Plea Negotiations and Sentencing

  • Asher Flynn
  • Arie Freiberg
Part of the Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies book series (PSLS)


Plea negotiations and sentencing are inextricably linked. While it is argued that sentencing is not a feature of Australian negotiations, this study found that discussions on sentencing are in fact a key component of negotiations. This chapter examines connections between various sentencing regimes, policies and negotiations. In particular, it examines the effect of mandatory and presumptive sentencing on plea negotiations; the use of sentence indications to encourage defendants to plead guilty (as an extension of the negotiation process); the role sentencing plays in discussions, including the effect of the High Court’s decision in Barbaro; and the requirement in Victoria that courts must state the sentence they would have imposed but for a guilty plea, as part of a transparent sentence discount process.


Plea negotiations Sentencing Guilty plea Sentence discount Barbaro MacNeil-Brown Discretion Mandatory sentencing S 6AAA 



  1. Aas, K F 2005, Sentencing in the age of information: from Faust to Macintosh, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  2. Ananian-Walsh, R & Gover, K (2015), ‘Before the High Court – Commonwealth v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate: the end of penalty agreements in civil pecuniary penalty schemes?’, Sydney Law Review, vol. 37, pp. 417–35.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Law Reform Commission [ALRC] 2006, Same crime, same time: sentencing of federal offenders (Report #103, 2006).Google Scholar
  4. Bagaric, M 2014, ‘The need for legislative action to negate the impact of Barbaro v The Queen’, Criminal Law Journal, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 133–5.Google Scholar
  5. Flynn, A 2009, ‘Sentence indications for indictable offences: increasing court efficiency at the expense of justice – a response to the Victorian legislation’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 244–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Flynn, A 2010a, ‘An indication of injustice: an analysis of the problems inherent to maintaining the sentence indication scheme in Victoria’s Higher Courts’, Flinders Law Journal, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 41–78.Google Scholar
  7. Flynn, A 2010b, ‘Victoria’s Legal Aid funding structure: hindering the ideals inherent to the pre-trial process’, Criminal Law Journal, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 48–63.Google Scholar
  8. Flynn, A 2016, ‘Plea negotiations, prosecutors and discretion: an argument for legal reform’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 564–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Freiberg, A & Fox, R G 1987, ‘Silence is not golden: the functions of prosecutors at sentencing in Victoria’, Law Institute Journal, vol. 61, p. 554.Google Scholar
  10. Freiberg, A & Murray, S 2012, ‘Constitutional perspectives on sentencing: some challenging issues’, Criminal Law Journal, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 335–55.Google Scholar
  11. Freiberg, A & Willis, J 2003, ‘Sentence indication’, Criminal Law Journal, vol. 27, pp. 246–59.Google Scholar
  12. Harris, J & Jesilow, P 2006, ‘It’s not the old ball game: three strikes and the courtroom workgroup’, Justice Quarterly, vol. 17, pp. 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harris, K 2003, ‘Moving into the new millennium: towards a feminist vision of justice’, in E McLaughlin, R Fergusson, G Hughes & L Westmarland (eds), Restorative justice: critical issues, pp. 31–49, Sage, London.Google Scholar
  14. Jamieson, P 2009, ‘Sentence indication in the Supreme Court: a Victorian initiative’, Journal of Judicial Administration, vol. 18, pp. 169–77.Google Scholar
  15. Law Council of Australia 2014, Mandatory sentencing, Policy Discussion Paper, Law Council of Australia, Canberra.Google Scholar
  16. Law Institute of Victoria [LIV] 2011b, Mandatory minimum sentencing, Submission to the Attorney-General, June 2011, LIV. Available from: [accessed 18 January 2016].
  17. Mack, K & Roach Anleu, S 1995, Pleading guilty: issues and practices, Australian Institute of Judicial Administration, Victoria.Google Scholar
  18. Mallet, S 2015, ‘Judicial discretion in sentencing: a justice system that is no longer just?’, Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Paper, Student/Alumni Paper, no. 37, pp. 533–71.Google Scholar
  19. McConville, M & Marsh, L 2014, Criminal judges: legitimacy, courts and state-induced guilty pleas in Britain, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McCoy, C 1990, Politics and plea bargaining: victims’ rights in California, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  21. New Zealand Law Reform Commission 2005, Criminal pre-trial processes: justice through efficiency (Report #89 2005).Google Scholar
  22. Queensland Government 2016, Media statements, The Queensland Cabinet and Ministerial Directory. Available from: [accessed 18 January 2016].
  23. Rakoff, J S 2014, ‘Why innocent people plead guilty’, NY Books, November 20 issue. Available from: [accessed 18 January 2016].
  24. Simon, J 2007, Governing through crime: how the war on crime transformed American democracy and created a culture of fear, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Solonec, T 2015, ‘“Tough on crime”: discrimination by another name – the legacy of mandatory sentencing in Western Australia’, Indigenous Law Bulletin, vol. 8, no. 18, pp. 7–11.Google Scholar
  26. Spears, D, Poletti, P & MacKinnell, I 1994, Sentencing indication hearings pilot scheme, Judicial Commission New South Wales.Google Scholar
  27. United Kingdom Office of the Attorney-General 2007, Fraud review: final report, Office of the Attorney-General’s Department, London.Google Scholar
  28. Victoria Legal Aid [VLA] 2016c, Sentencing guidance reference, Submission to the Victorian Sentencing Advisory Council, 12 February, VLA.Google Scholar
  29. Victorian Department of Justice 2004, New directions for the Victorian justice system 2004–2014 (27 May 2004).Google Scholar
  30. Victorian Sentencing Advisory Council [SAC] 2007, Sentence indications and specified sentence discounts: final report, SAC, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  31. Victorian Sentencing Advisory Council [SAC] 2008, Criminal justice diversion program in Victoria: a statistical profile, SAC, Melbourne. Available from: [accessed 18 January 2016].
  32. Victorian Sentencing Advisory Council [SAC] 2010, Sentence indication: a report on the pilot scheme, SAC. Available from: default/files/publication-documents/Sentence%20Indication%20A%20Report%20on %20the%20Pilot%20Scheme.pdf [accessed 18 January 2016].
  33. Victorian Sentencing Advisory Council [SAC] 2011, Statutory minimum sentences for gross violence offences – report, SAC. Available from: [accessed 28 February 2017].
  34. Victorian Sentencing Advisory Council [SAC] 2012, Baseline sentencing – report, SAC. Available from: ion-documents/Baseline%20Sentencing%20Report.pdf [accessed 28 February 2017].
  35. Victorian Sentencing Advisory Council [SAC] 2015, Guilty pleas in the higher courts: rates, timing, and discounts, Sentencing Advisory Council, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  36. Weatherburn, D & Lind, B 1995, ‘The impact of the New South Wales sentence indication scheme on plea rates and case delay’, UNSW Law Journal, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 211–31.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Asher Flynn
    • 1
  • Arie Freiberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Monash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations