Advertisement

Gender and Decent Work: The Role of Occupational Stereotypes

  • Chiara AnnovazziEmail author
  • Maria Cristina Ginevra
  • Elisabetta Camussi
Chapter
Part of the Lifelong Learning Book Series book series (LLLB, volume 23)

Abstract

Although there have been many encouraging developments in gender equality over the past three decades, inequalities already persist in several forms such as gender pay gap or benevolent sexism (Glick & Fiske, J Pers Soc Psychol 70(3):491–512, 1996). Young women experience higher unemployment rates and more various career barriers than their male peers (Signorelli, Choudhry, & Marelli, Eur J Dev Res 24(3):413–433, 2012). Women suffer from a general decrease in family-friendly arrangements (Vaughan-Whitehead, Work inequalities in the crisis: Evidence from Europe. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011) which may favor work/family conflicts (Nota, Soresi, Ferrari, & Ginevra, Eur Psychol 19:248–259, 2014). Lastly, women are still significantly under-represented in the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics – STEM – fields (European Commission, She figures 2015 report. Gender in research and innovation. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016). Consequently, the International Labour Organization (Global employment trends: January 2009. Geneva, Switzerland: ILO, 2009) considers gender equality a relevant issue in its Decent Work Agenda, in order to permit both women and men to build a promising future for themselves, families and communities. Particular attention is also paid to educational and occupational choices which may be strongly influenced by stereotyped beliefs on gender roles and the labor market, discouraging young people from undertaking training or career pathways considered socially inappropriate for their gender (Eccles, Psychol Women Q 35(3):510–516, 2011). The chapter discusses the relationships between gender equality and decent work, focusing on career interventions (individual training or social engagement actions) for reducing gender stereotypes and discriminations. A three step – Awareness-Activation-Participation – new methodological approach to public engagement is applied on gender issues.

Keywords

Gender equality Occupational stereotypes Decent work Public engagement 

References

  1. Amarnani, R. V., Garcia P. R. J. M., Restubog, S. L. D., Bordia, P., & Bordia S. (2016). Do you think I’m worth it? The self-verifying role of parental engagement in career adaptability and career persistence among STEM students. Journal of Career Assessment. Advance Online Publication.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072716679925 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avery, D. R., McKay, P. F., & Wilson, D. C. (2008). What are the odds? How demographic similarity affects the prevalence of perceived employment discrimination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 235–249.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.235 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Benschop, Y., & Mieke, V. (2011). Gender change, organizational change and gender equality strategies. In E. Jeanes, D. Knights, & P. Yancey-Martin (Eds.), Handbook of gender, work and organization (pp. 277–290). London: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Berdahl, J. L., & Min, J. A. (2012). Prescriptive stereotypes and workplace consequences for East Asians in North America. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 18(2), 141–152.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027692 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biernat, M., & Kobrynowicz, D. (1997). Gender-and race-based standards of competence: Lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 544–557.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.544 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bihagen, E., & Ohls, M. (2006). The glass ceiling-where is it? Women’s and men’s career prospects in the private vs. the public sector in Sweden 1979–2000. The Sociological Review, 54(1), 20–47.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00600.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P., & Hillgren, P. A. (2010, November). Participatory design and democratizing innovation. In T. Robertson (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th biennial participatory design conference (pp. 41–50). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  9. Bobbitt-Zeher, D. (2011). Gender discrimination at work: Connecting gender stereotypes, institutional policies, and gender composition of workplace. Gender & Society, 25(6), 764–786.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243211424741 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (2016). Vocational psychology: Agency, equity, and Well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 67(1), 541–565.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033237 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (2018). Promoting adaptive career behavior. A social cognitive career theory perspective. In L. Nota & S. Soresi (Eds.), Counseling and coaching in times of crisis and transitions: From research to practice (pp. 103–112). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Bruce, A., Lyall, C., Tait, J., & Williams, R. (2004). Interdisciplinary integration in Europe: The case of the Fifth Framework programme. Futures, 36(4), 457–470.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burnham, L., & Theodore, N. (2012). Home economics: The invisible and unregulated world of domestic work. New York: National Domestic Workers Alliance.Google Scholar
  14. Busch, A., & Holst, E. (2011). Gender-specific occupational segregation, glass ceiling effects, and earnings in managerial positions: Results of a fixed effects model. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1750260
  15. Camussi, E., & Annovazzi C. (2016) A proposito di (im)pari opportunità tra uomini e donne: la questione del “Gender Pay Gap” [About (un)equal opportunities between men and women: The “Gender Pay Gap” issue. In A. Quadrio & D. Pajardi (Eds.), La società ri-pensata [The re-thought society] (pp. 41–60). Milano: EDRA.Google Scholar
  16. Camussi, E., Annovazzi, C., Montali, L., & Ginevra, M. C. (2017). Gender-sensitive career counseling: An innovative approach. In L. Nota & S. Soresi (Eds.), Counseling and coaching in times of crisis and transitions: From research to practice. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Charlesworth, S. (2010). The Sex Discrimination Act: Advancing gender equality and decent work? In M. Thornton (Ed.), Sex discrimination in uncertain times (pp. 133–152). Canberra, Australia: ANU E Press.Google Scholar
  18. Connell, R. (2006). The experience of gender change in public sector organizations. Gender, Work & Organization, 13(5), 435–452.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2006.00316.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585–609.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb01049.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eccles, J. S. (2011). Understanding women’s achievement choices looking back and looking forward. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35(3), 510–516.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684311414829 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ely, R. J., & Meyerson, D. E. (2000). Theories of gender in organizations: A new approach to organizational analysis and change. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 103–151.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22004-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. European Commission. (2016). She figures 2015 report. Gender in research and innovation. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  23. European Institute for Gender Equality-EIGE. (2015). Gender equality index: Measuring gender equality in the European Union 2005–2012. Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  24. EUROSTAT – Statistical Office of the European Communities. (2015). Regional statistics: Reference guide. Luxembourg: Eurostat.Google Scholar
  25. Ferrari, L., Sgaramella, T. M., & Soresi, S. (2015). Bridging disability and work: Contribution and challenges of life design. In L. Nota & J. Rossier (Eds.), Life design handbook. From practice to theory and from theory to practice (pp. 219–232). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  26. Fouad, N. A., Singh, R., Cappaert, K., Chang, W.-h., & Wan, M. (2016). Comparison of women engineers who persist in or depart from engineering. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92, 79–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ginevra, M. C., Di Maggio, I., Nota, L., & Soresi, S. (2017). Stimulating resources to cope with challenging times and new realities: Effectiveness of a career intervention. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance. Special Issue: Inducing and Measuring Change in Vocational Guidance and Career Counselling Interventions, 17, 77–96.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-016-9331-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Glass, J. (2004). Blessing or curse? Work-family policies and mother’s wage growth over time. Work and Occupations, 31(3), 367–394.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888404266364 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gottfredson, L. S. (2006). Circumscription and compromise. In J. H. Greenhaus (Ed.), Encyclopedia of career development (pp. 85–148). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Grant, R. M. (2010). Contemporary strategy analysis. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. Heilman, M., & Caleo, S. (2015). Gender discrimination in the workplace. In A. Collela & E. King (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of discrimination at work. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 416–427.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.416 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. International Labour Organization. (2009). Global employment trends: January 2009. Geneva, Switzerland: ILO.Google Scholar
  35. International Labour Organization. (2012). ILO global estimate of forced labour 2012: Results and methodology. Geneva, Switzerland: ILO.Google Scholar
  36. Isaac, C., Lee, B., & Carnes, M. (2009). Interventions that affect gender bias in hiring: A systematic review. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 84(10), 1440–1446.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b6ba00 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Joshi, A., Son, J., & Roh, H. (2015). When can women close the gap? A meta-analytic test of sex differences in performance and rewards. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1516–1545.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0721 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jöstl, G., Bergsmann, E., Lüftenegger, M., Schober, B., & Spiel, C. (2012). When will they blow my cover? Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie, 220, 109–120.  https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Koch, A. J., D’Mello, S. D., & Sackett, P. R. (2015). A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 128–161.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036734 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Koen, J., Klehe, U.-C., & Van Vianen, A. E. M. (2012). Training career adaptability to facilitate a successful school-to-work transition. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81, 395–408.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2013). Social cognitive model of career self-management: Toward a unifying view of adaptive career behavior across the life span. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(4), 557–568.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033446 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Brenner, B., Chopra, S. B., Davis, T., Talleyrand, R., & Suthakaran, V. (2001). The role of contextual supports and barriers in the choice of math/science educational options: A test of social cognitive hypotheses. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 474–483.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.48.4.474 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(1), 36–49.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.47.1.36 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lent, R. W., Lopez, A. M., Lopez, F. G., & Sheu, H.-B. (2008). Social cognitive career theory and the prediction of interests and choice goals in the computing disciplines. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 52–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McDonald, S., Lin, N., & Ao, D. (2009). Networks of opportunity: Gender, race, and job leads. Social Problems, 56, 385–402.  https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2009.56.3.385 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Neureiter, M., & Traut-Mattausch, E. (2017). Two sides of the career resources coin: Career adaptability resources and the impostor phenomenon. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 98, 56–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Newman, C., Ng, C., & Pacqué-Margolis, S. (2012). Strengthening the health worker pipeline through gender-transformative strategies. Washington, DC: CapacityPlus/IntraHealth International.Google Scholar
  49. Nota, L., Soresi, S., Ferrari, L., & Ginevra, M. C. (2014). Vocational designing and career counseling in Europe. European Psychologist, 19, 248–259.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000189 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. OECD, ILO, IMF, & World Bank. (2014). Achieving stronger growth by promoting a more gender balanced economy. Report prepared for the G20 Labour and Employment Ministerial Meeting Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/g20/topics/employment-and-social-policy/ILO-IMF-OECD-WBG-Achieving-stronger-growth-by-promoting-a-more-gender-balanced-economy-G20.pdf
  51. Olivero, O. A. (2013). Interdisciplinary mentoring in science: Strategies for success. Oxford, UK: Academic.Google Scholar
  52. Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Senach, B., & Scapin, D. (2010). Living lab research landscape: From user centred design and user experience towards user cocreation. Retrieved from https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00612632/document
  53. Perry, E. L., Davis-Blake, A., & Kulik, C. T. (1994). Explaining gender-based selection decisions: A synthesis of contextual and cognitive approaches. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 786–820.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1994.9412190219 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pissarides, C., Garibaldi, P., Olivetti, C., Petrongolo, B., & Wasmer, E. (2005). Women in the labor force: How well is Europe doing? Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Pouyaud, J. (2015). Vocational trajectories and people’s multiple identities: A life design. In L. Nota & J. Rossier (Eds.), Handbook of life design: From practice to theory and from theory to practice (pp. 59–74). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  56. Richard, G. T., Kafai, Y. B., Adleberg, B., & Telhan, O. (2015, February). StitchFest: Diversifying a College Hackathon to broaden participation and perceptions in computing. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 114–119). ACM.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2676723.2677310
  57. Rossier, J. (2015). Career adaptability and life designing. In L. Nota & J. Rossier (Eds.), Handbook of life design: From practice to theory and from theory to practice (pp. 153–167). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  58. Savickas, M. L. (2015). Life design with adults – developmental individualization using biographical bricolage. In L. Nota & J. Rossier (Eds.), Handbook of life design: From practice to theory and from theory to practice (pp. 135–149). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  59. Signorelli, M., Choudhry, M., & Marelli, E. (2012). The impact of financial crises on female labour. The European Journal of Development Research, 24(3), 413–433.  https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2012.3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56(4), 319–331.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.56.4.319 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stamarski, C. S., & Son Hing, L. S. (2015). Gender inequalities in the workplace: The effects of organizational structures, processes, practices, and decision makers’ sexism. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 6–20.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01400 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Swanson, J. L., & Woitke, M. B. (1997). Theory into practice in career assessment for women: Assessment and interventions regarding perceived career barriers. Journal of Career Assessment, 5, 443–462.  https://doi.org/10.1177/106907279700500405 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tesfaye, Y. (2011, November). The effect of discrimination on job performance and job satisfaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Wolverhampton Business School, University of Wolverhampton.Google Scholar
  64. Tien, H.-L. S. (2015). Cultural perspectives on life design. In L. Nota & J. Rossier (Eds.), Handbook of life design: From practice to theory and from theory to practice (pp. 249–267). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  65. Van Esbroeck, R., & Augustijnen, M.-T. (2015). Coaching – A career intervention model within life design. In L. Nota & J. Rossier (Eds.), Handbook of life design: From practice to theory and from theory to practice (pp. 169–181). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  66. Vanek, J., Chen, M. A., Carré, F., Heintz, J., & Hussmanns, R. (2014). Statistics on the informal economy: Definitions, regional estimates & challenges. Retrieved from http://www.wiego.org/sites/default/files/publications/files/Vanek-Statistics-WIEGO-WP2.pdf
  67. Vaughan-Whitehead, D. (Ed.). (2011). Work inequalities in the crisis: Evidence from Europe. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  68. Vergauwe, J., Wille, B., Feys, M., De Fruyt, F., & Anseel, F. (2015). Fear of being exposed: The trait-relatedness of the impostor phenomenon and its relevance in the work context. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30, 565–581.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-014-9382-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. World Economic Forum. (2016). The global gender gap report 2016. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
  70. Young, R. A., & Collin, A. (2004). Introduction: Constructivism and social constructionism in the career field. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(3), 373–388.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2003.12.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chiara Annovazzi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maria Cristina Ginevra
    • 1
  • Elisabetta Camussi
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Milano-BicoccaMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations