Private Label Consumers and National Brand New Products: An Empirical Investigation

  • Ian Clark SinapuelasEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)


Previous research finds that national brands take market shares from private labels when they introduce new products. Which consumers they attract with the new product introduction however remains unknown. Using data from the carbonated beverage category and a cure model approach, this research empirically investigates which consumer segments are regained. Our results suggest that new national brands mostly regain brand users, though they are more likely to attract light private label users. Our results have implications for national brand managers designing launch and targeting strategies and for private label managers designing defensive strategies.


New products Purchase adoption Private label share Split population 


  1. Abril, C., Sanchez, J., & García-Madariaga, J. (2015). The effect of product innovation, promotion, and price on consumer switching to private labels. Journal of Marketing Channels, 22(3), 192–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ailawadi, K. L., & Harlam, B. (2004). An empirical analysis of the determinants of retail margins: The role of store-brand share. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 147–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartels, J., & Reinders, M. J. (2011). Consumer innovativeness and its correlates: A propositional inventory for future research. Journal of Business Research, 64(6), 601–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brakus, J. J., Schmitt, B. H., & Zarantonello, L. (2009). Brand experience: What is it? How is it measured? Does it affect loyalty? Journal of marketing, 73(3), 52–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bronnenberg, B. J., Kruger, M. W., & Mela, C. F. (2008). Database paper: The IRI marketing data set. Marketing Science, 27(4), 745–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Geyskens, I., Gielens, K., & Gijsbrechts, E. (2010). Proliferating private label portfolios: How introducing economy and premium private labels influence brand choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(5), 791–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gielens, K. (2012). New products: The antidote to private label growth? Journal of Marketing Research, 49(3), 408–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gielens, K., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. (2007). Drivers of consumer acceptance of new packaged goods: An investigation across products and countries. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(2), 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kara, A., Rojas-Méndez, J. I., Kucukemiroglu, O., & Harcar, T. (2009). Consumer preferences of store brands: Role of prior experiences and value consciousness. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 17(2), 127–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kumar, N., & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (2007). Private label strategy: How to meet the store brand challenge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  11. Lambert, P. C. (2007). Modeling of the cure fraction in survival studies. Stata Journal, 7(3), 351.Google Scholar
  12. Muruganantham, G., & Priyadharshini, K. (2017). Antecedents and consequences of private brand purchase: A systematic review and a conceptual framework. International Journal of Retail &Distribution Management, 45(6), 660–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Peng, Y., & Taylor, J. M. (2014). Cure models. Handbook of Survival Analysis, 113–134.Google Scholar
  14. Rindova, V. P., & Petkova, A. P. (2007). When is a new thing a good thing? Technological change, product form design, and perceptions of value for product innovations. Organization Science, 18(2), 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sethuraman, R., & Gielens, K. (2014). Determinants of store brand share. Journal of Retailing, 90(2), 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sinapuelas, I. C. S., Wang, H. M. D., & Bohlmann, J. D. (2015). The interplay of innovation, brand, and marketing mix variables in line extensions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(5), 558–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.San Francisco State UniversitySan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations