Advertisement

TMAP Design Cards for Technology-Mediated Audience Participation in Live Music

  • Oliver HödlEmail author
  • Fares Kayali
  • Geraldine Fitzpatrick
  • Simon Holland
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series on Cultural Computing book series (SSCC)

Abstract

Historically, audiences have had various ways to participate in live music performances, including clapping, dancing, swaying, whistling, and singing. More recently, mobile and wireless devices, such as smartphones have opened up powerful new opportunities for audience participation. However, design for technology-mediated audience participation (TMAP) can be challenging: musicians and audiences have different demands, as does the coherence of the music, and group needs can vary widely. Thus, effective TMAP design requires the balancing of knowledge from diverse perspectives and must take into account the needs of diverse roles in creating and supporting performances. This chapter focuses on the process of creating and evaluating a set of design cards to support the interaction design and evaluation of TMAP systems. The cards are based on a previously created descriptive framework for supporting interaction design and evaluation in this challenging area. We discuss the conception and development of the TMAP design cards in some detail, and present an empirical study to evaluate their practical usefulness. Particular attention is paid to the ability of the cards to support finding ideas, changing ideas, and examining ideas from different perspectives.

References

  1. Ebertz A (2009) IdeenRausch—111 Impulse für neue Ideen. Lardon MediaGoogle Scholar
  2. Freeman J (2005) Large audience participation, technology, and orchestral performance. In: Proceedings of the international computer music conference, pp 757–760Google Scholar
  3. Hödl O (2016) The design of technology-mediated audience participation in live music. PhD thesis, Vienna University of Technology. http://katalog.ub.tuwien.ac.at/AC13248942. Accessed 13 March 2018
  4. Hornecker E (2010) Creative idea exploration within the structure of a guiding framework: the card brainstorming game. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on tangible embedded and embodied interaction, vol 10, pp 101–108Google Scholar
  5. IDEO (2002) IDEO method cards: 51 ways to inspire design. https://www.ideo.com/work/method-cards. Accessed 13 March 2018
  6. Kaiser G, Ekblad G, Broling L (2007) Audience participation in a dance-club context: design of a system for collaborative creation of visuals. In: Proceedings of design inquiriesGoogle Scholar
  7. Keaney S (2003) Design council/intangible assets cards. In: Cato K (ed) First choice. The Images Publishing Group, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  8. Lockton DJG (2013) Design with Intent: a design pattern toolkit for environmental & social behaviour change. PhD thesis, Brunel University, 2013Google Scholar
  9. Mazzanti D, Zappi V, Caldwell D, Brogni A (2014) Augmented stage for participatory performances. In: Proceedings of the international conference on NIME, pp 29–34Google Scholar
  10. Mozart WA (1793) Anleitung so viel Walzer oder Schleifer mit zwei Würfeln zu componiren so viel man will ohne musikalisch zu seyn noch etwas von der Composition zu verstehen. N. Simrock, BonnGoogle Scholar
  11. Neuhaus M (1994) The broadcast works and audium. Zeitgleich: the symposium, the seminar, the exhibition, pp 1–19Google Scholar
  12. Pricken M, Klell C (2006) Kribbeln im Kopf—creative sessions. Schmidt (Hermann), MainzGoogle Scholar
  13. Von Oech R (2003) Innovative whack pack. United States Games SystemsGoogle Scholar
  14. Weitzner N, Freeman J, Garrett S, Chen Y-L (2012) massMobile—an audience participation framework. In: Proceedings of the international conference on new interfaces for musical expression, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, pp 1–4 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oliver Hödl
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fares Kayali
    • 2
  • Geraldine Fitzpatrick
    • 2
  • Simon Holland
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Computer Science, Cooperative Systems Research GroupUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
  2. 2.Institute for Design and Assessment of TechnologyVienna University of Technology (TU Wien)ViennaAustria
  3. 3.Music Computing Lab, Centre for Research in ComputingThe Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations