Forest Management for Insects: Issues and Approaches

  • Tim R. New


The complexities of forest insects and their needs present complicated scenarios for their effective conservation, whether efforts are directed to single species or wider communities. Forest management can hamper or support practical insect conservation in many ways, and some of the major themes and issues are outlined in this chapter, with examples of how they may contribute to wider perspectives.


Climate change Control burning Ecological traps Fire regimes Forest corridors Forest reserves for insects Plantations Retention trees Riparian forest Sacred groves Tree hollows Urban forestry Veteran trees 


  1. Adamski P, Bohdan A, Michalcewicz J, Ciach M, Witkowski Z (2016) Timber stacks: potential ecological traps for an endangered saproxylic beetle, the Rosalia longicorn Rosalia alpina. J Insect Conserv 20:1099–1105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrew N, Rodgerson L, York A (2000) Frequent fuel-reduction burning: the role of logs and associated leaf litter in the conservation of ant biodiversity. Austral Ecol 25:99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashton LA, Odell EH, Burwell CJ, Maunsell SC, Nakamura A, Mcdonald WJF, Kitching RL (2016) Altitudinal patterns of moth diversity in tropical and subtropical Australian rainforests. Aust Ecol 41:197–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Athayde EA, Cancian LF, Verdade LM, Morellato LPC (2015) Functional and phylogenetic diversity of scattered trees in an agricultural landscape: implications for conservation. Agric Ecosyst Environ 199:272–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker SC, Richardson AMM, Seeman OD, Barmuta LA (2004) Does clearfell, burn and sow silviculture mimic the effect of wildfire? A field study and review using litter beetles. For Ecol Manag 199:433–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banks JCG, Brack CL (2003) Canberra’s urban forest: evolution and planning for future landscapes. Urb For Urb Green 1:151–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bazelet CS, Samways MJ (2011) Grasshopper assemblage response to conservation ecological networks in a timber plantation matrix. Agric Ecosyst Environ 144:124–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berg SA, Bergman K-O, Wissman J, Zmihorski M, Ockinger E (2016) Power-line corridors as source habitats for butterflies in forest landscapes. Biol Conserv 201:320–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bojorquez-Tapia LA, Brower LP, Castilleja G, Sanchez-Colon S, Hernandez M et al (2003) Mapping expert knowledge: redesigning the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve. Conserv Biol 17:367–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bossart JL, Antwi JB (2016) Limited erosion of genetic and species diversity from small forest patches: sacred forest groves in an Afrotropical biodiversity hotspot have high conservation value for butterflies. Biol Conserv 198: 122–134Google Scholar
  11. Bouget C, Larrieu L, Brin A (2014) Key features for saproxylic beetle diversity derived from rapid habitat assessment in temperate forests. Ecol Indic 36:656–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carpaneto GM, Mazziotta A, Coletti G, Luiselli L, Audisio P (2010) Conflict between insect conservation and public safety: the case of a saproxylic beetle (Osmoderma eremita) in urban parks. J Insect Conserv 14:555–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) (2009) Year in review 2009. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, MontrealGoogle Scholar
  14. Chiari A, Bardiani M, Zauki A, Hardersen S, Mason F, Spada L, Campanaro A (2013) Monitoring of the saproxylic beetle Morimus asper (Sulzer, 1776) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) with freshly cut log piles. J Insect Conserv 17:1255–1265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chinellato F, Faccoli M, Marini L, Battisti A (2014) Distribution of Norway spruce bark and wood-boring beetles along Alpine elevational gradients. Agric For Entomol 16:111–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Costello SL, Negron JF, Jacobi WR (2011) Wood-boring insect abundance in fire-injured ponderosa pine. Agric For Entomol 13:373–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Croft P, Hunter JT, Reid N (2016) Forgotten fauna: habitat attributes of long-unburnt forests and woodlands dictate a rethink of fire management theory and practice. For Ecol Manag 366:166–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davies KF, Margules CR (1998) Effects of habitat fragmentation on carabid beetles: experimental evidence. J Anim Ecol 67:460–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davies KF, Melbourne BA, Margules CR (2001) Effects of within- and between-patch processes on community dynamics in a fragmentation experiment. Ecology 82:1830–1846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. de Andrade RB, Balch JK, Carreira JYO, Brando PM, Freitas AVL (2017) The impacts of recurrent fires on diversity of fruit-feeding butterflies in a South-Eastern Amazon forest. J Trop Ecol 33:22–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dudley N (2013) Guidelines for applying protected area management categories including IUCN WCPA best practice guidance on recognised protected areas and assigning management categories and governance types. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. (Available from https;// Scholar
