Advertisement

Looking Forward: Developing a Research Agenda

  • Violetta Drabik-Podgórna
  • Marek Podgórny
Chapter
Part of the Lifelong Learning Book Series book series (LLLB, volume 23)

Abstract

The chapter explores further possible perspectives, including the development of career and life design interventions, as well as setting the horizon for further scientific research on such new solutions. The authors stress that future research projects should be interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary as well as cover a variety of interrelated normative, political, institutional, relational and methodological levels. This requires an appropriate strategy to study all these levels simultaneously. One rigorously designed and theoretically restricted perspective would in all likelihood mean acquiring only limited as well as fragmentary data and, consequently, failing to capture the totality of the image. Therefore, the chapter presents a broadly understood triangulation concept, enabling the most comprehensive take on the subject.

Keywords

Career and life design interventions Research Methodological levels Triangulation 

References

  1. Buber, M. (1992). Ja i Ty. Wybór pism filozoficznych [I and Thou]. Warszawa, Poland: PAX.Google Scholar
  2. Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
  3. Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Drabik-Podgórna, V. (2009). Poradnictwo w perspektywie personalizmu dialogicznego [Counselling in the perspective of dialogical personalism]. In A. Kargulowa (Ed.), Poradoznawstwo – kontynuwacja dyskursu [Counsellogy: The discourse continues] (pp. 103–124). Warszawa, Poland: PWN.Google Scholar
  5. Drabik-Podgórna, V. (2016). Contemporary counselling: Anthropocentric dialogue-sensitive thinking. In J. Guichard, V. Drabik-Podgórna, & M. Podgórny (Eds.), Counselling and dialogue for sustainable human development (pp. 44–55). Toruń, Poland: Wydaw. Adam Marszałek.Google Scholar
  6. Duarte, M. E. (2014). Life-designing: Objectives, processes, instruments. Journal of Counsellogy, 3, 214–230.Google Scholar
  7. Flick, U. (2017). Managing quality in qualitative research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Greco, T. H. (2001). Money: Understanding and creating alternatives to legal tender. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  10. Guichard, J. (2016a). Life- and working-design interventions for constructing a sustainable human(e) world. Journal of Counsellogy, 5, 179–190.Google Scholar
  11. Guichard, J. (2016b). Career guidance, education and dialogues for a fair and sustainable human development. In J. Guichard, V. Drabik-Podgórna, & M. Podgórny (Eds.), Counselling and dialogue for sustainable human development (pp. 17–43). Toruń, Poland: Wydaw. Adam Marszałek.Google Scholar
  12. Guichard, J., Bangali, M., Cohen Scali, V., Pouyaud, J., & Robinet, M.-L. (2017). Concevoir et orienter sa vie. Les dialogues en conseil life design. Paris: Editions Qui plus est.Google Scholar
  13. Goffman, E. (2010). Analiza ramowa. Esej z organizacji doświadczenia [Frame analysis. An essay on the organization of experience]. Kraków, Poland: NOMOS.Google Scholar
  14. International Labour Organization. (2001). Reducing the decent work deficit: A global challenge. In International conference 89th session 2001 (Report to the director general). Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
  15. International Labour Organization. (2008). ILO declaration on social justice for a fair globalization adopted by the international labour conference at its ninety-seventh session, Geneva, 10 June 2008. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
  16. Jonas, H. (1984). The imperative of responsibility: In search of an ethics for a technological age (H. Jonas & D. Herr, Trans.). Chicago/London: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kargulowa, A. (2016). Discourses of counsellogy: Toward an anthropology of counselling. Kraków, Poland: Towarzystwo Naukowe – Societas Vistulana.Google Scholar
  18. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research. Communicative action and the public sphere. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 559–603). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Lüders, C., & Reichertz, J. (1986). Wissenschaftliche Praxis ist, wenn alles funktioniert und keiner weiß warum. Bemerkungen zur Entwicklung qualitativer Sozialforschung. Sozialwissenschaftliche Literaturrundschau, 12, 90–102.Google Scholar
  20. Malewski, M. (2012). Metodologia badań społecznych – Ortodoksja i refleksyjność [Methodology of social research – Orthodoxy and reflectivity]. Teraźniejszość – Człowiek – Edukacja, 4(60), 29–46.Google Scholar
  21. Meighan, R., & Harber, C. (2007). A sociology of educating. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  22. Savickas, M. L. (2011). Career counseling. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  23. Savickas, M. L. (2012). Life designe: A paradigme for career intervention in the 21th century. Journal of Counseling & Development, 90, 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Savickas, M. L., Nota, L., Rossier, J., Dauwalder, J.-P., Duarte, M. E., Guichard, J., et al. (2009). Life designing: A paradigm for career construction in the 21st century. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(3), 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., Gaffney, O., & Ludwig, C. (2015). The trajectory of the anthropocene: The great acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 82–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Szkudlarek, T. (2005). “Koniec pracy” czy koniec zatrudnienia? Edukacja wobec presji światowego rynku [‘The End of Work’ or the end of employment? Education and the pressure of the world market] In A. Kargulowa, S. M. Kwiatkowski, & T. Szkudlarek (Eds.), T. Rynek I kultura neoliberalna a edukacja [Market and neoliberal culture versus eeducation]. Kraków, Poland: Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls.Google Scholar
  27. Tedlock, B. (2005). The observation and participation of and the emergence of public ethnography. In N. Denzin & L. Yvonna (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 151–171). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Turner, J. H. (2002). The structure of sociological theory. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co Inc 7th rev. ed.Google Scholar
  29. Zylinska, J. (2014). Minimal ethics for the anthropocene. Open Humanities Press, University of Michigan Library. Freely available online at:  https://doi.org/10.3998/ohp.12917741.0001.001

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Violetta Drabik-Podgórna
    • 1
  • Marek Podgórny
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WrocławWrocławPoland

Personalised recommendations