Advertisement

Long-Term Appropriation of Smartwatches Among a Group of Older People

  • Andrea RosalesEmail author
  • Mireia Fernández-Ardèvol
  • Núria Ferran-Ferrer
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10926)

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze long-term appropriation of smartwatches among a group of older people. For the purpose of the study, we provided five older individuals (aged 71 to 80; three women, two men) with Android smartwatches. We interviewed participants after 2 and 12 months of smartwatch usage and observed its usage in an informal gathering 12 months after the end of the study. Drawing on Morville’s model of user experience (2004), we focus on how the smartwatch was (not) useful, usable, valuable, and desirable for each participant in each stage of the process. Results show the relevance of valuableness and desirability in the (non-)appropriation of smartwatches for those participants. Specifically, participants used the smartwatches to express their sporty, techie and fashion identities.

Keywords

Older people Wearable Smartwatch Appropriation UX 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to all the participants of our study for having allowed us to become members and feel part of their communities at Àgora. This research project has been partially funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (FJCI-2015-24120) and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada through the Ageing + Communication + Technologies project (895-2013-1018).

References

  1. 1.
    Motti, V.G., Caine, K.: Smart wearables or dumb wearables? In: Proceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication - SIGDOC 2016, pp. 1–10. ACM Press, New York (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2987592.2987606
  2. 2.
    Rosales, A., Sayago, S., Blat, J.: Beeping socks and chirping arm bands: wearables that foster free play. IEEE Comput. 48(6), 41–48 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2015.168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ehrler, F., Lovis, C.: Supporting elderly homecare with smartwatches: advantages and drawbacks. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 205, 667–671 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Casilari, E., Oviedo-Jiménez, M.A.: Automatic fall detection system based on the combined use of a smartphone and a smartwatch. PLoS ONE 10(11), 1–11 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Silverstone, R., Haddon, L.: Design and the domestication of ICTs: technical change and everyday life. In: Silverstone, R., Mansell R. (eds.) Communication by Design. The Politics of Information and Communication Technologies, p. 74. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chuah, S.H.-W., Rauschnabel, P.A., Krey, N., Nguyen, B., Ramayah, T., Lade, S.: Wearable technologies: the role of usefulness and visibility in smartwatch adoption. Comput. Hum. Behav. 65, 276–284 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wu, L.H., Wu, L.C., Chang, S.C.: Exploring consumers’ intention to accept smartwatch. Comput. Hum. Behav. 64, 383–392 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lundell, J., Bates, C.: Understanding user experience journeys for a smart watch device. In: Nah, F.H., Tan, C.H. (eds.) HCIBGO 2016. LNCS, vol. 9752, pp. 424–433. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39399-5_40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jeong, H., Kim, H., Kim, R., Lee, U., Jeong, Y.: Smartwatch wearing behavior analysis. In: Proceedings of Conference on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable Ubiquitous Technology, vol. 1, pp. 1–31 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3131892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Visuri, A., Sarsenbayeva, Z., van Berkel, N., Goncalves, J., Rawassizadeh, R., Kostakos, V., Ferreira, D.: Quantifying sources and types of smartwatch usage sessions. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2017, pp. 3569–3581. ACM Press, New York (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025817
  11. 11.
    Liu, X., Chen, T., Qian, F., Guo, Z., Lin, F.X., Wang, X., Chen, K.: Characterizing smartwatch usage in the wild. In: Proceedings of Conference on Mobile System Application and Services (MobiSys 2017), pp. 385–398 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3081333.3081351
  12. 12.
    Min, C., Kang, S., Yoo, C., Cha, J., Choi, S., Oh, Y., Song, J.: Exploring current practices for battery use and management of smartwatches. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wearable Computers - ISWC 2015, pp. 11–18. ACM Press, New York (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2802083.2802085
  13. 13.
    Schirra, S., Bentley, F.R.: It’s kind of like an extra screen for my phone. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA 2015. pp. 2151–2156. ACM Press, New York (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2732931
  14. 14.
    Cecchinato, M.E., Cox, A.L., Bird, J.: Always on(line)? In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2017. pp. 3557–3568. ACM Press, New York (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025538
  15. 15.
    McMillan, D., Brown, B., Lampinen, A., McGregor, M., Hoggan, E., Pizza, S.: Situating wearables. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2017, pp. 3582–3594. ACM Press, New York (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025993
  16. 16.
    Quintana, R., Quintana, C., Madeira, C., Slotta, J.D.: Keeping watch. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA 2016, pp. 2272–2278. ACM Press, New York (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892493
  17. 17.
    Fernández-Ardèvol, M., Rosales, A.: My interests, my activities: learning from an intergenerational comparison of smartwatch use. In: Zhou, J., Salvendy, G. (eds.) ITAP 2017. LNCS, vol. 10298, pp. 114–129. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58536-9_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cecchinato, M.E., Cox, A.L., Bird, J.: Smartwatches. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA 2015, pp. 2133–2138. ACM Press, New York (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2732837
  19. 19.
    Choi, J., Kim, S.: Is the smartwatch an IT product or a fashion product? A study on factors affecting the intention to use smartwatches. Comput. Hum. Behav. 63, 777–786 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jung, Y., Kim, S., Choi, B.: Consumer valuation of the wearables: the case of smartwatches. Comput. Hum. Behav. 63, 899–905 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Creswell, J.W.: Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (2003)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Morville, P.: User Experience Design. http://semanticstudios.com/user_experience_design/
  23. 23.
    Blomberg, J., Burrell, M.: An ethnographic approach to design. In: Jacko, J.A., Sears, A. (eds.) The Human Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies, and Emerging Applications, pp. 965–988. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, (2003)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bossen, C., Dindler, C., Iversen, O.S.: User gains and PD aims. In: Proceedings of the Biennial Participatory Design Conference on - PDC 2010, p. 141. ACM Press, New York (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1900441.1900461
  25. 25.
    Righi, V., Sayago, S., Ferreira, S., Rosales, A., Blat, J.: Co-designing with a community of older learners for over 10 years by moving user-driven participation from the margin to the centre. CoDes. Int. J. CoCreation (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2018.1424206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lyons, K.: What can a dumb watch teach a smartwatch? In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wearable Computers - ISWC 2015, pp. 3–10. ACM Press, New York (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2802083.2802084
  27. 27.
    Kim, D., Lee, Y., Rho, S., Lim, Y.: Design opportunities in three stages of relationship development between users and self-tracking devices. In: Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors Computing System - CHI 2016, 699–703 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858148
  28. 28.
    Pizza, S., Brown, B., McMillan, D., Lampinen, A.: Smartwatch in vivo. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2016, pp. 5456–5469. ACM Press, New York (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858522
  29. 29.
    Sol, R., Baras, K.: Assessment of activity trackers. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing Adjunct - UbiComp 2016, pp. 570–575. ACM Press, New York (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2968219.2968323
  30. 30.
    du Gay, P., Hall, S., Janes, L., Madsen, H., Mackay, H., Negus, K.: Doing Cultural Studies: The Story of the Sony Walkman. Sage Publications Inc., London (2013)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of innovations (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea Rosales
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mireia Fernández-Ardèvol
    • 1
  • Núria Ferran-Ferrer
    • 1
  1. 1.Universitat Oberta de CatalunyaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations