Advertisement

Experimental Study Based on Impacts of Time Pressure on Human-Computer Interaction Performance

  • Yi-qian ZhaoEmail author
  • Tian-yu Wu
  • Ya-jun Li
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 850)

Abstract

According to studies, time pressure is a key factor impacting human-computer interaction performance. In an appointed task, the time pressure can be controlled by testing and designing a quota time length. In this paper, simulations and studies were conducted on the impact of time pressure on human-computer interaction performance through numerical calculation and input experiments. Through comparative analysis of experiment data, the impact of time pressure on numerical calculation and input performance, together with the changing pattern, was obtained. The human-computer interaction performance could be promoted if the pattern obtained from the experiment was applied to practical human-computer interactions and a reasonable time pressure was regulated and exerted by setting quota time lengths for specific interaction tasks.

Keywords

Time pressure Quota time Human-computer interaction performance Numerical calculation and input Interaction efficiency Interaction accuracy rate 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This study is supported by the Project supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China (Project No. 16BSH127).

References

  1. 1.
    Ordonez, L., Iii, L.B.: Decisions under time pressure: how time constraint affects risky decision making. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 71(2), 121–140 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baer, M., Oldham, G.R.: The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. J. Appl. Psychol. 91(4), 963–970 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Walrath, L.C., Backs, R.W.: Time stress interacts with coding, density, and search type in visual display search. Hum. Factors Ergonomics Soc. Ann. Meeting Proc. 33(20), 1496–1500 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kawado, M., Hinotsu, S., Matsuyama, Y., et al.: A comparison of error detection rates between the reading aloud method and the double data entry method. Control. Clin. Trials 24(5), 560 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Svenson, O., Edland, A.: Change of preferences under time pressure: choices and judgements. Scand. J. Psychol. 28(4), 322–330 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Design Art and MediaNanjing University of Science and TechnologyNanjingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations