Advertisement

Double Dissimulation: Counterfeit Disability in Bartholomew Fair

  • Lindsey Row-Heyveld
Chapter
Part of the Literary Disability Studies book series (LIDIST)

Abstract

This chapter explores how Ben Jonson uses the counterfeit-disability tradition as a tool for literary and social critique. Jonson stages dissembled disability twice in Bartholomew Fair (1614), only to send it up—and, by extension, mock playwrights like John Marston who employed it. By transporting the counterfeit-disability trope from tragedy to comedy, Jonson makes audience reaction, rather than theatrical action, the real source of spectacle in Bartholomew Fair. This generic translation insists on counterfeit disability’s flaws as both a stage trope and an instrument of audience instruction. Yet, while Jonson critiques the counterfeit-disability tradition, this chapter also illustrates how he uses it both to criticize the systems of power that sought to define disability in early modern England and, simultaneously, to suggest that disability was difficult to detect, always potentially false, and undeserving of charity.

References

  1. Aggeler, Geoffrey. “Ben Jonson’s Justice Overdo and Joseph Hall’s Good Magistrate.” English Studies 76, no. 5 (September 1995): 434–42.Google Scholar
  2. An Act for the Punishment of Vagabonds, and for the Relief of the Poor and Impotent (14 Eliz. I c. 5).Google Scholar
  3. An Ease for Oversseers of the Poore. London, 1601.Google Scholar
  4. Bednarz, James P. “Marston’s Subversion of Shakespeare and Jonson: Histriomastix and the War of the Theaters.” Medieval and Renaissance Drama in England 6 (1993): 103–28.Google Scholar
  5. ———. “Writing and Revenge: John Marston’s Histriomastix.” Comparative Drama 36, no. 1/2 (Spring/Summer 2002): 21–51.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, Andrew. “Theatre of Judgment: Space, Spectators, and the Epistemology of Law in Bartholomew Fair.” Early Theatre 15, no. 2 (July 2012): 154–67.Google Scholar
  7. Cathcart, Charles. Marston, Rivalry, Rapprochement, and Jonson. New York: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar
  8. Chambers, E. K. The Elizabethan Stage. Vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1923.Google Scholar
  9. Chaplin, Gregory. “‘Divided Amongst Themselves’: Collaboration and Anxiety in Jonson’s Volpone.” English Literary History 69, no. 1 (Spring 2002): 57–81.Google Scholar
  10. D., N. An Antidote against Melancholy Made Up in Pills, Compounded of Witty Ballads, Jovial Songs and Merry Catches. London, 1661.Google Scholar
  11. Dalton, Michael. The Countrey Justice. London, 1618. RB 243254, The Huntington Library, San Marino, California.Google Scholar
  12. Dekker, Thomas. “Satiromastix.” In Materialien zur Kunde des älteren Englischen Dramas [Materials for the Study of Old English Drama], vol. 20, edited by Hans Scherer. Louvain: A. Uystpruyst, 1907.Google Scholar
  13. “enormity, n.”. OED Online. December 2016. Oxford University Press. Accessed 17 March 2017. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/62536?redirectedFrom=enormity#eid.
  14. Faber, Paul L. “Overdo’s Mad Moniker: ‘Arthur of Bradley’ in Jonson’s Bartholomew Fair.” Ben Jonson Journal 20, no. 1 (May 2013): 126–35.Google Scholar
  15. Ferreira-Ross, Jeanette. “Religion and the Law in Jonson’s Bartholomew Fair.” Renaissance and Reformation/Renaissance et Réforme 18, no. 2 (Spring 1994): 45–66.Google Scholar
  16. Heller, Benjamin. “The ‘Mene Peuple’ and the Polite Spectator: The Individual in the Crowd at Eighteenth-Century London Fairs.” Past & Present 208, no. 1 (August 2010): 131–57.Google Scholar
  17. Herford, C. H., and Percy Simpson, eds. Ben Jonson. Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon, 1923.Google Scholar
  18. Horace. The Epistles of Horace, 1st ed. Edited and translated by David Ferry, 195–6. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2001.Google Scholar
  19. Houser, David J. “Purging the Commonwealth: Marston’s Disguised Dukes and A Knack to Know a Knave.” PMLA 89, no. 5 (October 1974): 993–1006.Google Scholar
  20. Hunter, G. K. “English Folly and Italian Vice: The Moral Landscape of John Marston.” In Stratford-Upon-Avon Studies, No. 1, edited by John Russell Brown and Bernard Harris, 85–111. London: Arnold, 1960.Google Scholar
  21. Hutson, Lorna. “Imagining Justice: Kantorowicz and Shakespeare.” Representations 160, no. 1 (Spring 2009): 118–42.Google Scholar
  22. Jonson, Ben. “Bartholomew Fair.” In English Renaissance Drama, edited by David Bevington, 969–1065. New York: Norton, 2002.Google Scholar
  23. Kay, W. David. “Bartholomew Fair: Ben Jonson in Praise of Folly.” English Literary Renaissance 6, no. 2 (Spring 1976): 299–316.Google Scholar
  24. Lee, Umphrey. “Bartholomew Fair and the Popular Dramatic Tradition.” Louisburg College Journal of Arts and Sciences 1 (June 1967): 6–16.Google Scholar
  25. Lippincott, H. F. “King Lear and the Fools of Robert Armin.” Shakespeare Quarterly 26, no. 3 (Summer 1975): 243–53.Google Scholar
  26. Marston, John. Antonio’s Revenge. Edited by W. Reavley Gair. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  27. ———. “The Malcontent.” In English Renaissance Drama, edited by David Bevington, 550–613. New York: Norton, 2002.Google Scholar
  28. McAdam, Ian. “The Puritan Dialectic of Law and Grace in Bartholomew Fair.” Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 46, no. 2 (Spring 2006): 415–33.Google Scholar
  29. McPherson, David. “The Origins of Overdo: A Study in Jonsonian Invention.” Modern Language Quarterly 37, no. 3 (September 1976): 221–33.Google Scholar
  30. Quarmby, Kevin A. The Disguised Ruler in Shakespeare and His Contemporaries. Farnham: Ashgate, 2012.Google Scholar
  31. Rowe, George E. “Ben Jonson’s Quarrel with Audience and Its Renaissance Context.” Studies in Philology 81, no. 4 (Autumn 1984): 447.Google Scholar
  32. Rushton, Peter. “Lunatics and Idiots: Mental Disability, the Community, and the Poor Law in North-East England.” Medical History 32, no. 1 (February 1988): 34–50.Google Scholar
  33. Salingar, Leo. “Jacobean Playwrights and ‘Judicious’ Spectators.” Renaissance Drama 22 (1991): 209–34.Google Scholar
  34. Scodel, Joshua. The English Poetic Epitaph: Commemoration and Conflict from Jonson to Wordsworth. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  35. Semonin, Paul. “Monsters in the Marketplace: Human Oddities in Early Modern England.” In Freakery: Cultural Spectacles of the Extraordinary Body, edited by Rosemarie Garland-Thomson, 69–81. New York: New York University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  36. Shuger, Debora K. “Hypocrites and Puppets in Bartholomew Fair.” Modern Philology 82, no. 1 (August 1984): 70–3.Google Scholar
  37. Simons, Jay. “Stinging, Barking, Biting, Purging: Jonson’s Bartholomew Fair and the Debate on Satire in the Poetomachia.” Ben Jonson Journal 20, no. 1 (2013): 20–37.Google Scholar
  38. Stanev, Hristomir A. Sensory Experience and the Metropolis on the Jacobean Stage (1603–1625). Farnham: Ashgate, 2014.Google Scholar
  39. Tudeau-Clayton, Margaret. “‘I Do Not Know My Selfe’: The Topography and Politics of Self-Knowledge in Ben Jonson’s Bartholomew Fair.” In Textures of Renaissance Knowledge, edited by Philippa Berry and Margaret Tudeau-Clayton, 177–98. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  40. Welsford, Enid. The Fool: His Social and Literary History (Gloucester: Peter Smith, 1996).Google Scholar
  41. Woodbridge, Linda. “Imposters, Monsters, and Spies: What Rogue Literature Can Tell Us about Early Modern Subjectivity.” Early Modern Literary Studies, Special Issue 9 (January 2002): 4.1–11.Google Scholar
  42. ———. Vagrancy, Homelessness, and English Renaissance Literature. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  43. Yearling, Rebecca Kate. Ben Jonson, John Marston, and Early Modern Drama: Satire and Audience. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lindsey Row-Heyveld
    • 1
  1. 1.Luther CollegeDecorahUSA

Personalised recommendations