Advertisement

Player Analytic Technologies in Tennis: An Investigation of Non-professional Players’ Personal Values and Perceptual Orientations

  • Sebastian Guevara Martinez
  • Stephan SchlöglEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 850)

Abstract

The use of technology in sports has grown significantly in recent years. Analytic systems, in particular, have changed the way athletes train, execute and evaluate their performance. In tennis, however, the cost for installing, maintaining and operating such systems has so far prevented greater market penetration. While more affordable devices are emerging, their acceptance and consequent adoption remains low, although players and coaches understand their value and usefulness. Exploring hindering factors, the goal of the research presented in this paper was to better understand existing users, so as to identify those device features, which directly link to personal values and hence may be seen as most important for increasing adoption. Interviews with 20 amateur tennis players showed that the video feature seems to be most essential, as it helps players improve their game and consequently increase their competitiveness. Furthermore, they seem strongly interested in the systems’ statistics and ranking functions.

Keywords

Player analytics technology Means-end-chain theory Value perception 

References

  1. 1.
    Gutman, J.: A means-end chain model based on consumer categorization processes. J. Mark. 46, 60–72 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reynolds, T.J., Gutman, J.: Laddering theory, method, analysis, and interpretation. J. Advert. Res. 28, 11–31 (1988)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gutman, J.: A means-end model for facilitating analysis of product markets based on consumer judgement. Adv. Consum. Res. 8, 116–121 (1981)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Walker, B.A., Olson, J.C.: Means-end chains: connecting products with self. J. Bus. Res. 22(2), 111–118 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reynolds, T.J., Perkins, W.S.: Cognitive differentiation analysis: a new methodology for assessing the validity of means-end hierarchies. In: ACR North American Advances (1987)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Saaka, A., Sidon, C., Blake, B.F.: Laddering. a “how to do it” manual-with a note of caution. In: Research Reports in Consumer Behavior: How to Series. Cleveland State University, Ohio (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fotopoulos, C., Krystallis, A., Ness, M.: Consumers motivations in purchasing “new wines” in Greece with emphasis on wine produced by organic grapes1: a means-end chains approach. Zaragoza (Spain) 28, 31 (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leão, A.L.M., Mello, S.C.: The means-end approach to understanding customer values of a on-line newspaper. BAR-Braz. Adm. Rev. 4(1), 1–20 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management, Communication & ITMCI Management Center InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria

Personalised recommendations