

Abstract

In recent decades, invasive electrophysiological study (ES) has become an important instrument to evaluate patients with conduction disturbance and cardiac arrhythmias. Using catheters placed in heart chambers via central vein and/or central arterial access, ES may evaluate sinus node function, atrioventricular conduction, and tachyarrhythmias. Cardiac arrhythmias may not always be present in the baseline condition. Therefore, it is necessary to induce these arrhythmias by programmed pacing protocols. Commonly arrhythmias are seen as chaotic alterations of the normal heart conduction and of the normal heart rhythm, and then they are defined as cardiac rhythm disorders. Cardiac arrhythmias present with a common phenotype, characterized by irregularity of the cardiac rhythm and related clinical symptoms. In this setting, ES may be performed by using different diagnostic and pacing catheters and pacing protocols. Programmed pacing protocols involve incremental pacing, coupled with the introduction of single or multiple premature stimuli during one or more drive cycles. The pacing protocols are performed with a current output of twice the diastolic threshold or more, and at one or more sites. Therefore, a great discrepancy may exist between arrhythmia induction techniques in different laboratories. However, in the majority of cases, arrhythmias are due to specific arrhythmic electrical, anatomical, and/or electroanatomical circuits. These circuits respond to specific conduction properties of the systolic and diastolic electrical phases, which are reproducible and evocable by external triggers and by specific pacing techniques. Moreover, in the light of these observations, we have to stress the concept that induction and stimulation programs have to be selected and then paced to test the arrhythmic circuits for refractoriness and to trigger the conduction properties of the arrhythmic pathways. Therefore, we have to make arrhythmia induction protocols more uniform and as standardized as possible to avoid all possible bias. Indeed, how to induce arrhythmias by atrial and ventricular stimulation remains a relevant question that needs a specific and unique response. To respond to this question, we would like to introduce the concept that a pacing protocol to induce cardiac arrhythmias may be standard and programmed. As first, by programmed pacing, physicians may study the properties of the cardiac conduction system. This may be secondarily achieved by introduction of early stimuli to determine the conduction response, as a specific arrhythmia induction protocol. As discussed earlier, the type of induction and the chosen programmed stimulation protocol may be selected with regard to the type of arrhythmia the patient is suspected to have. In fact, re-entry tachycardias may usually be triggered using extrastimuli to stimulate the conduction pathways in slow conduction and fast conduction ways. Differently, automatic tachycardias not due to re-entry mechanisms may be more easily induced by burst pacing. In this chapter we would like to introduce pacing protocols to induce cardiac arrhythmias. Apart from the similarity of the diagnostic and pacing catheters, and in the setting of programmed stimulation protocols, the differences in the paced heart chambers and in the induced tachycardias teach us to separate the discussion of atrial stimulation from ventricular stimulation protocols. Therefore, we schematically divide the arrhythmia induction protocols into two separate chapter sections, discussing atrial stimulation protocols and ventricular stimulation protocols.

References

  1. 1.
    Scheinman MM, Morady F. Invasive cardiac electrophysiologic testing: the current state of art. Circulation. 1983;67:1169–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Josephson ME. Clinical cardiac electrophysiology: techniques and interpretations. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Williams; 2008.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Manolis AS, Cameron J, Deering T, Han EH, Estes NAM. Sensitivity and specificity of programmed atrial stimulation for induction of supraventricular tachycardias. Clin Cardiol. 1988;11:307–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Csanadi Z, Klein GJ, Yee R, Thakur RK, Li H. Effect of dual atrioventricular node pathways on atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia. Circulation. 1995;91:2614–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brignole M, Menozzi C, Sartore B, Barra M, Monducci I. The use of atrial pacing to induce atrial fibrillation and flutter. Int J Cardiol. 1986;12:45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Calvo D, Atienza L, Jalife J, Martínez-Alzamora N, Bravo L, Almendral J, et al. High-rate pacing-induced atrial fibrillation effectively reveals properties of spontaneously occurring paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in humans. Europace. 2012;14:1560–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brugada P, Green M, Abdollah H, Wellens HJ. Significance of ventricular arrhythmias initiated by programmed ventricular stimulation: the importance of the type of ventricular arrhythmia induced and the number of premature stimuli required. Circulation. 1984;69:87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wellens HJJ, Brugada P, Stevenson WG. Programmed electrical stimulation of the heart in patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias: what is the significance of induced arrhythmias and what is the correct stimulation protocol? Circulation. 1985;72:1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Spielman SR, Farshidi A, Horowitz LN, Josephson ME. Ventricular fibrillation during programmed ventricular stimulation: incidence and clinical implications. Am J Cardiol. 1978;42:913–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mann DE, Luck JC, Griffin JC, Herre JM, Limacher MC, Magro SA, et al. Induction of ventricular tachycardia using programmed stimulation: value of third and fourth extrastimuli. Am J Cardiol. 1983;52:501–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Herre JM, Mann DE, Luck JC, Magro SA, Figali S, Breen T, et al. Effect of increased current, multiple pacing sites and number of extrastimuli on induction of ventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol. 1986;57:102–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sardu C, Carreras G, Katsanos S, Kamperidis V, Pace MC, Passavanti MB, et al. Metabolic syndrome is associated with a poor outcome in patients affected by outflow tract premature ventricular contractions treated by catheter ablation. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2014;14:176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Platia EV, Reid PR. Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia during programmed ventricular stimulation: criteria for a positive test. Am J Cardiol. 1985;56:79–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Celestino Sardu
    • 1
  • Valerio Giordano
    • 2
  • Antongiulio Donatiello
    • 3
  • Raffaele Marfella
    • 4
  • Giuseppe Paolisso
    • 4
  • Maria Rosaria Rizzo
    • 4
  • Michelangela Barbieri
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Aging SciencesUniversita degli Studi della Campania Luigi VanviteliCasertaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Arrhythmias and Cardiovascular DiseasesClinic Center “Nostra Signora di Lourdes” HospitalNaplesItaly
  3. 3.FTE AF DivisionAbbottMilanItaly
  4. 4.Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Aging SciencesUniversity of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”NaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations