Advertisement

Transactions Among Friends

  • Wesley Mendes-Da-Silva
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter addresses the inclusion of human behavioral aspects and implications of cognitive psychology and anthropology in decisions relating to the field of behavioral finance. It offers a broad literature review toward identifying opportunities for financial innovations that are based on the notion of friendship. This chapter also presents and discusses empirical results from two evidence-based studies, referencing 400 questionnaires answered by young adults. Principal results suggest that individuals assume different behaviors in transactions among friends rather than among strangers—friends agree about the price attributed to an asset, while strangers show the propensity to bargain. In addition, agents acting on behalf of a friend appear to devote more enforcement, even if they are not receiving any reward or are being monitored.

Keywords

Trust Friendship Social networks Decision-making Financial decisions 

JEL Code

C91 L14 D23 

References

  1. Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2007). A theory of friendly boards. Journal of Finance, 62(1), 217–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Austin, W. (1980). Friendship and fairness: Effects of type of relationship and task performance on choice of distribution rules. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 402–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Austin, W., & McGinn, N. C. (1977). Sex differences in choice of distribution rules. Journal of Personality, 45, 379–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker, W. E. (1984). Floor trading and crowd dynamics. In P. Adler & P. Adler (Eds.), The social dynamics of financial markets (pp. 107–128). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  5. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Boulding, K. E. (1973). The economy of love and fear. Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  7. Canary, D. J., Cupach, W. R., & Messman, S. J. (1995). Relationship conflict: Conflict in parent-child, friendship, and work relationships. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Carroll J. S., Bazerman, M. H., & Maury, R. (1988). Negotiator cognitions: A descriptive approach to negotiators’ understanding of their opponents. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41(3), 352–370.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(88)90034-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Castanzias, R. P., & Helfat, C. E. (1991). Managerial resources and rents. Journal of Management, 17, 12–24.Google Scholar
  10. Coleman, J. S. (1990). The foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cummings, L. L., & Anton, R. (1990). The logical and appreciative dimensions of accountability. In S. Srivastra & D. L. Cooperider (Eds.), The functioning of executive appreciation (pp. 247–437). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  12. Demir, M., Haynes, A., & Potts, S. K. (2017). My friends are my estate: Friendship experiences mediate the relationship between perceived responses to capitalization attempts and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(4), 1161–1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elmer, T., Boda, Z., & Stadtfeld, C. (2017). The co-evolution of emotional well-being with weak and strong friendship ties. Network Science, 5(3), 278–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  15. Fracassi, C. (2017). Corporate finance policies and social networks. Management Science, 63(8), 2420–2438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fracassi, C., & Tate, G. (2012). External networking and internal firm governance. Journal of Finance, 67(1), 153–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Franken, A., Keijsers, L., Dijkstra, J. K., & ter Bogt, T. (2017). Music preferences, friendship, and externalizing behavior in early adolescence: A SIENA examination of the music marker theory using the SNARE study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 1839–1850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fry, W. R., Firestone, I. J., & Williams, D. L. (1983). Negotiation process and outcome of stranger dyads and dating couples: Do lovers lose? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 4(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Granovetter, M. (1974). Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Greenhalgh, L., & Chapman, D. (1994). Characteristics of relationships between disputants: Impact and empirical assessment. Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
  21. Hällsten, M., Edling, C., Rydgren, J. (2017). Social capital, friendship networks, and youth unemployment. Social Science Research, 61, 234–250.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.06.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Halpern, J. J. (1992). The effect of friendship on bargaining: Experimental studies of personal business transactions. In J. L. Wall & L. R. Jauch (Eds.), Best paper proceedings (pp. 64–68). Las Vegas: Academy of Management.Google Scholar
  23. Halpern, J. J. (1994). The effect of friendship on personal business transactions. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 38(4), 647–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Halpern, J. J. (1997). Elements of a script for friendship in transactions. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61(6), 835–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hellmann, T., & Thiele, V. (2015). Friends or foes? The interrelationship between angel and venture capital markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 115(3), 639–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hennart, J. F. (2015). Leveraging Asian institutions to deepen theory: A transaction cost perspective on relational governance. Asian Business & Management, 14(4), 257–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hirschman, A. O. (1986). Rival views of market society. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  28. Husted, B. (1990). Interorganizational trust (Unpublished dissertation, University of California, Berkeley).Google Scholar
  29. Iannone, N. E., McCarty, M. K., & Kelly, J. R. (2017). With a little help from your friend: Transactive memory in best friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34, 812–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kelley, H. H. (1979). Personal relationships: Their structures and processes. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  32. Krackhardt, D., & Stern, R. N. (1988). Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(2), 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Labun, A., Wittek, R., Steglich, C. (2016). The co-evolution of power and friendship networks in an organization. Network Science, 4(3), 364–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liang, Y., Lv, W., Wu, W., Xu, K. (2017). Friendship-aware task planning in mobile crowdsourcing. Frontiers of Information Technology and Electronic Engineering, 18(1), 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Loewenstein, G. F., Thomson, L., & Bazerman, N. H. (1989). Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(3), 426–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lu, D., Sang, J., Chen, Z., Xu, M., & Mei, T. (2017). Who are your “Real” friends: Analyzing and distinguishing between offline and online friendships from social multimedia data. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 19, 1299–1313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Malinowski, B. (1926). Crimeny Costumbre en la Sociedad Salvage. Barcelona: Editora Ariel.Google Scholar
  38. Mauss, M. (1969). The gifts: Forms and functions of exchange in Archaic societies. London: Cohen & West.Google Scholar
  39. McNeil, I. R. (1974). The many futures of contracts. Southern California Law Review, 47, 691–816.Google Scholar
  40. McNeil, I. R. (1986). Exchange revisited: Individual utility and social solidary. Ethnics, 96, 567–593.Google Scholar
  41. Mendes-Da-Silva, W. (2011). Small worlds and board interlocking in Brazil: A longitudinal study of corporate networks, 1997–2007. Brazilian Review of Finance, 9(4), 521–548.Google Scholar
  42. Mendes-Da-Silva, W., Brito, T., Famá, R., & Liljegren, J. T. (2008). Effects of friendship in transactions in an emerging market: Empirical evidence from Brazil. Icfai Journal of Behavioral Finance, 5, 25–46.Google Scholar
  43. Mendes-Da-Silva, W., Rossoni, L., Conte, B.S., Gattaz, C.C. (2016). Journal of Cultural Economics, 40(1), 75–99.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-015-9248-3
  44. Meuwese, R., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Güroğlu, B. (2017). Friends in high places: A dyadic perspective on peer status as predictor of friendship quality and the mediating role of empathy and prosocial behavior. Social Development, 26(3), 503–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Morgan, W. R., & Sawyer, J. (1967). Bargaining, expectations and the preference of equality over equity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  47. Plummer, D.L., Stone, R.T., Powell, L., Allison, J. (2016). Patterns of adult cross-racial friendships: A context for understanding contemporary race relations. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 22(4), 479–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Powell, J. H. (2017). Financial innovation: A world in transition. In 41st Annual Central Banking Seminar, Sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York. Available at: https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/powell20171018a.htm.
  49. Raiffa, H. (1982). The art and science of negotiation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press/Belknap.Google Scholar
  50. Qin, Z., & Deng, X. (2016). Government and family Guanxi in Chinese private firms: Perceptions and preference. Review of Managerial Science, 10(1), 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ramirez-Fernandez, J., Ramirez-Marin, J. Y., & Munduate, L. (2017). I expected more from you: The influence of close relationships and perspective taking on negotiation offers. Group Decision and Negotiation.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-017-9548-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rousseau, D. M., & Mclean Parks, J. (1992). The contracts of individuals and organizations. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 1–43). Greenwich: JAI.Google Scholar
  53. Rubin, Z. (1973). Liking and loving. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Wiston.Google Scholar
  54. Sahlins, M. (1972). Stone age economics. Chicago: Aldine Atherton.Google Scholar
  55. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans and understanding. Hilsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  56. Schuster, C. (2015). Your family and friends are collateral: Microfinance and the social. Theorizing the Contemporary, Cultural Anthropology website, March 30. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/660-your-family-andfriends-are-collateral-microfinance-and-the-social.
  57. Schuster, C., & Copeland, M. (1996). Global business: Planning for sales and negotiations. Fort Worth: Dryden.Google Scholar
  58. Seabright, M. D., Levinthal, D., & Fichman, M. (1992). Role of individual attachments in the dissolution of interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 122–160.Google Scholar
  59. Shapiro, E. G. (1975). Effects of expectations of future interactions on reward allocation in dyads: Equity or equality? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 873–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shefrin, H. (2015). The behavioral paradigm shift. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 55(1), 95–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Taylor, R. J., Mouzon, D.M., Nguyen, A.W., Chatters, L.M. (2016). Reciprocal family, friendship and church support networks of African Americans: Findings from the national survey of American life. Race and Social Problems, 8(4), 326–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thaler, R. H. (1985). Using mental accounting in a theory of purchasing behavior. Marketing Science, 4, 12–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Thaler, R. H. (1999). The end of behavioral finance. Financial Analyst Journal, 55(6), 12–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Turan, S. S. (2015). Stakeholders in equity-based crowdfunding: Respective risks over the equity crowdfunding lifecycle. Journal of Financial Innovation, 1(2).  https://doi.org/10.15194/jofi_2015.v1.i2.34.
  65. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty heuristics and biases. Sciences, 185, 1124–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institution of capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  67. Zand, D. E. (1972). Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wesley Mendes-Da-Silva
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Sao Paulo School of Business Administration (FGV/EAESP)Sao PauloBrazil
  2. 2.University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations