Part VI: Commentary – Broadening Mathematical Understanding Through Content

  • Plinio Cavalcanti Moreira
Part of the Advances in Mathematics Education book series (AME)


I will be making some notes on ideas expressed by the authors along the chapters of this Part VI, hoping that my comments will illustrate the fact that the chapters are rich enough to foster interesting reflections, even when analyzed from an external (possibly divergent) point of view. Therefore, in authoring this Commentary Chapter, my purpose is that of producing a hopefully consistent counterpoint, in the musical sense, to the ideas presented by the authors in their respective chapters.


  1. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bednarz, N., & Proulx, J. (2009). Knowing and using mathematics in teaching: Conceptual and epistemological clarifications. For the Learning of Mathematics, 29(3), 11–17.Google Scholar
  3. Cajori, F. (1928). A history of mathematical notation (Vol. I). London: Open Court Company.Google Scholar
  4. Davis, B., & Renert, M. (2014). The math teachers know: Profound understanding of emergent mathematics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Gray, E. M., & Tall, D. O. (1993). Success and failure in mathematics: The flexible meaning of symbols as process and concept. Mathematics Teaching, 142, 6–10.Google Scholar
  6. Gray, E. M., & Tall, D. O. (1994). Duality, ambiguity and flexibility: A proceptual view of simple arithmetic. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 115–141.Google Scholar
  7. Kline, M. (1974). Why Johnny can’t add: The failure of the new math. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  8. Lins, R. C. (2006). Characterizing the mathematics of the mathematics teacher from the point of view of meaning production. In M. Niss (Ed.), 10th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 1–16). Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  9. Moreira, P. C. (2004). O conhecimento matemático do professor: Formação na licenciatura e prática docente na escola básica. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Faculdade de Educação UFMG, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.Google Scholar
  10. Moreira, P. C., & David, M. M. (2005). A formação matemática do professor: Licenciatura e prática docente escolar. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica.Google Scholar
  11. Moreira, P. C., & David, M. M. (2008). Academic mathematics and mathematical knowledge needed in school teaching practice: Some conflicting elements. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Vinner, S. (1991). The role of definitions in the teaching and learning of mathematics. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 65–81). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Plinio Cavalcanti Moreira
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidade Federal de Ouro PretoOuro PretoBrazil

Personalised recommendations