Other Forms of Negotiations

  • Asher Flynn
  • Arie Freiberg
Part of the Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies book series (PSLS)


Discussions of plea negotiations have generally focused on three main forms: charge bargaining (withdrawing and/or substituting charges), fact bargaining (agreements as to which “facts” form the basis of the summary from which the defendant is sentenced) and sentence bargaining (discussions on the prosecutor’s sentencing submission and agreements as to when the defendant indicated an intention to plead guilty). However this study identified 14 different forms of plea negotiation. This chapter discusses these forms of plea negotiation showcasing the diversity and extent of outcomes possible from plea negotiations. In doing so, it demonstrates the breadth and variety of outcomes that can emerge from a defendant agreeing to waive their right to a trial and enter a guilty plea.


Plea negotiations Plea bargaining Plea deals Negotiations Plea agreements Prosecutorial discretion 



  1. ABC 2010, ‘Carl Williams bashed and killed in jail’, ABC, 20 April. Available from: [accessed 18 January 2016].
  2. Chen, K 2013, ‘Pressures to plead guilty. Factors affecting plea decisions in Hong Kong’s magistrates’ courts’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 257–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Corrections Victoria 2017, Annual Prisoner Statistical Profile 2006-07-2015-16, Corrections Victoria. Available from: [accessed 8 February 2018].
  4. Euvrard, E & Leclerc, C 2017, ‘Pre-trial detention and guilty pleas: Inducement or coercion’, Punishment and Society, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 525–542.Google Scholar
  5. Flynn, A 2016, ‘Plea negotiations, prosecutors and discretion: an argument for legal reform’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 564–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fox, R & Deltondo, N 2015, Victorian criminal procedure, The Federation Press, New South Wales.Google Scholar
  7. Freiberg, A 2014, Fox and Freiberg’s sentencing: state and federal law in Victoria (3rd edn), Thomson Reuters, Sydney.Google Scholar
  8. Gazal-Ayal, O & Tor, A 2012, ‘The innocence effect’, Duke Law Journal, vol. 62, pp. 339–401.Google Scholar
  9. Johns, R 2002, Victims and plea bargaining: victims of crime – plea bargains, compensation, victim impact statements and support services briefing paper. Available from: [accessed 18 January 2016].
  10. Kellough, G & Wortley, S 2002, ‘Remand for plea: Bail decisions and plea bargaining as commensurate decision’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 186–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mackenzie, G, Vincent, A & Zeleznikow, J 2015, ‘Negotiating about charges and pleas: balancing interests and justice’, Group Decision and Negotiation, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 577–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Manikis, M 2012, ‘Recognizing victims’ role and rights during plea bargaining: a fair deal for victims of crime’, Criminal Law Quarterly, vol. 58, no. 3–4, p. 411.Google Scholar
  13. Victorian Sentencing Advisory Council [SAC] 2008, Criminal justice diversion program in Victoria: a statistical profile, SAC, Melbourne. Available from: [accessed 18 January 2016].
  14. Victorian Sentencing Advisory Council [SAC] 2016c, Victoria’s Prison Population 2005–2016, November 2016, VSAC, Melbourne. Available from: Victorias_Prison_Population_2005_to_2016.pdf [accessed 29 December 2017].
  15. Wren, E & Bartels, L 2014, ‘“Guilty, Your Honour”: recent legislative developments on the guilty plea discount and an Australian Capital Territory case study on its operation’, Adelaide Law Review, vol. 35, pp. 361–84.Google Scholar
  16. Yang, K 2013, ‘Public accountability of public prosecutions’, Murdoch University Law Review, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 28–75.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Asher Flynn
    • 1
  • Arie Freiberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Monash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations