Advertisement

Participatory Health Research International Experience from Four Portuguese-Speaking Countries

  • Irma Brito
  • Donizete Daher
  • Crystiane Ribas
  • Fernanda Príncipe
  • Fernando Mendes
  • Filipa Homem
  • Hayda Alves
  • Lina Berardinelli
  • Maria do Céu Barbieri-Figueiredo
  • Maria da Conceição Martins Silva
  • Maria Elisabete da Costa Martins
  • Nathalia Miranda
  • Sonia Acioli
  • Vanessa Correa
  • Vera Saboia
  • Verónica Pinheiro
Chapter

Abstract

Thinking about participatory health research (PHR) in Portuguese-speaking countries implies diversity and specifically cultural diversity. Four years after the chapter’s co-authors were integrated into the International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research (ICPHR) network, they decided to reflect on how PHR is emerging in Portuguese-speaking countries. Participatory research builds on co-created knowledge by doing research with people not on them, so it becomes challenging to reflect on the singularities of PHR among Portuguese-speaking projects due to cultural diversity. This chapter presents the reflexive synthesis of nine PHR projects developed in Angola, Brazil, Cape Verde, and Portugal using comparative analysis. PHR coordinators were invited to co-author this chapter with the purpose of synthesizing and comparing (i) research design and validity, (ii) participation, and (iii) impact of research and dissemination. The projects were focused on topics such as “partygoer” college and university students, young people living in violent communities, people living with chronic diseases, women without access to cervical cancer screening, and primary health-care practices. These projects revealed PHR “good practices” and the potential to support social change through person-/community-centered services and greater responsiveness/inclusion in the health-care system. The barrier between scientific and lay knowledge must be overcome so that proposals can emphasize the impact of powerlessness in people’s daily lives.

Keywords

Participatory health research Angola Brazil Cape Verde Portugal Portuguese-speaking countries, International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research (ICPHR) 

References

  1. Acioli, S. (2006). Sentidos e práticas de saúde em grupos populares e a enfermagem em saúde pública. Revista Enfermagem UERJ, 14, 21–26 Available via http://www.facenf.uerj.br/v14n1/v14n1a03.pdf. Accessed 06 Jan 2017.Google Scholar
  2. Alves, H., et al. (2017). Adolescent pregnancy and local co-planning: A diagnostic approach based on the PRECEDE-PROCEED model. Revista de Enfermagem Referência, IV, (12), 35–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.12707/RIV16058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bardin, L. (2006). Análise de conteúdo. Edições 70. Lisboa.Google Scholar
  4. Brito, I. (2009). PEER – peer education engagement and evaluation research. In Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra. ESEnfC, Coimbra. Available via ESEnfC/UICISA-E http://web.esenfc.pt/public/index.php?module=ui&target=outreach-projects&id_projecto=54&id_linha_investigacao=1&tipo=UI. Accessed 03 Jan 2017.
  5. Brito, I. (2014). Um modelo de planeamento da promoção da saúde: Modelo PRECEDE-PROCEED. In R. R. Pedroso, I. Brito (Eds.), Saúde dos estudantes do ensino superior de enfermagem: Estudo de contexto na Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra: Unidade de Investigação em Ciências da Saúde: Enfermagem (pp. 33–83). Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra.Google Scholar
  6. Brito, I., & Mendes, F. (2015). Curso Internacional de Pesquisa-ação Participativa em Saúde em português (CIPaPS). Coimbra: Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra, ESEnfC, Coimbra Available via ESEnfC/UICISA-E. http://www.esenfc.pt/event/3cipapes. Accessed 06 Jan 2017.
  7. Cook, T., et al. (2017). Accessing participatory research impact and legacy: Developing the evidence base for participatory approaches in health research. Educational Action Research, 25(4), 473–488.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2017.1326964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science and Medicine, 41, 1667–1676.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. CPLP. (2017). Comunidade dos Países de Língua Portuguesa. Available via https://www.cplp.org/. Accessed 06 Jan 2017.
  10. Cruzes, D., et al. (2015). Case studies synthesis: A thematic, cross-case, and narrative synthesis worked example. Empirical Software Engineering, 20(6), 1634–1665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fals-Borda, O., & Rahman, M. (1991). Action and knowledge: Breaking the monopoly with participatory action research. Michigan: Apex Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. ICPHR. (2009). International collaboration on participatory health research. Available via www.icphr.org. Accessed 06 Jan 2017.
  13. ICPHR. (2013a). What is participatory health research? Position paper 1. Available via International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research: http://www.icphr.org/position-papers/position-paper-no-1. Accessed 06 Jan 2017.
  14. ICPHR. (2013b). Participatory health research: A guide to ethical principals and practice. Position paper 2. Available via International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research: http://www.icphr.org/uploads/2/0/3/9/20399575/ichpr_position_paper_2_ethics_-_version_october_2013.pdf. Accessed 06 Jan 2017.
  15. Ledwith, M., & Springett, J. (2010). Participatory practice, community based action for transformative change. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01609513.2010.490897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Loewenson, et al. (2014). Investigación-acción participativa en sistemas de salud: una guía de métodos. Harare: TARSC, AHPSR, WHO, IDRC Canada, EQUINET.Google Scholar
  17. Martins, E., & Brito, I. (2013). Investigação-acção participativa em saúde: revisão integrativa da literatura em língua portuguesa. Coimbra: ESEnfC. Retrieved from http://repositorio.esenfc.pt/private/index.php?process=download&id=27076&code=480
  18. Miranda, N., et al. (2016). Práxis interdisciplinar de cuidado em grupo de pessoas que vivem com fibromialgia. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, [en linea], 69(6), 1115–1123 Available via Redalyc http://www.redalyc.org/html/2670/267048565015/ Accessed 06 Jan 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Oliveira, G. M. (2013). Política linguística e internacionalização: a língua portuguesa no mundo globalizado do século XXI. Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada, 52(2), 409–433.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-18132013000200010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Passos, E., Kastrup, V., & Escóssia, L. (2010). Pistas do método da cartografia: pesquisa intervenção e produção de subjetividade (1st ed.). Porto Alegre: Editora Sulina.Google Scholar
  21. Popay, J., et al. (2010). Developing methods for the narrative synthesis of quantitative and qualitative data in systematic reviews of effects. Available via Centre for Review and Dissemination http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/projects/narrative_synthesis.htm. Accessed in 06 Jan 2018.
  22. Shannon, A., et al. (2016). Peer health educators can promote worksite and community health. SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Health, Safety, Security, Environment, and Social Responsibility. Available via Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-179496-MS. Accessed 06 Jan 2017.
  23. Silva, M., et al. (2016). Prevenção do cancro do colo do útero: capacitação de mulheres de uma comunidade de Luanda (pp. 2183–4008). Omnia, Lisboa. Available via http://omnia.grei.pt/n05201610240915/[0507].pdf. Accessed 06 Jan 2017.
  24. Smith, S., Nutbeam, D., & McCaffery, K. (2013). Insights into the concept and measurement of health literacy from a study of shared decision-making in a low literacy population. Journal of Health Psychology, 8, 1011–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Souza-Santos, B. (2007). Para além do pensamento abissal: das linhas globais a uma ecologia de saberes. Novos Estudos CEBRAP, 79, 71–94 Available via http://www.scielo.br/pdf/nec/n79/04.pdf Accessed 06 Jan 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. WHO. (2015). European compendium of good practices in nursing and midwifery towards health 2020 goals. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irma Brito
    • 1
  • Donizete Daher
    • 2
  • Crystiane Ribas
    • 2
  • Fernanda Príncipe
    • 3
  • Fernando Mendes
    • 4
  • Filipa Homem
    • 1
  • Hayda Alves
    • 5
  • Lina Berardinelli
    • 6
  • Maria do Céu Barbieri-Figueiredo
    • 7
  • Maria da Conceição Martins Silva
    • 8
  • Maria Elisabete da Costa Martins
    • 1
  • Nathalia Miranda
    • 6
  • Sonia Acioli
    • 6
  • Vanessa Correa
    • 9
  • Vera Saboia
    • 2
  • Verónica Pinheiro
    • 6
  1. 1.Nursing School of Coimbra & UICISA:eCoimbraPortugal
  2. 2.Aurora de Afonso Costa Nursing SchoolFluminense Federal UniversityNiteróiBrazil
  3. 3.Red Cross Portuguese Health School of Oliveira AzeméisOliveira de AzeméisPortugal
  4. 4.IREFREACoimbraPortugal
  5. 5.Rio das Ostras FacultyFluminense Federal UniversityNiteróiBrazil
  6. 6.Nursing FacultyRio de Janeiro State UniversityRio de JaneiroBrazil
  7. 7.Nursing School of Porto & CINTESIS-UPPortoPortugal
  8. 8.Institute of Health SciencesUniversity of AngolaLuandaAngola
  9. 9.UNIRIO-Rio de Janeiro State UniversityRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations