Advertisement

Analysis of the Relationship Between Enterprise Resource Planning Implementation and Firm Performance: Evidence from Turkish SMEs

  • Ahmet Safa Kocaaga
  • Beyzanur Cayir Ervural
  • Omer F. Demirel
  • Selim ZaimEmail author
Conference paper

Abstract

The principal aim of this study is to determine the critical success factors of Enterprise Resources Planning Implementation and to measure their effect on Firm Performance drawing on a sample of 215 SMEs operating in Turkish textile industry. Firm performance was measured using subjective measures relying on executive’s perception of how the firm performed relative to both financial and non-financial performance criteria. The structural equation modelling technique was employed to investigate the relationship between the implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning and Firm Performance. Data analysis reveals that there is a strong positive relationship between Enterprise Resource Planning and organizational performance through Enterprise Resource Planning Performance.

Keywords

Enterprise Resources Planning Implementation Firm performance Enterprise resources planning performance 

References

  1. 1.
    Fui-Hoon Nah F, Lee-Shang Lau J, Kuang J (2001) Critical factors for successful implementation of enterprise systems. Bus Proc Manag J 7(3):285–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kumar V, Maheshwari B, Kumar U (2003) An investigation of critical management issues in ERP implementation: emperical evidence from Canadian organizations. Technovation 23(10):793–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Braggs S (2005) ERP: the state of the industry. Arc. Insights 12 ECL, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Angerosa A (1995) The future looks bright for ERP, APICS—The Performance AdvantageGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wallace TF, Kremzar MH (2001) ERP: making it happen: the implementers’ guide to success with enterprise resource planning. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ehie IC, Madsen M (2005) Identifying critical issues in enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementation. Comput Ind 56(6):545–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hunton JE, Lippincott B, Reck JL (2003) Enterprise resource planning systems: comparing firm performance of adopters and nonadopters. Int J Acc Inform Syst 4(3):165–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Usmanij PA, Khosla R, Chu M-T (2013) Successful product or successful system? User satisfaction measurement of ERP software. J Intell Manuf 24(6):1131–1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Loh TC, Koh SCL (2004) Critical elements for a successful enterprise resource planning implementation in small-and medium-sized enterprises. Int J Prod Res 42(17):3433–3455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Poston R, Grabski S (2001) Financial impacts of enterprise resource planning implementations. Int J Acc Inform Syst 2(4):271–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zviran M, Erlich Z (2003) Measuring is user satisfaction: review and implications. Commun Assoc Inform Syst 12:81–103Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Floyd SW, Zahra SA (1990) The effect of fit between competitive strategy and it adoption on organizational performance in small banks. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 2(4):357–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sun H, Cheng T-K (2002) Comparing reasons, practices and effects of ISO 9000 certification and TQM implementation in Norwegian SMEs and large firms. Int Small Bus J 20(4):421–442MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mcadam R (1999) Life after ISO 9000: an analysis of the impact of ISO 9000 and total quality management on small businesses in Northern Ireland. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell 10:229–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Milfont TL, Duckitt J (2004) The structure of environmental attitudes: a first- and second-order confirmatory factor analysis. J Environ Psychol 24(3):289–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schumacker RE, Lomax RG (2010) A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling, 3rd edn. Routledge, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ahmet Safa Kocaaga
    • 1
  • Beyzanur Cayir Ervural
    • 1
    • 4
  • Omer F. Demirel
    • 2
  • Selim Zaim
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringIstanbul UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of ManagementIbn Haldun UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Industrial EngineeringIstanbul Şehir UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  4. 4.Istanbul Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations