Advertisement

Chiloé pp 21-37 | Cite as

Local Knowledge, Local Networks, and Successful Cooperative Mussel Aquaculture on Chiloé

  • Ana Pitchon
Chapter
Part of the Ethnobiology book series (EBL)

Abstract

The impact of aquaculture in southern Chile has been significant on both an ecological and a social scale. Social-ecological changes on the Chiloé Archipelago are altering relationships between humans and the natural resources that they rely on for subsistence and income. Artsisanal fisheries, in particular, have felt this change, as international, large-scale salmon farms have spread across the region, causing a disruption of ecosystem services and livelihoods. Through a case study of an aquaculture cooperative in a Chilote community, I explain how small-scale, locally managed aquaculture firms of an endemic mollusk species can serve as a model for social-ecological resilience, as well as sustainable aquaculture, communities, and ecosystems.

References

  1. Acheson, James. 1981. Anthropology of fishing. Annual Review of Anthropology 10: 275–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aqua. 2017. Moluscos y Algas en 2016: Los otros cultivos que mueven la acuicultura nacional. May 17. http://www.aqua.cl/reportajes/moluscosalgas-2016-los-otros-cultivos-mueven-la-acuicultura-nacional/.
  3. Aquanoticias. 2002. Producción. March. Santiago, Chile.Google Scholar
  4. Barrett, Gene, Mauricio Caniggia, and Lorna Read. 2002. There are more vets than doctors in Chiloé: Social and community impact of the globalization of aquaculture in Chile. World Development 30 (11): 1951–1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caniggia, Mauricio. 2000. Evaluación ex post facto del programa de desarrollo de la maricultura y procesamiento de moluscos en comunidades rurales costeras de Chiloé-Chile. Tesis para optar al grado de Magister en Desarrollo Rural, Universidad Austral de Chile.Google Scholar
  6. D’Anna, Linda, and Grant Murray. 2015. Perceptions of shellfish aquaculture in British Columbia and implications for well-being in marine socialecological systems. Ecology and Society 20 (1):57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diener, Ed. et al. 1997 Subjective well being. Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology.Google Scholar
  8. Durrenberger, Paul E. 1996. Gulf Coast soundings: People and policy in the Mississippi shrimp industry. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  9. El Llanquihue. 2004. Domingo, 21 de Noviembre.Google Scholar
  10. Ecoceanos News. 2002. Bajo graves acusaciones de corrupcion renuncio el subsecretario de pesca. Santiago de Chile. August 30.Google Scholar
  11. FAO. 2015–2016. Food and Agriculture Division of the United Nations. Fisheries Sector. http://www.fao.org/fi/fcp/en/CHL/profile.htm; http://www.fao.org/figis.
  12. FIS. 2017. Chilean mussel exports grow in volume and value. Fish Information Services. December: 22 http://www.fis.com/fis/worldnews/worldnews.asp?monthyear=12-2017&day=22&id=95346&l=e&country=&special=&ndb=1&df=1.
  13. Greenberg, James B. 1998. The tragedy of commoditization: Political ecology of the Colorado River Delta’s destruction. Research in Economic Anthropology 19: 133–152.Google Scholar
  14. Gunder-Frank, Andre. 1967. Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin America. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  15. Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas (INE). 2008 and 2018. Boletín de Pesca, Región de los Lagos. Santiago: Chile. http://www.aqua.cl/wpcontent/uploads/sites/3/2018/03/Bolet%C3%ADn_Los_Lagos_Diciembre_2017.pdf.
  16. Johnson, Jeffrey. 1998. Research design and research strategies. In The handbook of methods in cultural anthropology, ed. H.R. Bernard. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
  17. NOAA. 2005. Aquaculture. www.nmfs.noaa.gov/mediacenter/aquaculture. Accessed June 2005.
  18. National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC), NOAA. 2005. http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/seg/hazard/slideset/45/45_slides.shtml. Accessed June 2005.
  19. National Research Council (NRC). 1988. Fishing technologies for developing countries. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  20. OECD. 2017. OECD review of fisheries: Policies and summary statistics 2017. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/rev_fish_stat_en-2017-en.Google Scholar
  21. Ohlson, Willliam. 1996. Los impactos de las salmoneras en Chiloé. Unpublished Document. Archivos de Chiloé. Castro, Chile.Google Scholar
  22. Orbach, Michael. 1997. Hunters, seamen, and entrepeneurs: The tuna seinermen of San Diego. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  23. Outeiro, Luis, and Sebastian Villasante. 2013. Linking salmon aquaculture synergies and trade-offs on ecosystem services to human wellbeing constituents. Ambio 42 (8): 1022–1036.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Pillay, T.V.R. 1994. Aquaculture development: Progress and prospects. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc..Google Scholar
  25. Pitchon, Ana. 2011. Sea hunters or sea farmers: Transitions in Chilean fisheries. Human Organization 70 (2): 200–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pollnac, Richard B. 1997. Social and cultural characteristics of fishing peoples. Marine Behavioral Physiology 14: 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pollnac, Richard B., and John Poggie. 1982. Sociocultural aspects of implementing aquaculture systems in marine fishing communities. In Aquaculture development in less developed countries, ed. L.J. Smith and S. Peterson. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 1988. The structure of job satisfaction among New England fishermen and its application to fisheries management policy. American Anthropologist 90 (4): 888–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pollnac, Richard B., and Pricilla Weeks, eds. 1992. Coastal aquaculture in developing countries: Problems and perspectives. Kingston, R.I: University of Rhode Island, ICMRD.Google Scholar
  30. Pomeroy, Robert S. 1992. Aquaculture development: An alternative for small-scale fisherfolk in developing countries. In Coastal aquaculture in developing countries: Problems and perspectives, ed. Richard B. Pollnac and Pricilla Weeks. Kingston, R.I: University of Rhode Island, ICMRD.Google Scholar
  31. SERNAP. 2005. Servicio Nacional de Pesca. http://www.sernapesca.cl/. Accessed June 2005.
  32. Soto, Doris, Fernando Jara, and Carlos Moreno. 2001. Escaped salmon in the inner seas, southern Chile: Facing ecological and social conflicts. Ecological Applications 11 (6): 1750–1762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thu, Kendall M., and E. Paul Durrenberger, eds. 1998. Pigs, profits, and rural communities. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  34. Undercurrent News. 2015. Chile mussel exports grow in volume and value. https://www.undercurrentnews.com/2015/07/10/chile-mussel-exports-grow-in-volume-and-value/. Accessed March 2018.
  35. Warren, D.M., and B. Rajasekaran. 1993. Putting local knowledge to good use. International Agricultural Development 13 (4): 8–10.Google Scholar
  36. Wells, Miriam J. 1996. Strawberry fields: Politics, class, and work in California agriculture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  37. World Resources Institute. 2015. Earth Trends Data Tables. http://earthtrends.wri.org/datatables. Accessed August 2005 and January 2018.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyCalifornia State University Dominguez HillsCarsonUSA

Personalised recommendations