Advertisement

Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy

  • Simon R. Turner
  • Daniela Molena
Chapter

Abstract

Esophagectomy is one of the most potentially morbid procedures in thoracic surgery, and patients with esophageal cancer frequently have multiple comorbidities related to obesity, smoking and/or alcohol use. Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy minimizes surgical morbidity to the patient, while providing oncologic benefit that is equal or superior to open approaches. This allows for better patient outcomes, especially in patients with multiple medical problems. In this chapter we provide our approach to minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, including surgical tips to avoid complications and intraoperative trouble shooting.

Keywords

Esophageal cancer Esophagectomy Minimally invasive Laparoscopy Thoracoscopy Ivor Lewis 

References

  1. 1.
    Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Franchetti Y, Catalano PJ, Swanson S, Sugarbaker DJ, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: results of a prospective phase II multicenter trial-the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E2202) Study. Ann Surg. 2015;261(4):702–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mungo B, Lidor AO, Stem M, Molena D. Early experience and lessons learned in a new minimally invasive esophagectomy program. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:1692–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Litle VR, Buenaventura PO, Luketich JD. Minimally invasive resection for esophageal cancer. Surg Clin North Am. 2002;82(4):711–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Ozawa S, Udagawa H, Osugi H, Matsubara H, et al. Comparison of short-term outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer using a nationwide database in Japan. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(7):1821.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Roig Garcia J, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:1887–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sihag S, Kosinski AS, Gaissert HA, Wright CD, Schipper PH. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison of early surgical outcomes from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:1281–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tapias LF, Mathisen DJ, Wright CD, Wain JC, Gaissert HA, Muniappan A. Outcomes with open and minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:1097–103.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Cuesta MA, Daams F, Roig Garcia J, Bonavina L, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophageal resection: three-year follow-up of the previously reported randomized controlled trial: the TIME trial. Ann Surg. 2017;266(2):232–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Palazzo F, Rosato EL, Chaudhary A, Evans NR, Sedecki JA, Keith S, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides significant survival advantage compared with open or hybrid esophagectomy for patients with cancers of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220(4):672–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maas KW, Cuesta MA, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Roig J, Bonavina L, Rosman C, et al. Quality of life and late complications after minimally invasive compared to open esophagectomy: results of a randomized trial. World J Surg. 2015;39:1986–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Turner SR, Molena D. The role of intraoperative fluorescence imaging during esophagectomy. Thorac Surg Clin. In Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.Thoracic Surgery Service, Department of SurgeryMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations