Advertisement

Dye Removal Using Microbial Biosorbents

  • Uttariya Roy
  • Suvendu Manna
  • Shubhalakshmi Sengupta
  • Papita Das
  • Siddhartha Datta
  • Aniruddha Mukhopadhyay
  • Avijit Bhowal
Chapter
Part of the Environmental Chemistry for a Sustainable World book series (ECSW, volume 19)

Abstract

Due to the rapid urbanization and industrialization, huge amounts of toxic sludge are being disposed into the environment. Improper management of this toxic sludge contaminates all components of the environment. Dyes are being used from very ancient period of time as colouring substances for almost every commodity. Some dyes are toxic to living organisms. Dyes may initiate cancer, mutation in the genetic sequences and suppress enzyme activities.

The review presents physical and chemical dye decolourizing methods. Complete removal of dyes pollution is not easy owing to the diversity and complex molecular structure of the dyes coupled with the associated toxicological aspects. The review also discuss the use of microbial species for dye removal. Many microbes of different taxonomic group of bacteria, fungi, and algae have been reported to enzymatically degrade dye molecules. In addition, these types of biomasses have very high dye sorption capacity. Thus complete dye removal from the polluted water can be done by combining the bio-adsorption and bio-degradation processes.

Keywords

Biosorption Dyes Biomass Modeling Microbe Toxicity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

UR, PD, and AB would like to thank WBDBT for the financial support. SM would like to thank Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), New Delhi, India for the financial support he is receiving as a National Postdoctoral Fellow (File number PDF/2016/000062). SS would like to thank UGC D. S. Kothari Postdoctoral Fellowship Scheme, New Delhi, India for the financial support she is receiving as a UGC DSK Postdoctoral Fellow (Appl. No. CH/15-16/0163).

References

  1. Acuner E, Dilek FB (2004) Treatment of tectilon yellow 2G by Chlorella vulgaris. Process Biochem 39:623–631.  https://doi.org/10.12691/jaem-1-1-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahalya N, Ramachandra TV, Kanamadi RD (2003) Biosorption of heavy metals. Res J Chem Environ 7(4):71–79Google Scholar
  3. Aksu Z, Donmez G (2005) Combined effects of molasses sucrose and reactive dye on the growth and dye bioaccumulation properties of Candida tropicalis. Process Biochem 40:2443–2454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aksu Z, Karabayir G (2008) Comparison of biosorption properties of different kinds of fungi for the removal of Gryfalan Black RL metal-complex dye. Bioresour Technol 99:7730–7741.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.01.056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anouzla A, Abrouki Y, Souabi S, Safi M, Rhbal H (2009) Color and COD removal of disperse dye solution by a novel coagulant: application of statistical design for the optimization and regression analysis. J Hazard Mater 166:1302–1306.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.12.039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Azmi W, Sani RK, Banerjee UC (1998) Biodegradation of triphenylmethane dyes. Enzym Microb Technol 22:185–191.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2014.07.063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Banerjee P, Barman SR, Mukhopadhayay A, Das P (2017) Ultrasound assisted mixed azo dye adsorption by chitosan–graphene oxide nanocomposite. Chem Eng Res Des 117:43–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beltran-Heredia J, Sanchez-Martin J, Rodriguez-Sanchez MT (2011) Textile wastewater purification through natural coagulants. Appl Water Sci 1:25–33.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-013-0092-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bharathiraja B, Chakravarthy M, Kumar RR, Yogendran D, Yuvaraj D, Jayamuthunagai J (2015) Aquatic biomass (algae) as a future feed stock for bio-refineries: a review on cultivation, processing and products. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 47:634–653.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burgeron JCR, Stevens GA, Sugimoto JD, Roos FF, Ezzati M, Black RE, Kraemer K (2015) Global update and trends of hidden hunger, 1995–2011: the hidden hunger index. PLoS One 10(12).  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143497
  11. Chowdhury S, Saha P (2011) Adsorption thermodynamics and kinetics of malachite green onto Ca(OH)2 – treated fly ash. J Environ Eng 137:388–397.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chowdhury S, Mishra R, Kushwaha P, Saha P (2012) Removal of safranin from aqueous solutions by NaOH-treated rice husk: thermodynamics, kinetics and isosteric heat of adsorption. Asia Pac J Chem Eng 7:236–249.  https://doi.org/10.1002/apj.525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crini G (2006) Non-conventional low-adsorbents for dye removal. Bioresour Technol 97:1061–1085.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.05.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crini G, Badot PM (2008) Application of chitosan, a natural aminopolysaccharide, for dye removal from aqueous solutions by adsorption processes using batch studies: a review of recent literature. Prog Polym Sci 33(4):399–447.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.11.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Demirbas A (2010) Use of algae as biofuel sources. Energy Convers Manag 51:2738–2749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Doi H, Katano I, Negishi JN, Sanada S, Kayaba Y (2013) Effects of biodiversity, habitat structure, and water quality on recreational use of rivers. Ecosphere 4:102.  https://doi.org/10.1890/ES12-00305.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dotto GL, Vieira MLG, Esquerdo VM, Pinto LAA (2013) Equilibrium and thermodynamics of azo dyes biosorption onto Spirulina platensis. Braz J Chem Eng 30:13–21.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-66322013000100003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. El-Desoky HS, Ghoneim MM, Zidan NM (2010) Decolourization and degradation of Ponceau S azo-dye in aqueous solutions by the electrochemical advanced Fenton oxidation. Desalination 264:143–150.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.07.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. El Jamal MM, Ncibi MC (2012) Biosorption of methylene blue by Chaetophoraelegans algae: kinetics, equilibriumand thermodynamic studies. Acta Chim Slov 59:24–31Google Scholar
  20. El-Gohary F, Tawfik A (2009) Decolorization and COD reduction of disperse and reactive dyes wastewater using chemical-coagulation followed by sequential batch reactor (SBR) process. Desalination 249:1159–1164.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2009.05.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. El-Kassas HY, Mohamed LA (2014) Bioremediation of the textile waste effluent by Chlorella vulgaris. Egypt J Aquat Res 40:301–308.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.04.092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fu Y, Viraraghavan T (2002) Removal of Congo Red from an aqueous solution by fungus Aspergillus niger. Adv Environ Res 7:239–247.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1735-2746-10-12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gazsó LG (2001) The key microbial processes in the removal of toxic metals and radionuclides from the environment. Cent Eur J Occup Environ Med 7:178–185Google Scholar
  24. Ghoneim MM, El-Desoky HS, Zidan NM (2011) Electro-Fenton oxidation of Sunset Yellow FCF azo-dye in aqueous solution. Desalination 274:22–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2012.07.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gregory DH, Gerig JT (1991) Prediction of fluorine chemical shifts in proteins. Biopolymers 31:845–858.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.360310705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Greluk M, Hubicki Z (2011) Efficient removal of Acid Orange 7 dye from water using the strongly basic anion exchange resin Amberlite IRA-958. Desalination 278:219–226.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1005157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guimaraes JR, Maniero MG, Araujo RN (2012) A comparative study on the degradation of RB-19 dye in an aqueous medium by advanced oxidation process. J Environ Manag 110:33–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.05.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gupta VK, Suhas (2009) Application of low-cost adsorbents for dye removal. J Environ Manag 90:2313–2342.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.11.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gürses A, Karaca S, Doğar Ç, Bayrak R, Açıkyıldız M, Yalçın M (2004) Determination of adsorptive properties of clay/water system: methylene blue sorption. J Colloid Interface Sci 269:310–314.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2003.09.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hameed BH, Din ATM, Ahmad AL (2006) Adsorption of methylene blue onto bamboo-based activated carbon: kinetics and equilibrium studies. J Hazard Mater 141:819–825.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.07.049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaur R, Wani SP, Singh AK, Lal K (2012) Wastewater production, treatment and use in India. National report presented at the 2nd regional workshop on safe use of wastewater in agriculture, May 16–18, 2012, New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  32. Kaushik P, Malik A (2009) Fungal dye decolourization: recent advances and future potential. Environ Int 35:127–141.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2008.05.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Khalaf MA (2008) Biosorption of reactive dye from textile waste water by nonviable biomass of Aspergillus niger and Spirogyra sp. Bioresour Technol 99:6631–6634.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.12.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Khayet M, Zahrimb AY, Hilal N (2011) Modelling and optimization of coagulation of highly concentrated industrial grade leather dye by response surface methodology. Chem Eng J 167:77–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.11.108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kondru AK, Kumar P, Chand S (2009) Catalytic wet peroxide oxidation of azo dye (Congo red) using modified Y zeolite as catalyst. J Hazard Mater 166:342–347.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.11.042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Liang J, Xia J, Long J (2017) Biosorption of methylene blue by nonliving biomass of the brown macroalga Sargassum hemiphyllum. Water Sci Technol:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2017.343
  37. Maiti A (2010) Removal of arsenic from water using raw and treated laterite as adsorbent, Ph.D. thesis, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  38. Manna S, Roy D, Saha P, Gopakumar D, Thomas S (2017) Rapid methylene blue adsorption using modified lignocellulosic materials. Process Saf Environ Prot 107:346–356.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.03.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Martinez-Huitel CA, Brillas E (2009) Decontamination of wastewaters containing synthetic organic dyes by electrochemical methods: a general review. Appl Catal B Environ 87:105–145.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.09.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Marungrueng K, Pavasant P (2006) Removal of basic dye (Astrazon Blue FGRL) using macroalga Caulerpa lentillifera. J Environ Manag 78:268–274.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.04.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mata TM, Martins AA, Caetano NS (2010) Microalgae for biodiesel production and other applications. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14:217–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mata TM, Martins AA, Sikdar S, Costa CAV (2011) Sustainability considerations of biodiesel based on supply chain analysis. Clean Techn Environ Policy 13:655–671.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-010-0346-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Maurya NS, Mittal AK, Cornel P, Rother E (2006) Biosorption of dyes using dead macro fungi: effect of dye structure, ionic strength and pH. Bioresour Technol 97:512–521.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.02.045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Maurya R, Ghosh T, Paliwal C, Shrivastav A, Chokshi K, Pancha I, Ghosh A, Mishra S (2014) Biosorption of methylene blue by de-oiled algal biomass: equilibrium, kinetics and artificial neural network modelling. PLoS One 9:e109545.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Moghaddam SS, Moghaddam MRA, Arami M (2010) Coagulation/flocculation process for dye removal using sludge from water treatment plant: optimization through response surface methodology. J Hazard Mater 175:651–657.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moghaddam SS, Moghaddam MRA, Arami M (2011) Response surface optimization of acid red 119 dye from simulated wastewater using Al based waterworks sludge and polyaluminium chloride as coagulant. J Environ Manag 92:1284–1291.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.12.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mohan SV, Ramanaiah SV, Sarma PN (2008) Biosorption of direct azo dye from aqueous phaseonto Spirogyra sp. I02: evaluation of kineticsand mechanistic aspects. Biochem Eng J 38:61–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2007.06.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mou DG, Lim KK, Shen HP (1991) Microbial agents for decolourization of dye wastewaters. Biotechnol Adv 9:613–622.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-9750(91)90734-DCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Oladoja NA, Akinlabi AK (2009) Congo red biosorption on palm kernel seed coat. Ind Eng Chem Res 48:6188–6196.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie801003vCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Olguı’n EJ (2003) Phycoremediation: key issues for cost-effective nutrient removal process. Biotechnol Adv 22:1–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-9750(03)00130-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Onal M (2006) Determination of chemical formula of a smectite. Community Fac Sci 52(2):1–6Google Scholar
  52. Panitchagul A, Noisangiam R, Tittabutr P, Teaumroong N, Kitkamthorn U (2014) Thermodynamics of biosorption of Zn and Cu in aqueous solution by Rhodopseudomonas boonkerdi sp. strain NS 20 and Bradyrhizobium sp. strain DO A9. International conference on advances in engineering and technologyGoogle Scholar
  53. Pathak RK, Dikshit AK (2013) Screening of bacterial biosorbents for removal of atrazine. Clean Techn Environ Policy 15:921–929.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-012-0545-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pathak VV, Kothari R, Chopra AK, Singh DP (2015) Experimental and kinetic studies for phycoremediation and dye removal by Chlorella pyrenoidosa from textile wastewater. J Environ Manag 163:270–277.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.08.041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pérez-Ibarbia L, Majdanski T, Schubert S, Windhab N, Schubert US (2016) Safety and regulatory review of dyes commonly used as excipients in pharmaceutical and nutraceutical applications. Eup J Pharma Sci 93:264–273.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2016.08.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Prasad RK (2009) Color removal from distillery spent wash through coagulation using Moringa oleifera seeds: use of optimum response surface methodology. J Hazard Mater 165:804–811.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.10.068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Raslavicius L, Semenov VG, Chernova NI, Kersys A, Kopeyka AK (2014) Producing transportation fuels from algae: in search of synergy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 40:133–142.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rubı’n E, Rodrı’guez P, Herrero R, de Vicente MES (2010) Adsorption of methylene blue on chemically modified algal biomass: equilibrium, dynamic, and surface data. J Chem Eng Data 55:5707–5714.  https://doi.org/10.1021/je100666vCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ruiz J, Alvarez P, Arbib Z, Garrido C, Barragan J, Perales JA (2011) Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus concentration ontheir removal kinetic in treated urban wastewater by Chlorella vulgaris. Int J Phytoremediation 13:884–896.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2011.573823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Saha PD, Bhattacharya P, Sinha K, Chowdhury S (2013) Biosorption of Congo red and Indigo carmine by nonviable biomass of a new Dietzia strain isolated from the effluent of a textile industry. Desalin Water Treat 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2012.762589
  61. Sambusiti C, Bellucci M, Zabaniotou A, Beneduce L, Monlau F (2015) Algae as promising feed stocks for fermentative biohydrogen production according to a biorefinery approach: a comprehensive review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 44:20–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sari A, Tuzen M (2008) Biosorption of cadmium (II) from aqueous solution by red algae (Ceramium virgatum): equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. J Hazard Mater 157:448–454.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.01.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Satapathy MK, Das P (2013) Optimization of crystal violet dye removal using novel soil-silver nanocomposite as nanoadsorbent using response surface methodology. J Environ Chem Eng 205:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2013.11.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Satapathy MK, Banerjee P, Das P (2015) Plant-mediated synthesis of silver-nanocomposite as novel effective azo dye adsorbent. Appl Nanosci 5:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-013-0286-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sengupta S, Das P, Mukhopadhyay A, Datta A (2017) Microbial biosorption and improved/genetically modified biosorbents for toxic metal removal and thermodynamics. In: Handbook of metal-microbe interactions and bioremediation, vol 267. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  66. Sharma P, Singh L, Dilbaghi N (2009) Response surface methodological approach for the decolorization of simulated dye effluent using Aspergillus fumigatus fresenius. J Hazard Mater 161(2):1081–1086.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.04.085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tobin JM, White C, Metal GGM (1994) Accumulation by fungi: applications in environment biotechnology. J Ind Microbiol 13:126–130.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01584110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Toor MK (2010) Enhancing adsorption capacity of bentonite for dye removal: physiochemical modification and characterization, The University of Adelaide, Australia. http://hdl.handle.net/2440/66283
  69. Ullah K, Ahmad M, Sofia Sharma VK, Lu P, Harvey A, Zafar M et al (2015) Assessing the potential of algal biomass opportunities for bioenergy industry: a review. Fuel 143:414–423.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.10.064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vassilev SV, Vassileva CG (2016) Composition, properties and challenges of algae biomass for biofuel application: an overview. Fuel 181:1–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.04.106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Verma AK, Dash RR, Bhunia P (2012) A review on chemical coagulation/flocculation technologies for removal of color from textile wastewaters. J Environ Manag 93:154–168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.09.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Vijayaraghavan K, Yun YS (2008) Bacterial biosorbents and biosorption. Biotechnol Adv 26:266–291.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wang J, Chen C (2009) Biosorbents for heavy metals removal and their future. Biotechnol Adv 27:195–226.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wawrzkiewicz M (2011) Comparison of gel anion exchangers of various basicity in direct dye removal from aqueous solutions and wastewaters. Chem Eng J 173:773–781.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.08.048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Weber WJ, Jr. (2008) Adsorption theory, concepts and models. In: Slejko FL, editor. Adsorption technology: a step-by-step approach to process evaluation and application; 1985. p. 9–15. literature. Prog Polym Sci 33:399–447Google Scholar
  76. Yadav R, Srivastava D (2009) Studies on the process variables of the condensation reaction of cardanol and formaldehyde by response surface methodology. Eur Polym J 45:946–952.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.11.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zeroual Y, Kim BS, Kim CS, Blaghen M, Lee KM (2006) Biosorption of Bromophenol blue from aqueous solutions by Rhizopus stolonifer biomass. Water Air Soil Pollut 177:135–146.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-006-9112-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zhan Y, Li H, Chen Y (2010) Copper hydroxyphosphate as catalyst for the wet hydrogen peroxide oxidation of azo dyes. J Hazard Mater 180:481–485.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.04.055CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Uttariya Roy
    • 1
  • Suvendu Manna
    • 1
  • Shubhalakshmi Sengupta
    • 1
  • Papita Das
    • 1
  • Siddhartha Datta
    • 1
  • Aniruddha Mukhopadhyay
    • 2
  • Avijit Bhowal
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringJadavpur UniversityKolkataIndia
  2. 2.Department of Environmental ScienceUniversity of CalcuttaKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations