Advertisement

How Software Matters: Connective Tissue and Self-Driving Cars

Chapter
  • 472 Downloads

Abstract

Drawing on the example of self-driving and connected cars, this chapter explores how the software that is being integrated into, and transforming, everyday objects might be conceptualised within theories of practice. It argues that although software is an especially dynamic and intangible ‘material’ it can still be accommodated within existing conceptualisations of materiality in practice theories. The automation that software enables can be positioned as part of practice complexes, even when it does not play a direct, constitutive role in any single practice. In addition, through performing varied work in connecting practices and enabling ‘feedback’ over time and space, software can be understood to form part of the connective tissue by which practice complexes hang together and change.

Keywords

Self-driving Cars Single Practice Practice Theory Autopilot Software Schatzki 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barad, Karen. 2003. Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (3): 801–831.  https://doi.org/10.1086/345321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beer, David. 2017. The Social Power of Algorithms. Information, Communication & Society 20 (1): 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1216147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berry, David. 2008. A Contribution Towards A Grammar of Code. Fibreculture Journal 1 (13): 1–1.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 2011. The Philosophy of Software: Code and Mediation in the Digital Age. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blue, Stanley. 2017. Institutional Rhythms: Combining Practice Theory and Rhythmanalysis to Conceptualise Processes of Institutionalisation. Time & Society.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X17702165.
  6. Blue, Stanley, and Nicola Spurling. 2017. Qualities of Connective Tissue in Hospital Life: How Complexes of Practice Change. In The Nexus of Practices: Connections, Constellations, Practitioners, ed. Allison Hui, Theodore Schatzki, and Elizabeth Shove, 24–37. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Dant, Tim. 2004. The Driver-car. Theory, Culture & Society 21 (4–5): 61–79.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276404046061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Decker, Kris. 2017. Rebooting Energy Demand: Understanding Software Updates. Accessed August 17, 2017. http://www.demand.ac.uk/rebooting-energy-demand-automatic-software-updates/.
  9. Dodge, Martin, and Rob Kitchin. 2009. Software, Objects, and Home Space. Environment and Planning A 41 (6): 1344–1365.  https://doi.org/10.1068/a4138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. European Commission. 2015. eCall in All New Cars from April 2018. Accessed September 9, 2017. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/news/ecall-all-new-cars-april-2018.
  11. Fehrenbacher, Katie. 2015. How Tesla is Ushering in the Age of the Learning Car. Fortune. Last modified 16 October 2015. Accessed September 4, 2017. http://fortune.com/2015/10/16/how-tesla-autopilot-learns/.
  12. Gillespie, Tarleton, Pablo Boczkowski, and Kirsten Foot. 2014. The Relevance of Algorithms. In Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gitlin, Johnathan M. 2016. Audi Wants Its Connected Cars to Improve the Breed. Accessed August 9, 2017. https://arstechnica.co.uk/cars/2016/09/personal-assistants-and-data-analytics-the-future-of-audis-car-ux/.
  14. Ingold, Tim. 2007. Materials Against Materiality. Archaeological Dialogues 14 (1): 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203807002127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ———. 2010. Bringing Things Back to Life: Creative Entanglements in a World of Materials. NCRM Working Paper. Realities/Morgan Centre, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  16. Kitchin, Rob, and Martin Dodge. 2011. Code/Space: Software and Everyday Life. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kitchin, Rob, and Sung-Yueh Perng. 2016. Code and the City. Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Knorr Cetina, Karin. 2005. Complex Global Microstructures The New Terrorist Societies. Theory, Culture & Society 22 (5): 213–234.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276405057200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leonardi, Paul M. 2010. Digital Materiality? How Artifacts Without Matter, Matter. First Monday.  https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v15i6.3036.
  20. Lin, Patrick. 2016. Why Ethics Matters for Autonomous Cars. In Autonomous Driving, ed. M. Maurer, J. Gerdes, B. Lenz, and H. Winner. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Mackenzie, Adrian. 2006. Cutting Code: Software and Sociality. Vol. 30. Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  22. Macrorie, Rachel, Mette Kragh-Furbo, and Janine Morley. 2016. Daily Life, Digital Technologies and Energy Demand. Working Paper Collection.Google Scholar
  23. McDonald, Rob. 2016. Why Driverless Cars May Make Cities Sprawl Even More. Accessed September 4, 2017. https://blog.nature.org/science/2016/04/20/why-driverless-cars-cities-sprawl-urban-suburban-development/.
  24. McHugh, Molly. 2015. Tesla’s Cars Now Drive Themselves, Kinda. Wired. Accessed April 20, 2017. https://www.wired.com/2015/10/tesla-self-driving-over-air-update-live/.
  25. Morley, Janine. 2017. Technologies Within and Beyond Practices. In The Nexus of Practices: Connections, Constellations, Practitioners, ed. Allison Hui, Theodore Schatzki, and Elizabeth Shove, 81–97. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Pasquale, Frank. 2015. The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms that Control Money and Information. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Pollock, Neil, and Robin Williams. 2008. Software and Organisations: The Biography of the Enterprise-Wide System or How SAP Conquered the World. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Reckwitz, Andreas. 2002. The Status of the ‘Material’ in Theories of Culture: From ‘Social Structure’ to ‘Artefacts. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour: 195–217.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schatzki, Theodore R. 2002. The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  30. ———. 2010. Materiality and Social Life. Nature and Culture 5: 123–149.  https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2010.050202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. ———. 2011. Where the Action is (On Large Social Phenomena Such as Sociotechnical Regimes). Working Paper 1, Sustainable Practices Research Group.Google Scholar
  32. ———. 2012. A Primer on Practices. In Practice-Based Education: Perspectives and Strategies, ed. Joy Higgs, Ronald Barnett, Stephen Billett, Maggie Hutchings, and Franziska Trede. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Shove, Elizabeth. 2017. Matters of Practice. In The Nexus of Practices: Connections, Constellations, Practitioners, ed. Allison Hui, Theodore Schatzki, and Elizabeth Shove, 155–168. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Shove, Elizabeth, Mika Pantzar, and Matt Watson. 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How It Changes. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shove, E., G. Walker, and S. Brown. 2014. Material Culture, Room Temperature and the Social Organisation of Thermal Energy. Journal of Material Culture 19 (2): 113–124.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183514525084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shove, Elizabeth, Matt Watson, and Nicola Spurling. 2015. Conceptualizing Connections: Energy demand, Infrastructures and Social Practices. European Journal of Social Theory 18 (3): 274–287.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431015579964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stilgoe, Jack. 2017. Machine Learning, Social Learning and the Governance of Self-Driving Cars. SSRN Research Paper.Google Scholar
  38. Thielman, Sam. 2017. The Customer is Always Wrong: Tesla Lets Out Self-Driving Car Data—When It Suits. Accessed September 4, 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/apr/03/the-customer-is-always-wrong-tesla-lets-out-self-driving-car-data-when-it-suits.
  39. Thrift, Nigel. 2004. Electric Animals: New Models of Everyday Life? Cultural Studies 18 (2–3): 461–482.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0950238042000201617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thrift, Nigel, and Shaun French. 2002. The Automatic Production of Space. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 27 (3): 309–335.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5661.00057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Urry, John. 2004. The ‘System’ of Automobility. Theory, Culture & Society 21 (4–5): 25–39.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276404046059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wallace, Nick. 2017. EU’s eCall Regulation Sacrifices Safety for Privacy. Accessed August 9, 2017. https://www.euractiv.com/section/digital/opinion/eus-ecall-regulation-sacrifices-safety-for-privacy/.
  43. Wallenborn, Grégoire. 2013. Extended Bodies and the Geometry of Practices. In Sustainable Practices: Social Theory and Climate Change, ed. Elizabeth Shove and Nicola Spurling, 146–164. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Watson, Matt. 2012. How Theories of Practice can Inform Transition to a Decarbonised Transport System. Journal of Transport Geography 24: 488–496.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zarsky, Tal. 2015. The Trouble with Algorithmic Decisions: An Analytic Road Map to Examine Efficiency and Fairness in Automated and Opaque Decision Making. Science, Technology & Human Values 41 (1): 118–132.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915605575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyDEMAND Centre (Dynamics of Energy, Mobility and Demand), Lancaster UniversityLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations