Advertisement

‘I’ve got to go somewhere’: Queer Displacement in Northern Central America and Southern Mexico

  • Ailsa Winton
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter seeks to understand the complex, damaging contexts that provoke increasing numbers of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and queer population in northern Central America to flee their homes. Through personal accounts of queer mobility in the region, displacement is analysed not as a one-off or exceptional event, but as a constantly shifting process (moving out of place) and condition (being out of place). Queer mobility is seen here in terms of the quest for placement, rather than as movement per se. Continuous negotiations to stay put, to make a place for oneself, were based in disadvantage which often resulted in complex displacements. Displacement in these terms is an intrinsic part of marginal queer experience. While the ruptures associated with these displacements can cause damage, so they can disrupt established oppressions and allow room to re-accommodate one’s personal social location. Yet, since this re-accommodation is the result of complex constellations of marginalised existence, it is fragile, and hard-won gains can be short-lived. In particular, the intersection between gender and sexual transgression, economic and social marginalization, and rampant organized and targeted hate violence all translate into pervasive precarity. The gravity and complexity of the experiences shared here highlight the need to ensure that the growing body of work on queer migration and asylum does not overshadow other spatial and temporal scales of displacement which are a crucial dynamic of the relationship between queer mobility and survival.

Keywords

LGBTQ mobility Violence-based displacement Northern Central America 

References

  1. Anderson, B., & McFarlane, C. (2011). Assemblage and geography. Area, 43(2), 124–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakewell, O. (2008). Research beyond the categories: The importance of policy irrelevant research into forced migration. Journal of Refugee Studies, 21(4), 432–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakewell, O. (2011). Conceptualising displacement and migration: Processes, conditions, and categories. In K. Koser & S. Martin (Eds.), The migration-displacement nexus: Patterns, processes, and policies (Vol. 32, pp. 14–28). Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  4. Betts, A. (2010). Survival migration: A new protection framework. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 16(3), 361–382.Google Scholar
  5. Cantú, L. (2003). A place called home: A queer political economy of Mexican immigration. In M. C. Gutmann, F. V. Matos Rodríguez, L. Stephen, & P. Zavella (Eds.), Perspectives on Las Américas: A reader in culture, history and representation (pp. 259–273). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cantú, L. (2009). The sexuality of migration: Border crossings and Mexican immigrant men. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cresswell, T. (2006). The right to mobility: the production of mobility in the courtroom. Antipode, 38(4), 735–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cresswell, T. (2012). Mobilities II: Still. Progress in Human Geography, 36, 645–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gill, N., Caletrío, J., & Mason, V. (2011). Introduction: Mobilities and forced migration. Mobilities, 6(3), 301–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glick Schiller, N., & Salazar, N. B. (2013). Regimes of mobility across the globe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(2), 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gómez Arévalo, A. P. (2017). Entre la espada y la pared: Movilidad forzada de personas salvadoreñas LGBT. Mediações-Revista de Ciências Sociais, 22(1), 130–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gorman-Murray, A. (2009). Intimate mobilities: Emotional embodiment and queer migration. Social & Cultural Geography, 10(4), 441–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hathaway, J. C. (2007). Forced migration studies: Could we agree just to ‘Date’? Journal of Refugee Studies, 20(3), 349–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Howe, C., Zaraysky, S., & Lorentzen, L. (2008). Transgender sex workers and sexual transmigration between Guadalajara and San Francisco. Latin American Perspectives, 35(1), 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jordan, S. R. (2009). Un/convention (al) refugees: Contextualizing the accounts of refugees facing homophobic or transphobic persecution. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 26(2), 165–182.Google Scholar
  16. Lewis, V. (2012). Volviendo visible lo invisible: hacia un marco conceptual de las migraciones internas trans en México. Cuicuilco, 19(54), 219–240.Google Scholar
  17. Lubkemann, S. C. (2008). Involuntary immobility: On a theoretical invisibility in forced migration studies. Journal of Refugee Studies, 21(4), 454–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Luibhéid, E. (2004). Heteronormativity and immigration scholarship: A call for change. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 10(2), 227–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Luibhéid, E., & Cantú Jr., L. (2005). Queer migrations: Sexuality, US citizenship, and border crossings. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  20. Manalansan, M. F. (2006). Queer intersections: Sexuality and gender in migration studies. International Migration Review, 40(1), 224–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shakhsari, S. (2014). The queer time of death: Temporality, geopolitics, and refugee rights. Sexualities, 17(8), 998–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shamir, R. (2005). Without borders? Notes on globalization as a mobility regime. Sociological Theory, 23(2), 197–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shuman, A., & Bohmer, C. (2014). Gender and cultural silences in the political asylum process. Sexualities, 17(8), 939–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tsing, A. (2005). Friction: An ethnography of global connection. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Wimark, T. (2016). The impact of family ties on the mobility decisions of gay men and lesbians. Gender, Place & Culture, 23(5), 659–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Winton, A. (2017a). Cuerpos disidentes en movimiento: miradas sobre movilidad transgénero desde la frontera sur de México. El Cotidiano, 202, 115–126.Google Scholar
  27. Winton, A. (2017b). Movilidad y Supervivencia: Un estudio exploratorio sobre desplazamiento por violencia en el Norte de Centroamérica y el Sur de México (Research report). Mexico: El Colegio de la Frontera Sur/International Organization for Migration/United Nations High Commission for Refugees.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.El Colegio de la Frontera SurTapachulaMexico

Personalised recommendations