Abstract
We offer two alternative strategies to simply giving paper-and-pencil mathematics tests that use student thinking as a basis, which we identify as a key underpinning of teaching in problem-solving classrooms. Using student thinking as a basis refers to the idea that teaching is inseparable from, grounded in, and formed by students’ ideas. Specifically, we discuss (1) involving students in developing tests to help them prepare for writing tests and (2) reviewing test material by having students compare, analyze, and critique their classmates’ test responses and subsequently revise their own work. These two strategies are re-castings of the traditional paper-and-pencil test. Teachers can use the strategies to promote deep approaches to learning and, as a result, help students to perform better on tests.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Galbraith, P. (1993). Paradigms, problems and assessment: Some ideological implications. In M. Niss (Ed.), Investigations into assessment in mathematics education (pp. 73–86). Dordrecht: Springer.
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning I: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x.
Marton, F., Dall’Alba, G., & Beaty, E. (1993). Conceptions of learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 19(3), 277–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(93)90015-C.
Miller, C., & Parlett, M. (1974). Up to the mark: A study of the examination game. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematics success for all. Reston: Author.
Rapke, T. (2016). A process of students and their instructor developing a final closed-book mathematics exam. Research in Mathematics Education, 18(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2015.1134342.
Rapke, T. (2017). Involving students in developing math tests. Mathematics Teacher, 110(8), 612–616. Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/publications/mathematics-teacher/.
Rapke, T., & Hall, J. (2016). Summative ~ formative: Exploring novel uses of written exams in an undergraduate mathematics course. In C. A. Shoniregun & G. A. Akmayeva (Eds.), Canada International Conference on Education (CICE-2016) proceedings (pp. 48–51). Mississauga: Infonomics Society.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2014). What makes for powerful classrooms, and how can we support teachers in creating them? A story of research and practice, productively intertwined. Educational Researcher, 43(8), 404–412. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14554450.
Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2005). Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: A review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500099102.
Willingham, D. T. (2002, Summer). Allocating student study time: “Massed” versus “distributed” practice. American Educator, 26, 37–39.
Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(2), 458–477. https://doi.org/10.2307/749877.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rapke, T., Hall, J., Marynowski, R. (2018). Re-Framing Testing to Better Fit Within Problem-solving Classrooms: Ways to Create and Review Tests. In: Kajander, A., Holm, J., Chernoff, E. (eds) Teaching and Learning Secondary School Mathematics. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92390-1_43
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92390-1_43
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92389-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92390-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)