Advertisement

Bye Bye Bartleby and Hello Seeing, or On the Silence and the Actualization to Do … Not

  • Kristof K. P. Vanhoutte
Chapter

Abstract

Herman Melvelle’s fictional character Bartleby, the New York scrivener who had the deadly habit of answering every question he received with the solemn “I would prefer not to,” has become one of the central paradigms of political philosophy. José Saramago’s novel Seeing has, recently, been portrayed as reiterating a similar political plotline. This chapter, by means of a comparative investigation of the activity performed by Melville’s scrivener and Saramago’s mostly nameless population of the (former) capital, and the interplay between silence and vocality in both tales, intends to demonstrate that this comparison is inaccurate. Saramago’s novel is not about (passive) resistance like Bartleby. Seeing, on the contrary, is a true heretical tale in the “original” meaning of the word airesis.

Keywords

José Saramago Herman Melville Bartleby Resistance Heresy Daniele Giglioli 

Works Cited

  1. Agamben, Giorgio. 1993. The Coming Community. Trans. Michael Hardt. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 1999. Bartleby, or On Contingency. In Potentialities. Collected Essays in Philosophy, 243–271, ed. and trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Arendt, Hannah. 1990. On Revolution. London/New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  4. Badiou, Alain. 2014. Ahmed the Philosopher. 34 Short Plays for Children and Everyone Else. Trans. Joseph Litvak. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Blanchot, Maurice. 1995. The Writing of the Disaster. Trans. Ann Smock. Lincoln/London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  6. Deleuze, Gilles. 1995. Negotiations 1972–1990. Trans. Martin Joughin. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 1997. Bartleby; Or, The Formula. In Essays Critical and Clinical, 68–90, trans. Daniel W. Smith and Michael A. Greco. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  8. Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1994. What Is Philosophy? Trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Graham Burchell. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Derrida, Jacques. 1998. Resistances of Psychoanalysis. Trans. Peggy Kamuf, Pascale Anne Brault and Michael Naas. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Giglioli, Daniele. 2015. Stato di minorità. Rome/Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
  11. Gilmore, Michael T. 1988. American Romanticism and the Marketplace. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Greenberg, Jonathan D. 2012. Occupy Wall Street’s Debt to Melville. The Atlantic, April 30. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/04/occupy-wall-streets-debt-to-melville/256482/. Accessed 5 Dec 2017.
  13. Han, Byung-Chul. 2017. Psychopolitics: Neoliberalism and New Technologies of Power. Trans. Erik Butler. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  14. Homer. 2007. The Iliad. Trans. Ian Johnston. Arlington: Richer Resources Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Hutcheson, Derek S. 2004. Disengage or Disenchanted? The Vote ‘against all’ in Post-communist Russia. The Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 20 (1): 98–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jacobson, Christine. 2012 ‘Against All’: Protest Voting in Post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan. Vestnik, The Journal of Russian and Asian Studies http://www.sras.org/against_all_protest_voting_in_post-soviet_kyrgyzstan. Accessed 29 Nov 2017.
  17. Jones, James F., Jr. 1998. Camus on Kafka and Melville: An Unpublished Letter. The French Review 71 (4): 645–650.Google Scholar
  18. Melville, Herman. 2002. Bartleby, The Scrivener: A story of Wall Street. In Melville’s Short Novels, ed. Dan McCall, 3–34. New York/London: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  19. Newman, Saul. 2010. The Politics of Postanarchism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pedot, Richard. 2014. Ah, Bartleby! Ah, philosophie! Une rencontre critique. Toulouse: Presses Universitaires du Mirail.Google Scholar
  21. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1997. In The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, ed. Victor Gourevitch. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Silver, Allan. 1981. The Lawyer and the Scrivener. Partisan Review 48 (3): 409–424.Google Scholar
  23. Sim, Stuart. 2007. Manifesto for Silence. Confronting the Politics and Culture of Noise. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Sontag, Susan. 1969. Styles of Radical Will. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
  25. Vanhoutte, Kristof K.P. 2013. Only the Country of the Blind Will Have a King. On Žižek’s Non-lucid Reading of Saramago’s Essay on Lucidity [Seeing]. International Journal of Žižek Studies 7 (4): 1–14.Google Scholar
  26. ———. 2014. I Shall Vote – Thou Shall not Govern. A Tale of Political Heresy. In Challenges to Democratic Participation. Antipolitics, Deliberative Democracy, and Pluralism, ed. Andre Santos Campos and José Gomes André, 3–14. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  27. Weil, Simone. 2013. On the Abolition of all Political Parties. Trans. Simon Leys. Collingwood: Black Inc.Google Scholar
  28. Žižek, Slavoj. 2006. The Parallax View. Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. ———. 2008. Violence: Six Sideway Reflections. New York: Picador.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristof K. P. Vanhoutte
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of the Free StateBloemfonteinSouth Africa
  2. 2.Pontifical University AntonianumRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations