Advertisement

Responsibility As a Goal and Ethical Norm in Counseling for Sustainable Development and Decent Work in the Age of Anthropocene

  • Violetta Drabik-Podgórna
Chapter
Part of the Lifelong Learning Book Series book series (LLLB, volume 23)

Abstract

Making the idea of sustainable development a reality speaks to the commitment to invest reasonably in the future. It involves efforts that promote economic growth, preservation of natural resources and social development. The latter includes, among others, common access to lifelong education which equips people with competences they need to function successfully in today’s world and fosters individuals’ responsibility and balanced development. The achievement of these goals is furthered by guidance and counseling which support education and assist people in designing their lives. The rise of the notion of the Anthropocene in scholarship has recast the language of politics, research and art. As the place and role of humans in the world are being redefined, our responsibility for the changes we affect as a species is being highlighted, while the imperative that we collectively and individually take care of the world and leave it to the future generations as a hospitable place to live in is being touted. My chapter focuses on responsibility and shows the role of ethics in life design counseling. Helping in decision-making about the future, counseling supports clients in taking responsibility for themselves and their environments as, ethically, “the human is responsible for what he/she chooses. The human is also responsible for the shape that his/her decisions give to existence” (Popielski, K, Koncepcja logoteorii V. E. Frankla i jej znaczenie w poradnictwie psychologiczno-pastoralnym [V. E. Frankl’s logotheory and its relevance to psychological pastoral counselling]. In: Chlewiński Z (ed) Wybrane zagadnienia z psychologii pastoralnej [Selected issues in pastoral psychology]. KUL, Lublin, pp 68–102, 1998). This means that fostering responsibility in clients can be counseling’s valid goal. At the same time, responsibility for constructing social relationships demands that counselors adopt the position of dialogue and partnership. Responsibility (both formal and substitutive) can thus be identified as a principle of subject-oriented interventions in counseling.

Keywords

Responsibility Career design counseling Dialogics Anthropocene 

References

  1. Björkenheim, J., & Karvinen-Niinikoski, S. (2008). Biography, narrative and rehabilitation. European Studies on Inequalities and Social Cohesion, 1–2, 113–127.Google Scholar
  2. Buber, M. (2004). I and Thou .(R. G. Smith, Trans.). London/New York: Continuum Books.Google Scholar
  3. Chojnacka, M. A. (2011). Problem odpowiedzialności w filozofii Levinasa [The issue of responsibility in Levinas’ philosophy]. Studia z historii filozofii, 2, 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Czerkawska, A., & Czerkawski, A. (2005). Etyczny wymiar poradnictwa zawodowego [The ethical dimension of career counselling]. Warszawa, Poland: KOWEZiU.Google Scholar
  5. Domańska, E. (2008). Humanistyka nie-antropocentryczna a studia nad rzeczami [The non-anthropocentric humanities and object studies]. Kultura Współczesna, 3, 9–21.Google Scholar
  6. Drabik-Podgórna, V. (2009). Poradnictwo w perspektywie personalizmu dialogicznego [Counselling in the perspective of dialogical personalism]. In Kargulowa A. (Ed.), Poradoznawstwo – kontynuwacja dyskursu [Counsellogy: The discourse continues] (pp. 103–124). Warszawa, Poland: PWN.Google Scholar
  7. Duarte, M. E. (2014). Life-designing: Objectives, processes, instruments. Journal of Counsellogy, 3, 214–230.Google Scholar
  8. Duarte, M. E. (2017). Counselling and well-being: On the road to realities. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 3(26), 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2017.1309641 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Filek, J. (2003). Filozofia odpowiedzialności XX wieku [20th-century philosophy of responsibility]. Kraków, Poland: ZNAK.Google Scholar
  10. Frankl, V. E. (1984). Man’s search for meaning. New York/London/Toronto/Sydney: Pocket Books.Google Scholar
  11. Ganowicz-Bączyk, A. (2009). Spór o etykę środowiskową [Debate on environmental ethics]. Kraków, Poland: Wyd. WAM.Google Scholar
  12. Guichard, J. (2004). Se faire soi [Self-construction]. L’Orientation Scolaire et Professionnelle, 33(4), 499–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guichard, J. (2014, June 3). Dialogi konstruujące życie [Life-designing dialogues]. Paper delivered at a panel discussion titled Kariera w płynnej nowoczesności [Careers in liquid modernity] held at the Institute of Pedagogy, University of Wroclaw, Poland.Google Scholar
  14. Guichard, J. (2016). Life- and working-design interventions for constructing a sustainable human(e) world. Journal of Counsellogy, 5, 179–190.Google Scholar
  15. Ingarden, R. (1983). Man and value (A. Szylewicz, Trans.). München, Germany: Philosophia Verlag.Google Scholar
  16. International Labour Organization. (2001). Reducing the decent work deficit: A global challenge. International conference 89th session 2001 (Report to the Director General). Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
  17. International Labour Organization. (2008). ILO declaration on social justice for a fair globalization adopted by the International Labour Conference at its Ninety-seventh Session, Geneva, 10 June 2008. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
  18. Jonas, H. (1984) The imperative of responsibility: In search of an ethics for a technological age (H. Jonas & D. Herr, Trans.). Chicago/London: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Jones, C., Shillito-Clarke, C., Syme, G., et al. (Eds.). (2000). Questions of ethics in counselling and therapy. Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kargulowa, A. (2016). Discourses of counsellogy: Toward an anthropology of counselling. Kraków, Poland: Towarzystwo Naukowe – Societas Vistulana.Google Scholar
  21. Klimski, M. (2014). Antropocentryczna a biocentryczna koncepcja etyki środowiskowej na przykładzie ujęć Tadeusza Ślipki i Zdzisławy Piątek [The anthropocentric vs. the biocentric concept of environmental ethics: Examples of Tadeusz Ślipko and Zdzisława Piątek]. Rocznik Tomistyczny, 3, 187–203.Google Scholar
  22. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Kunicka, M. (2015). Wychowanie a etyka odpowiedzialności [Education and ethics of responsibility]. Teraźniejszość – Człowiek – Edukacja, 18(3), 59–70.Google Scholar
  24. Lazari-Pawłowska, I. (1972). Etyki zawodowe jako role społeczne [Professional ethics models as social roles]. In Sarapa, A. (Ed.), Etyka zawodowa [Professional ethics]. Warszawa, Poland: Książka i Wiedza.Google Scholar
  25. Levinas, E. (1979). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority (A. Lingis, Trans.). The Hague,The Netherlands/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhof.Google Scholar
  26. Levinas, E. (1989) Otherwise than being or beyond essence (A. Lingis, Trans.). Dordrecht, The Netherlands/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. Levinas, E. (1996). Transcendence and intelligibility. In E. Levinas, A. Peperzak, P. Crichtley, & R. Bernasconi (Eds.), Basic philosophical writings (S. Crichtley & T. Wright, Trans.). (pp. 149–159). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Niemirowski, T. (2014). Zasady i normy wspierania rozwoju człowieka. Etyka dla psychologów i pedagogów [Principles and norms of supporting human development: An ethics for psychologists and educators]. Opole, Poland: Wyd. Nauk. Scriptorium.Google Scholar
  29. Oxford Dictionary in English. Third Edition (2010). Stevenson (Ed.). Oxford Univerity Press.Google Scholar
  30. Picht, G. (2004). Pojęcie odpowiedzialności [Der Begriff der Verantwortung/The notion of responsibility] (J. Filek, Trans.). In J. Filek (Ed.), Filozofia odpowiedzialności XX wieku, Teksty źródłowe [20th-century ethics of responsibility: Source texts] (pp. 142–146). Kraków, Poland: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.Google Scholar
  31. Pope Francis. (2015). Praise be to You – Laudato Si: On care for our common home. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
  32. Popielski, K. (1989). Koncepcja logoteorii V. E. Frankla i jej znaczenie w poradnictwie psychologiczno-pastoralnym [V. E. Frankl’s logotheory and its relevance to psychological pastoral counselling]. In Z. Chlewiński (Ed.), Wybrane zagadnienia z psychologii pastoralnej [Selected issues in pastoral psychology] (pp. 68–102). Lublin, Poland: KUL.Google Scholar
  33. Pouyaud, J. (2016a). For a psychosocial approach to decent work. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 422., 32–45.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00422 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pouyaud, J. (2016b). A framework for the training and supervision of students and practicioners for the life design dialogues. In J. Guichard, V. Drabik-Podgórna, & M. Podgórny (Eds.), Counselling and dialogue for sustainable human development (pp. 185–195). Wydaw. Adam Marszałek: Toruń, Poland.Google Scholar
  35. Ricoeur, P. (2000). The concept of responsibility. In P. Ricoeur (Ed.), The Just (D. Pellauner, Trans.). (pp. 11–35). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Ryszkiewicz, M. (2015). Antropocen jako pojęcie kulturowe. Rozmowa z Marcinem Ryszkiewiczem [The Anthropocene as a cultural concept: An interview with Marcin Ryszkiewicz]. An interview conducted by Aleksandra Jach. https://theanthropoceneindex.wordpress.com/2015/12/26/antropocen-jako-pojecie-kulturowe-wywiad-z-marcinem-ryszkiewiczem/. Accessed 18 May 2017.
  37. Savickas, M. L. (2011a). Constructing careers: Actor, agent, and author. Journal of Employment Counseling, 48(4), 179–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Savickas, M. L. (2011b). Career counseling. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  39. Savickas, M. L. (2012). Life design: A paradigm for career intervention in the 21th century. Journal of Counseling & Development, 90(1), 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Savickas, M. L., Nota, L., Rossier, J., Dauwalder, J.-P., Duarte, M. E., Guichard, J., et al. (2009). Life designing: A paradigm for career construction in the 21st century. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(3), 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sidor-Rządkowska, M. (2009). Etyka coaching [Ethics of coaching]. In M. Sidor-Rządkowska (Ed.), Coaching. Teoria, praktyka, studia przypadków [Coaching: Theory, practice, case studies] (pp. 231–244). Kraków, Poland: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
  42. Ślipko, T. (1999). Ekologia między filozofią a ideologią [Ecology between philosophy and ideology]. In A. Latawiec & G. Bugajak (Eds.), Między filozofią przyrody a ekofilozofią [Between philosophy of nature and ecophilosophy] (pp. 161–188). Warszawa, Poland: Wyd. UKSW.Google Scholar
  43. Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., Gaffney, O., & Ludwig, C. (2015). The trajectory of the anthropocene: The great acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 82–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Strumińska, M. (2004). Etyka biocentryczna i antropocentryczna z perspektywy zrównoważonego rozwoju [Biocentric and anthropocentric ethics: A sustainable development perspective]. Prakseologia, 144, 169–174.Google Scholar
  45. Szewczyk, K. (1998). Wychować człowieka mądrego: zarys etyki nauczycielskiej [Educating a wise human being: An outline of ethics for teachers]. Warszawa, Poland: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Google Scholar
  46. Tischner, J. (1980). Bezdroża spotkań [The wilderness of encounters]. Analecta Cracoviensia, XII, 137.Google Scholar
  47. Tischner, J. (1983). W kręgu filozofii pracy [On the philosophy of work]. Kraków, Poland: Biblioteczka Służby Liturgicznej.Google Scholar
  48. Zalasiewicz, J., Crutzen, P., & Steffen, W. (2012). The Anthropocene. In F. M. Gradstein, J. Ogg, M. Schmitz, & G. Ogg (Eds.), The geologic time scale. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Zielińska, L. (2012). Od odpowiedzialności za siebie do współodpowiedzialności [From responsibility for oneself to mutual responsibility]. Annales, 15(1), 171–180.Google Scholar
  50. Zierkiewicz, E. (2004). Poradnik– oferta wirtualnej pomocy. Kraków, Poland: Impuls.Google Scholar
  51. Zylinska, J. (2014). Minimal ethics for the Anthropocene. Ann Arbor, MI: Open Humanities Press, University of Michigan Library. Freely available online at:  https://doi.org/10.3998/ohp.12917741.0001.001

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Violetta Drabik-Podgórna
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WrocławWroclawPoland

Personalised recommendations