Introduction: Towards an Interdisciplinary Understanding of Language Aptitude

  • Victoria AmeringerEmail author
  • Luke Green
  • Daniel Leisser
  • Sabrina Turker
Part of the English Language Education book series (ELED, volume 16)


This book represents a collection of quantitative studies on language aptitude in the context of psychology, the language sciences, and cognitive neuroscience. Throughout this book the authors bring together interdisciplinary approaches to language aptitude and its constituents in order to both inspire researchers and contribute to the testing of a new language aptitude test. This is because the authors are part of a teaching and research initiative by the editor, Susanne Maria Reiterer, embedded into the unit of language learning and teaching research (Sprachlehr- und –Lernforschung, SLLF), an interdisciplinary sub-unit affiliated with the linguistics department and the centre for teacher education at the University of Vienna. This research initiative uses a heuristic, exploratory bottom-up approach, as the ideas of the mixed group of young and senior investigators regarding new approaches on language aptitude research form the basis of this book. Some of the authors are part of the “aptitude and multilinguality” group which is currently initiating and exploring a new multilingual aptitude (MULT/AP) test that was developed by Markus Christiner and Susanne Reiterer at the University of Vienna (Christiner & Reiterer, 2017). The MULT/AP test measures phonetic aptitude and aims at identifying factors influencing it, such as cognitive abilities, musicality, gender, and age. Hence, this book is a product of the joint effort of language aptitude researchers who aim at exploring language aptitude’s multiple components, inspire Europe-wide research, and support the development of a novel language aptitude test.


  1. Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2008). The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in second language acquisition, 30(4), 481–509. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Artieda, G., & Muñoz, C. (2016). The LLAMA tests and the underlying structure of language aptitude at two levels of foreign language proficiency. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 42–48. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baddeley, A. (2003a). Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 829–839. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baddeley, A. (2003b). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36(3), 189–208. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baddeley, A. (2017). Modularity, working memory and language acquisition. Second Language Research, 33(3). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biedroń, A. (2012). Memory abilities in gifted foreign language learners. In New perspectives on individual differences in language learning and teaching (pp. 77–95). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biedroń, A. (2015). Neurology of foreign language aptitude. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 5(1), 13–40. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Biedroń, A., & Pawlak, M. (2016a). New conceptualizations of linguistic giftedness. Language Teaching, 49(2), 151–185. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Biedroń, A., & Pawlak, M. (2016b). The interface between research on individual difference variables and teaching practice: The case of cognitive factors and personality. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(3), 395–422. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carroll, J. B. (1958). A factor analysis of two foreign language aptitude batteries. The Journal of General Psychology, 59(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carroll, J. B. (1962). The prediction of success in intensive foreign language training. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Training research and education (pp. 87–136). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  12. Carroll, J. B. (1973). Implications of aptitude test research and psycholinguistic theory for foreign language teaching. Linguistics, 11(112), 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carroll, J. B. (1989). The Carroll model: A 25-Year retrospective and prospective view. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 26–31 Retrieved from CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carroll, J. B. (1990). Cognitive abilities in foreign language aptitude: Then and now. In T. Perry & C. Stansfield (Eds.), Language aptitude reconsidered (pp. 11–29). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. (1959). Modern language aptitude test. Bethesda, MD: Second Language Testing.Google Scholar
  16. Christiner, M., & Reiterer, S. M. (2017). MULT/AP Multilingual aptitude test. Vienna: Christiner questionnaires. Retrieved from Google Scholar
  17. Christiner, M., Rüdegger, S., & Reiterer, S. M. (2018). Sing Chinese and tap Tagalog? Predicting individual differences in musical and phonetic aptitude using language families differing by sound typology. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Dörnyei, Z. (2006). Individual differences in second language acquisition. AILA Review, 19(1), 42–68. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ellis, N. C., & Sinclair, S. G. (1996). Working memory in the acquisition of vocabulary and syntax: Putting language in good order. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49(1), 234–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gagné, F. (1995). From giftedness to talent: A developmental model and its impact on the language of the field. Roeper Review, 18(2), 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gagné, F. (2005). From gifts to talents: The DMGT as a developmental model. In J. E. Davidson & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 98–119). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Granena, G. (2013). Cognitive aptitudes for second language learning and the LLAMA Language Aptitude Test. In G. Granena & M. Long (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp. 105–130). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grigornko, E. L., Sternberg, R. J., & Ehrman, M. E. (2000). A theory‐based approach to the measurement of foreign language learning ability: The Canal‐F theory and test. The Modern Language Journal, 84(3), 390–405. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hu, X., Ackermann, H., Martin, J. A., Erb, M., Winkler, S., & Reiterer, S. (2013). Language aptitude for pronunciation in advanced second language (L2) learners: Behavioural predictors and neural substrates. Brain & Language, 127, 366–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jacquemot, C., & Scott, S. K. (2006). What is the relationship between phonological short-term memory and speech processing? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(11), 480–486. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jessner, U. (2006). Linguistic awareness in multilinguals: English as a third language. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jessner, U. (2014). On multilingual awareness or why the multilingual learner is a specific language learner. In Essential topics in applied linguistics and multilingualism (pp. 175–184). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kepinska, O., de Rover, M., Caspers, J., & Schiller, N. O. (2017). On neural correlates of individual differences in novel grammar learning: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 98, 156–168. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kocić, A. (2010). The effects of aptitude on language learning. Komunikacija I Kultura Online: Godina I, Broj, 1(1), 234–243.Google Scholar
  31. Kormos, J. (2013). New conceptualizations of language aptitude in second language attainment. In G. Granena & M. Long (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude and ultimate attainment (pp. 131–152). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kormos, J., & Sáfár, A. (2008). Phonological short-term memory, working memory and foreign language performance in intensive language learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(2), 261–271. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Language Learning and Testing Foundation. (2014). Language Aptitude Tests. Retrieved from
  34. Li, S. (2015). The associations between language aptitude and second language grammar acquisition: A meta-analytic review of five decades of research. Applied Linguistics, 36(3). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Li, S. (2016). The construct validity of language aptitude. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(4). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Linck, J. A., Hughes, M. M., Campbell, S. G., Silbert, N. H., Tare, M., Jackson, S. R., et al. (2013). Hi-LAB: A new measure of aptitude for high-level language proficiency. Language Learning, 63(3), 530–566. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meara, P. (2005). LLAMA language aptitude tests: The manual. Swansea, UK: Lognostics.Google Scholar
  38. Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In A. F. Healy & L. E. Bourne (Eds.), Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 339–364). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  39. Neufeld, G. G. (1979). Towards a theory of language learning ability. Language Learning, 29(2), 227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Parry, T. S., & Child, J. R. (1990). Preliminary investigation of the relationship between VORD, MLAT and language proficiency. DOCUMENT RESUME, 36.Google Scholar
  41. Petersen, C. R., & Al-Haik, A. R. (1976). The development of the defense language aptitude battery (Dlab). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 36(2), 369–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pimsleur, P. (1966). Pimsleur Language Aptitude Battery (form S). New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, Incorporated.Google Scholar
  43. Robinson, P. (2001). Individual differences, cognitive abilities, aptitude complexes and learning conditions in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 17(4), 368–392. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Robinson, P. (2002). Effects of individual differences in intelligence, aptitude, and working memory on adult incidental SLA: A replication and extension of Reber, Walkenfield and Hernstad (1991). In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 211–265). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Robinson, P. (2005). Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 46–73. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Robinson, P. (2007). Aptitudes, abilities, contexts, and practice. Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Robinson, P. (2012). Individual differences, aptitude complexes, SLA processes, and aptitude test development. In New perspectives on individual differences in language learning and teaching (pp. 57–75). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rogers, V., Barnett-Legh, T., Curry, C., & Davey, E. (2015). Validating the LLAMA aptitude tests. York, UK: EUROSLA 2015.Google Scholar
  49. Rysiewicz, J. (2008). Measuring foreign language learning aptitude. Polish adaptation of the Modern Language Aptitude Test by Carroll and Sapon. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 44(4), 569–595. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sáfár, A., & Kormos, J. (2008). Revisiting problems with foreign language aptitude. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 46(2).
  51. Sawyer, M., & Ranta, L. (2001). Aptitude, individual differences, and instructional design. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 319–353). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Seither-Preisler, A., Parncutt, R., & Schneider, P. (2014). Size and synchronization of auditory cortex promotes musical, literacy, and attentional skills in children. Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 10937–10949. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Singleton, D. (2017). Language aptitude: Desirable trait or acquirable attribute? Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 89-103. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Skehan, P. (1986). Where does language aptitude come from? Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse.Google Scholar
  55. Skehan, P. (1991). Individual differences in second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(2), 275–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Skehan, P. (2002). Theorising and updating aptitude. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 69–95). Amsterdam/New York: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Spolsky, B. (1995). Prognostication and language aptitude testing, 1925–62. Language Testing, 12(3), 321–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stansfield, C. W., & Reed, D. J. (2004). The story behind the modern language aptitude test: An interview with John B. Carroll (1916–2003). Language Assessment Quarterly: An International Journal, 1(1), 43–56. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stern, E., & Neubauer, A. (2013). Lernen macht intelligent: Warum Begabung gefördert werden muss. München, Germany: DVA.Google Scholar
  60. Van den Noort, M. W., Bosch, P., & Hugdahl, K. (2006). Foreign language proficiency and working memory capacity. European Psychologist, 11(4), 289–296. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wen, Z., & Skehan, P. (2011). A new perspective on foreign language aptitude research: Building and supporting a case for “working memory as language aptitude”. Ilha Do Desterro: A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies, 60, 015–044.Google Scholar
  62. Wen, Z. (2012). Foreign language aptitude. ELT Journal, 66(2), 233–235. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wen, Z. (2016). Working memory and second language learning: Towards an integrated approach. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wen, Z., Skehan, P., & Biedroń, A. (2017). Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Language Teaching, 50(1), 1–31. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Winke, P. (2013). An investigation into second language aptitude for advanced Chinese language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 97(1), 109–130. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Yalçın, Ş., & Spada, N. (2016). Language aptitude and grammatical difficulty. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(02), 239–263. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victoria Ameringer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Luke Green
    • 2
  • Daniel Leisser
    • 3
  • Sabrina Turker
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Linguistics & Department of English and American StudiesUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
  2. 2.Department of English and American StudiesUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
  3. 3.Department of Linguistics and Centre for Teacher Education, Unit for Language Learning and Teaching ResearchUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations