Advertisement

Introduction: Dissembling Disability in Early Modern English Drama

  • Lindsey Row-Heyveld
Chapter
Part of the Literary Disability Studies book series (LIDIST)

Abstract

In 40 sixteenth- and early seventeenth-century plays, able-bodied characters counterfeit disability. In this introduction, Row-Heyveld contends that these plays constitute a distinct theatrical tradition. In spite of its popularity, the counterfeit-disability tradition has remained unnoted by scholars. This chapter accounts for that oversight and argues for the need to recognize this tradition as an important part of disability history and early modern drama. In identifying this tradition, Row-Heyveld seeks to recover some of the contexts of early modern disability, in particular the ways in which disability was (re)formed through the period’s discourses and practices of charity. Changing approaches to almsgiving led to increasing concerns about counterfeit disability, powering a feedback loop of performance and suspicion. These contexts provided fertile material for the theater, and the chapter surveys the multifaceted appeal of counterfeit disability for the early modern stage.

References

  1. Bacon, Nathaniel. The Official Papers of Sir Nathaniel Bacon of Stiffkey, Norfolk as Justice of the Peace, 1580–1620. Edited by H. W. Saunders. London: Offices of the Royal Historical Society, 1915.Google Scholar
  2. Ben-Amos, Ilana Krausman. The Culture of Giving: Informal Support and Gift-Exchange in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  3. Berkson, Gershon. “Mental Disabilities in Western Civilization from Ancient Rome to Prerogativa Regis.” Mental Retardation 44, no. 1 (2006): 28–40.Google Scholar
  4. Carroll, William C. “‘The Base Shall Top Th’Legitimate’: The Bedlam Beggar and the Role of Edgar in King Lear.” Shakespeare Quarterly 38, no. 4 (Winter 1987): 426–41.Google Scholar
  5. ———. Fat King, Lean Beggar: Representations of Poverty in the Age of Shakespeare. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  6. Dalton, Michael. The Countrey Justice. London, 1618. RB 243254, The Huntington Library, San Marino, CA.Google Scholar
  7. Dekker, Thomas. O Per Se O. London, 1612.Google Scholar
  8. Dickie, Simon. “Cripples, Hunchbacks, and the Limits of Sympathy.” In Cruelty and Laughter: Forgotten Comic Literature and the Unsentimental Eighteenth Century, 45–110. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar
  9. Dionne, Craig. “Fashioning Outlaws: The Early Modern Rogue and Urban Culture.” In Rogues and Early Modern English Culture, edited by Craig Dionne and Steve Mentz, 33–61. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  10. Donne, John. “The Epigrams, Epithalamions, Epitaphs, Inscriptions, and Miscellaneous Poems.” In The Variorum Edition of the Poetry of John Donne, vol. 8, edited by Gary A. Stringer and Ted-Larry Pebworth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  11. Freeburg, Victor Oscar. Disguise Plots in Elizabethan Drama: A Study in Stage Tradition. New York: Columbia University Press, 1915.Google Scholar
  12. Fumerton, Patricia. Unsettled: The Culture of Mobility and the Working Poor in Early Modern England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  13. Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Physical Disability in American Culture and Literature. New York: Colombia University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  14. Happé, Peter. “Jonson’s On-stage Audiences: Spectaret populum ludis attentius ipsis.” Ben Jonson Journal 10 (2003): 23–41.Google Scholar
  15. Harman, Thomas. A Caveat or Warening for Common Cursetors Vulgarely Called Vagabones. London, 1567.Google Scholar
  16. Heal, Felicity. Hospitality in Early Modern England. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  17. Henke, Robert. “Poor.” In Early Modern Theatricality, edited by Henry S. Turner, 460–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  18. ———. Poverty and Charity in Early Modern Theater and Performance. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 2015.Google Scholar
  19. Hindle, Steve. “Dearth, Fasting, and Alms: The Campaign for General Hospitality in Early Modern England.” Past and Present 172 (2001): 44–86.Google Scholar
  20. ———. On the Parish? The Micro-Politics of Poor Relief in Rural England. Oxford: Clarendon, 2004.Google Scholar
  21. ———. The State and Social Change in Early Modern England, c. 1550–1640. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  22. Hobgood, Allison P., and David Houston Wood. “Disabled Shakespeares: Introduction.” Disability Studies Quarterly 29, no. 4 (Fall 2009): n. p. Accessed 25 April 2017. http://dsq-sds.org/article/review/991/1183.
  23. ———. “Ethical Staring: Disabling the English Renaissance.” In Recovering Disability in Early Modern England, edited by David Houston Wood and Allison P. Hobgood, 1–22. Columbus: The Ohio University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  24. Hyland, Peter. Disguise on the Early Modern English Stage. Farnham: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
  25. Jackson, Ken. “‘I Know Not/Where I did Lodge Last Night?’: Shakespeare’s King Lear and the Search for Bethlem (Bedlam) Hospital.” English Literary Renaissance 30, no. 2 (March 2000): 213–40.Google Scholar
  26. Jayne, Sears. “Charity in King Lear.” Shakespeare Quarterly 15, no. 2 (1964): 277–88.Google Scholar
  27. Kernan, Alvin B. “Shakespeare’s Stage Audiences: The Playwright’s Reflections and Control of Audience Response.” In Shakespeare’s Craft: Eight Lectures, edited by Philip H. Highfill, 138–55. Carbondale and Edwardsville: George Washington University by Southern Illinois University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  28. Leonard, E. M. The Early History of English Poor Relief. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1900.Google Scholar
  29. Lopez, Jeremy. Theatrical Convention and Audience Response in Early Modern Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  30. Low, Jennifer A. “Early Modern Audiences and the Pleasures of Cross-Dressed Characters.” Poetics Today 35, no. 4 (Winter 2014): 561–89.Google Scholar
  31. McDonagh, Patrick. Idiocy: A Cultural History. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  32. Metzler, Irina. Fools and Idiots?: Intellectual Disability in the Middle Ages. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
  33. Myhill, Nova. “Taking the Stage: Spectators as Spectacle in the Caroline Private Theaters.” In Imagining the Audience in Early Modern Drama, 1558–1642, edited by Jennifer A. Low and Nova Myhill, 37–54. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.Google Scholar
  34. Pories, Kathleen. “The Intersection of Poor Laws and Literature in the Sixteenth Century: Fictional and Factual Categories.” In Framing Elizabethan Fictions: Contemporary Approaches to Early Modern Narrative Prose, edited by Constance C. Relihan, 17–40. Kent: Kent State University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  35. Priestley, Mark, ed. Disability and the Life Course: Global Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  36. Pugliatti, Paola. Beggary and Theatre in Early Modern England. Burlington: Ashgate, 2003.Google Scholar
  37. Robb, Hannah. “Purses and the Charitable Gift.” Journal of Social History 49, no. 2 (Winter 2015): 387–405.Google Scholar
  38. Robertson, Kellie. “Epilogue: Vagrant Spaces.” In The Laborer’s Two Bodies: Literary and Legal Productions in Britain, 1350–1500, edited by Kellie Robertson, 183–93. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2005.Google Scholar
  39. Rochester, Joanne. Staging Spectatorship in the Plays of Philip Massinger. Burlington: Ashgate, 2013.Google Scholar
  40. Rogers, Samuel. “The Poore’s Pension: A Sermon Preached in Gregories Church in Sudbury in the County of Suffolke, May 12, 1643, upon Occasion of the Charitable Reliefe that Yearly then, and there is Given, towards the Covering or Clothing of a Hundred Poore People, According to the Will of the Donour Mr. Martine Cole, Late of the Towne Aforesaid Deceased.” London, 1644.Google Scholar
  41. Safley, Thomas Max. “Introduction.” In The Reformation of Charity: The Secular and the Religious in Early Modern Poor Relief, edited by Thomas Max Safley, 1–14. Boston: Brill, 2003.Google Scholar
  42. Shakespeare, William. King Lear. Edited by R. A. Foakes. Arden Shakespeare, 3rd series. London: Bloomsbury, 1997.Google Scholar
  43. Siebers, Tobin. “Disability as Masquerade.” Literature and Medicine 23, no. 1 (Spring 2004): 1–22.Google Scholar
  44. Slack, Paul. Poverty and Policy in Tudor and Stuart England. London: Addison-Wesley, 1988.Google Scholar
  45. Stainton, Timothy. “Reason, Grace, and Charity: Augustine and the Impact of Church Doctrine on the Construction of Intellectual Disability.” Disability & Society 23, no. 5 (2008): 485–96.Google Scholar
  46. Stanleyes Remedy: Or, the Way How to Reform Wandring Beggers, Theeves, High-Way Robbers and Pick-Pockets. London, 1646. 266571, Folger Shakespeare Library, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  47. Stone, Deborah A. The Disabled State. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  48. Townsend, Peter. Poverty and Disability. London: Disability Alliance, 1975.Google Scholar
  49. Turner, David M. “‘Fraudulent’ Disability in Historical Perspective.” History and Policy (February 2012): n.p. Accessed 1 June 2017. http://www.historyandpolicy.org/policy-papers/papers/fraudulent-disability-in-historical-perspective.
  50. van Elk, Martine. “The Counterfeit Vagrant: The Dynamic of Deviance in the Bridewell Court Records and the Literature of Roguery.” In Rogues and Early Modern English Culture, edited by Craig Dionne and Steve Mentz, 120–39. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  51. Wheatley, Edward. Stumbling Blocks before the Blind: Medieval Constructions of a Disability. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2010.Google Scholar
  52. Woodbridge, Linda. Vagrancy, Homelessness, and English Renaissance Literature. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  53. Yearling, Rebecca Kate. Ben Jonson, John Marston, and Early Modern Drama: Satire and Audience. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lindsey Row-Heyveld
    • 1
  1. 1.Luther CollegeDecorahUSA

Personalised recommendations