Advertisement

Polymeric Composite Films with Controlled Release of Natural Antioxidant Enoxil

  • Roman Kozakevych
  • Yulia Bolbukh
  • Lucian Lupascu
  • Tudor Lupascu
  • Valentin Tertykh
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Physics book series (SPPHY, volume 214)

Abstract

The investigation was devoted to elaboration of effective carriers of biological active substrate based on natural tannins, namely, Enoxil. Several types of carriers based on silica or biocompatible natural polymers were synthesized and tested. Silica-containing composites have been prepared by impregnation of fumed silica with Enoxil and by sol-gel silica formation into the Enoxil solution. Polymeric films were composed by mixing of gelatin (Gel), chitosan (Chit), and 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate (HEMA) in different proportions and compositions. Obtained materials were characterized using FTIR, ATR, and DSC. All materials were tested in vitro release and antibacterial static activity. The release rate of Enoxil from the carrier based on fumed silica A-300 was much higher compared with the liberation rate from the composites prepared by sol-gel method. The prolonged release of active substrate was obtained by use of the silica gel with phenolic groups as a carrier. Polymeric films based on gelatin/chitosan were found to show the highest swelling degree and reduced release. The composition with HEMA had more rigid structure, but the best carrier in this line samples was Gel/HEMA composite cross-linked with mixture of functional amino- and vinylsilane (Gel/HEMA/VA).

Keywords

Fumed and modified silicas Chitosan Gelatin HEMA Enoxil Controlled release system 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research leading to these results has received funding from the People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007–2013/ under REA grant agreement no PIRSES-GA-2013-612484, “NANOBIOMAT.”

Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Sytar O, Hemmerich I, Zivcak M, Rauh C, Brestic M (2016) Comparative analysis of bioactive phenolic compounds composition from 26 medicinal plants. Saudi J Biol Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.01.036
  2. 2.
    Tringali C (2001) Bioactive compounds from natural sources: isolation, characterization and biological properties. Phytother Res 16(6):503–602Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lupascu TGA (2011) Studies on the antioxidant activity of the compound Enoxil and its related forms. Chem J Moldova 6(2):58–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ivanova D, Gerova D, Chervenkov T, Yankova T (2005) Polyphenols and antioxidant capacity of Bulgarian medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol 96(1):145–150 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2004.08.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu H, Qiu N, Ding H, Yao R (2008) Polyphenols contents and antioxidant capacity of 68 Chinese herbals suitable for medical or food uses. Food Res Int 41(4):363–370 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2007.12.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Manach C, Mazur A, Scalbert A (2005) Polyphenols and prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Curr Opin Lipidol 16(1):77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aprioku JS (2013) Pharmacology of free radicals and the impact of reactive oxygen species on the testis. J Reprod Infertility 14(4):158–172Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hellinger WC (2000) Confronting the problem of increasing antibiotic resistance. South Med J 93(9):842–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Esquenazi DWM, Miranda MM, Rodrigues HM, Tostes JB, Rozental S, Silva AJ, Alviano CS (2002) Antimicrobial and antiviral activities of polyphenolics from Cocos nucifera Linn. (Palmae) husk fiber extract. Res Microbiol 10(153):647–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Daglia M (2012) Polyphenols as antimicrobial agents. Curr Opin Biotechnol 23(2):174–181 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2011.08.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lucian Lupaşcu VR, Cotos V, Lupaşcu T (2010) Antimicrobial activity of the autochthonous compound Enoxil. J Biomed Sci Eng 3:758–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Turov VV, Lupascu T, Krupska TV, Povar I (2015) Nanosilica A-300 influence on water structures formed on the bioactive agent Enoxil. Can J Chem 94(1):88–94.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cjc-2015-0360 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kuzema PO, Laguta IV, Stavinskaya ON, Kazakova OA, Borysenko MV, Lupaşcu T (2016) Preparation and characterization of silica-Enoxil Nanobiocomposites. Nanoscale Res Lett 11(1):68.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-016-1287-y CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yao KD, Yin YJ, Xu MX, Wang YF (1995) Investigation of pH-sensitive drug delivery system of chitosan/gelatin hybrid polymer network. Polym Int 38(1):77–82.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.1995.210380110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zaman HU, MAK RAK (2012) Studies on the thermo-mechanical properties of gelatin based films using 2-Hydroxyethyl methacrylate by gamma radiation. OJCM 2(1):15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bolbukh Y, Klonos P, Roumpos K et al (2016) Glass transition and hydration properties of polyhydroxyethylmethacrylate filled with modified silica nanoparticles. J Therm Anal Calorim 125(3):1387–1398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bolbukh Y, Tertykh V, Klonos P, Pissis P (2012) DSC study of polyhydroxyethylmethacrylate filled with modified silicas. J Therm Anal Calorim 108(3):1111–1119.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-011-2030-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roman Kozakevych
    • 1
  • Yulia Bolbukh
    • 1
  • Lucian Lupascu
    • 2
  • Tudor Lupascu
    • 2
  • Valentin Tertykh
    • 1
  1. 1.Chuiko Institute of Surface Chemistry, National Academy of Sciences of UkraineKyivUkraine
  2. 2.Institute of Chemistry of the Academy of Sciences of MoldovaChisinauRepublic of Moldova

Personalised recommendations