  22. Farmilo BJ, Nimmo DG, Morgan JW (2013) Pine plantations modify local conditions in forest fragments in southeastern Australia: insights from a fragmentation experiment. For Ecol Manag 305:264–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fayle TM, Edwards DP, Foster WA, Yusah KM, Turner EC (2015) An ant-plant by-product mutualism is robust to selective logging of rain forest and conversion to oil palm plantation. Oecologia 178:441–450CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Franklin JF, Berg DR, Thornburgh DA, Tappeiner JC (1997) Alternative sylvicultural systems to timber harvesting: variable retention harvest systems. In Kohm K, Franklin JF (eds) Creating a forestry for the 21st century. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 111–139Google Scholar
  25. Freedman B, Zelazny V, Beaudette D, Fleming T, Johnson G et al (1996) Biodiversity implications of changes in the quality of dead organic matter in managed forests. Environ Revs 4:238–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fuentealba A, Pureswaran D, Bauce E, Depland E (2017) How does synchrony with host plant affect the performance of an outbreakng insect defoliator? Oecologia 184:847–857CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Gandhi KJM, Spence JR, Langor DW, Morgantini LE (2004) Fire residuals as habitat reserves for epigaeic beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae and Staphylinidae). Biol Conserv 102:131–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gaublomme E, Hendrickx F, Dhuyvetter H, Desender K (2008) The effects of forest patch size and matrix type on changes in carabid beetle assemblages in an urbanized landscape. Biol Conserv 141:2585–2596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Geldmann J, Barnes M, Coad L, Craigie ID, Hockings M, Burgess ND (2013) Effectiveness of terrestrial protected areas in reducing habitat loss and population declines. Biol Conserv 161:230–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gibbons P, Lindenmayer DB (1996) Issues associated with the retention of hollow-bearing trees within eucalypt forests managed for wood production. For Ecol Manag 83:245–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gough LA, Birkemoe T, Sverdrup-Thygeson A (2014) Reactive forest management can also be proactive for wood-living beetles in hollow oak trees. Biol Conserv 180:75–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gouix N, Sebek P, Valladares L, Brustel H, Brin A (2015) Habitat requirements of the violet click beetle (Limoniscus violaceus), an endangered umbrella species of basal tree hollows. Insect Conserv Divers 8:418–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gray CL, Slade EM, Mann DJ, Lewis OT (2014) Do riparian reserves support dung beetle biodiversity and ecosystem services in oil palm-dominated tropical landscapes? Ecol Evol 4:1049–1060CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Gustafsson L, Kouki J, Sverdrup-Thygeson A (2010) Tree retention as a conservation measure in clear-cut forests of northern Europe: a review of ecological consequences. Scand J For Res 25:295–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gustafsson L, Baker SC, Bauhaus J, Beese WJ, Brodie A et al (2012) Retention forestry to maintain multifunctional forests: a world perspective. BioScience 62:633–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hedin J, Isacsson G, Jonsell M, Komonen A (2008) Forest fuel piles as ecological traps for saproxylic beetles in oak. Scand J For Res 23:348–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hedwall P-O, Mikusinski G (2015) Structural changes in protected forests in Sweden: implications for conservation functionality. Can J For Res 45:1215–1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Heikkala O, Martikainen P, Kouki J (2017) Prescribed burning is an effective and quick method to conserve rare pyrophilous forest-dwelling flat bugs. Insect Conserv Divers 10:32–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hilszczanski J, Jaworski T, Plewa R, Jansson N (2014) Surrogate tree cavities: boxes with artificial substrate can serve as temporary habitat for Osmoderma barnabita (Motsch.) (Coleoptera, Cetoniinae). J Insect Conserv 18:855–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hodkinson ID (2005) Terrestrial insects along elevational gradients: species and community responses to altitude. Biol Rev 80:489–513CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Horak J (2011) Response of saproxylic beetles to tree species composition in a secondary urban forest area. Urb For Urb Green 10:213–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Horak J (2017) Insect ecology and veteran trees. J Insect Conserv 21:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Iwona M, Marek P, Katarzyna W, Edwards B, Julia S (2017) Use of a genetically informed population viability analysis to evaluate management options for Polish populations of endangered beetle Cerambyx cerdo L. (1758) (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). J Insect Conserv 22:69. Scholar
  44. Jamieson MA, Schwartzberg EG, Raffa KF, Reich PB, Lindroth RL (2015) Experimental climate warming alters aspen and birch phytochemistry and performance traits for an outbreak insect herbivore. Glob Change Biol 21:2698–2710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jansson N, Ranius T, Larsson A, Milberg P (2009) Boxes mimicking tree hollows can help conservation of saproxylic beetles. Biodivers Conserv 18:3891–3908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jongman RHG, Pungetti G (2004) Ecological networks and greenways; concept, design, implementation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jonsell M (2012) Old park trees as habitat for saproxylic beetle species. Biodivers Conserv 21:619–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jonsson N, Mendez M, Ranius T (2004) Nutrient richness of wood mould in tree hollows with the scarabaeid beetle Osmoderma eremita. Anim Biodiv Conserv 27:79–82Google Scholar
  49. Jung J-K, Lee SK, Lee S-I, Lee J-H (2018) Trait-specific response of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) to forest fragmentation in the temperate region in Korea. Biodivers Conserv 27:53–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Khazan ES (2014) Tests for biological corridor efficacy for conservation of a Neotropical giant damselfly. Biol Conserv 177:117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kiffney PM, Richardson JS, Bull JP (2003) Responses of periphyton and insects to experimental manipulation of riparian buffer width along forest streams. J Appl Ecol 40:1060–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kitching RL, Ashton LA (2014) Predictor sets and biodiversity assessments: the evolution and application of an idea. Pac Conserv Biol 19:418–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lane J (1993) Overwintering monarch butterlies in California: past and present. In: Malcolm SB, Zalucki MP (eds) Biology and conservation of the monarch butterfly. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, pp 335–344Google Scholar
  54. Langor DW, Hammond HEJ, Spence JR, Jacobs J, Cobb TP (2008) Saproxylic insect assemblages in Canadian forests: diversity, ecology, and conservation. Canad Entomol 140:453–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Larsen TB (2005) The butterflies of West Africa. Apollo Books, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  56. Lee S-I, Spence JR, Langor DW (2017) Combinations of aggregated and dispersed retention improve conservation of saproxylic beetles in boreal white spruce stands. For Ecol Manag 385:116–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lindenmayer DB (2017) Conserving large old trees as small natural features. Biol Conserv 211:51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lindenmayer DB, Laurance WF (2017) The ecology, distribution, conservation and management of large old trees. Biol Rev 92:1434–1458CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Lindenmayer DB, Claridge AW, Gilmore AM, Michael D, Lindenmayer BR (2002) The ecological roles of logs in Australian forests and the potential impacts of harvesting intensification on log-using biota. Pac Conserv Biol 8:121–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lindenmayer DB, Banks SC, Laurence WF, Franklin JF, Likens GE (2014) Broad decline of populations of large old trees. Conserv Lett 7:72–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lindenmayer DB, Blair D, McBurney L, Banks SC (2015) The need for a comprehensive reassessment of the Regional Forest Agreements in Australia. Pac Conserv Biol 21:266–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Manzo-Delgado L, Lopez-Garcia J, Alcantara-Ayala I (2014) Role of forest conservation in lessening land degradation in a temperate region: the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve, Mexico. J Environ Manag 138: 55–66Google Scholar
  63. Marczak LB, Sakamaki T, Turvey SL, Deguise I, Wood SLR, Richardson JS (2010) Are forested buffers an effective conservation strategy for riparian fauna? An assessment using meta-analysis. Ecol Appl 20:126–134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Margules CR (1992) The Wog Wog habitat fragmentation experiment. Environ Conserv 19:316–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Martikainen P (2001) Conservation of threatened saproxylic beetles: significance of retained aspen Populus tremula on clearcut areas. Ecol Bull 49:205–218Google Scholar
  66. Martikainen P, Kouki J, Heikalla O (2006) Effects of green tree retention and subsequent prescribed burning on the crown damage caused by the pine shoot beetles (Tomicus spp.) in pine-dominated timber harvest areas. Ecography 29:659–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Matveinen-Huju K, Niemela J, Rita H, O’Hara RB (2006) Retention-tree groups in clear-cuts: do they constitute ‘life-boats’ for spiders and carabids? For Ecol Manag 230:119–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. McElhinny C, Gibbons P, Brack C, Bauhus J (2008) Fauna-habitat relationships: a basis for identifying key stand structural attributes in temperate Australian eucalypt forests and woodlands. Pac Conserv Biol 12:89–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mico E, Garcia-Lopez A, Sanchez A, Juarez M, Galante E (2015) What can physical, biotic and chemical features of a tree hollow tell us about their associated diversity? J Insect Conserv 19:141–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Minshall GW (2003) Responses of stream benthic macroinvertebrates to fire. For Ecol Manag 178:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Monkkonen M, Mutanen M (2003) Occurrence of moths in boreal forest corridors. Conserv Biol 17:468–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Moraal LG, Jayers op Akkerhuis GAJM (2011) Changing patterns in insect pests on trees in the Netherlands since 1946 in relation to human induced habitat changes and climate factors – an analysis of historical data. For Ecol Manag 261:50–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Mori AS, Kitagawa R (2014) Retention forestry as a major paradigm for safeguarding forest biodiversity in productive landscapes: a global meta-analysis. Biol Conserv 175:65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. New TR (2014) Insects, fire and conservation. Springer, ChamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Niemela J, Kotze J, Ashworth A, Brandmayr P, Desender K et al (2000) The search for common anthropogenic impacts on biodiversity, a global network J Insect Conserv 4:3–9Google Scholar
  76. Nieto A, Alexander KNA (2010a) European red list of Saproxylic beetles. Publications office of the European union, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  77. Nieto A, Alexander KNA (2010b) The status and conservation of saproxylic beetles in Europe. Cuademos de Biodiversidad (2010):3–10Google Scholar
  78. Quinto J, Marcos-Garcia MA, Diaz-Castelazo C, Rico-Gray V, Bustel H et al. (2012) Breaking down complex saproxylic communities: understanding sub-networks structure and implications to network robustness. PLoS ONE 7: e45062Google Scholar
  79. Ranius T, Jansson N (2000) The influence of forest regrowth, original canopy cover and tree size on saproxylic beetles associated with old oaks. Biol Conserv 95:85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ray R, Chandran MDS, Ramachandra TV (2014) Biodiversity and ecological assessments of Indian sacred groves. J For Res 25:21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Reeves GH, Bisson PA, Rieman BE, Benda LE (2006) Postfire logging in riparian areas. Conserv Biol 20:994–1004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Roland J (1993) Large-scale forest fragmentation increases the duration of tent caterpillar outbreak. Oecologia 93:25–30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Rosenvald R, Lohmus A (2008) For what, when, and where is green-tree retention better than clear-cutting? A review of the biodiversity aspects. For Ecol Manag 255:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Roy S, Davison A, Ostberg J (2017) Pragmatic factors outweigh ecosystem service goals in street tree selection and planting in south-East Queensland cities. Urb For Urb Green 21:166–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sahlin E, Schroeder LM (2010) Importance of habitat patch size for occupancy and density of aspen-associated saproxylic beetles. Biodivers Conserv 19:1325–1339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Saint-Germain M, Drapeau P, Hebert C (2004) Comparison of Coleoptera assemblages from a recently burned and unburned black spruce forest of northeastern North America. Biol Conserv 118:583–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Samways MJ (2007) Implementing ecological networks for conserving insects and other biodiversity. pp. 127–143 in Stewart AJA, New TR, Lewis OT (eds) Insect conservation biology. CAB International, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  88. Schauer B, Steinbauer MJ, Vailshery LS, Muller J, Feldhaar H, Obermaier E (2017) Influences of tree hollow characteristics on saproxylic beetle diversity in a managed forest. Biodivers Conserv 27:1–17Google Scholar
  89. Schmitt CB, Burgess ND, Coad L, Belokurov A, Besancon C et al (2009) Global analysis of the protection status of the world’s forests. Biol Conserv 142:2122–2130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Schmuki C, Vorburger C, Runciman D, Maceachern S, Sunnucks P (2006) When log-dwellers meet loggers: impacts of forest fragmentation on two endemic log-dwelling beetles in southeastern Australia. Molec Ecol 15:1481–1492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Schwartzberg EG, Jamieson MA, Raffa KF, Reich PB, Montgomery RA, Lindroth RL (2014) Simulated climate warming alters phenological synchrony between an outbreak insect herbivore and host trees. Oecologia 175:1041–1049CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Sebek P, Vodka A, Bogusch P, Pech P, Tropek R, Weiss M, Zimova K, Cizek L (2016) Open-grown trees as key habitats for arthropods in temperate woodlands: the diversity, composition, and conservation value of associated communities. For Ecol Manag 380:172–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Shafer CL (2015) Cautionary thoughts on IUCN protected area management categories V-VI. Glob Ecol Conserv 3:331–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Shahabuddin G, Herzner GA, Aponter C, Gomez M del C (2000) Persistence of a frugivorous butterfly species in Venezuelan forest fragments: the role of movement and habitat quality. Biodivers Conserv 9:1623–1641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Smith SE, Mendoza MG, Zuniga G, Halbrook K, Hayes JL, Byrne DN (2013) Predicting the distribution of a novel bark beetle and its pine hosts under future climate conditions. Agric For Entomol 15:212–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Sodhi NS, Wilcove DS, Subaraj R, Yong DL, Lee TM, Bernard H, Lim SLH (2010) Insect extinctions on a small denuded Bornean island. Biodivers Conserv 9:485–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Speight MCD (1989) Saproxylic insects and their conservation. Nature and Environment Series no. 42, Council of Europe, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  98. Spence JR, Langor D, Niemela J, Carcamo H, Currie C (1996) Northern forestry and carabids: the case for concern about old-growth species. Ann Zool Fenn 33:173–184Google Scholar
  99. Spencer R-J, Baxter GS (2006) Effects of fire on the structure and composition of open eucalypt forests. Aust Ecol 31:638–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Sugiura S, Yamaura Y, Tsuru T, Goto H, Hasegawa M, Makihara H, Makino S (2009) Beetle responses to artificial gaps in an oceanic island forest: implications for invasive tree management to conserve endemic species diversity. Biodivers Conserv 18:2101–2118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Sverdrup-Thygeson A, Ims RA (2002) The effect of forest clearcutting in Norway on the community of saproxylic beetles on aspen. Biol Conserv 106:347–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Sverdrup-Thygeson A, Skarpaas O, Odegaard F (2010) Hollow oaks and beetle conservation: the significance of the surroundings. Biodivers Conserv 19:837–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Sverdrup-Thygeson A, Skarpas O, Blumentrath S, Birkemoe T, Evju M (2017) Habitat connectivity affects specialist species richness more than generalists in veteran trees. For Ecol Manag 403:96–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Terborgh J (2004) Reflections of a scientist on the world parks congress. Conserv Biol 18:619–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Tomlinson I, Potter C, Bayliss H (2015) Managing tree pests and diseases in urban settings: the case of Oak processionary moth in London, 2006-2012. Urb For Urb Green 14:286–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Vanha-Majamaa I, Jalonen J (2001) Green tree retention in Fennoscandian forestry. Scand J For Res 16(S3):79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Varkonyi G, Kuussaari M, Lappalainen H (2003) Use of forest corridors by boreal Xestia moths. Oecologia 137:466–474CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. York A (2000) Long-term effects of frequent low-intensity burning on ant communities in coastal blackbutt forests of southeastern Australia. Aust Ecol 25:83–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tim R. New
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecology, Environment & EvolutionLa Trobe UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations