Advertisement

Movement and Animation

  • Stanton B. GarnerJr.
Chapter
Part of the Cognitive Studies in Literature and Performance book series (CSLP)

Abstract

This chapter (“Movement and Animation”) examines the fundamental structures of self-movement and external movement perception. It considers the centrality of movement to animacy and the perception of animacy in living and non-living elements of one’s environment. Humans have a perceptual predisposition to recognize biological movement and involve themselves kinesthetically with movements that fall within a repertoire of familiar sensorimotor experience. The chapter applies these insights to theatre by exploring the phenomenology of animacy in performing objects and the kinesthetic dynamics of stillness and movement with actors onstage. The sections include discussions of Sandglass Theater’s puppet play about dementia, D-Generation: An Exaltation of Larks; the statue scene in Shakespeare’s The Winter’s Tale; and Samuel Beckett’s Footfalls.

Bibliography

  1. Bass, Eric, Ines Zeller Bass, Kirk Murphy, Roberto Salomon, and Residents of Pine Heights Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation, Brattleboro, Vermont. D-Generation (unpublished typescript dated 15 January 2013).Google Scholar
  2. Basting, Anne Davis. 2005. Dementia and the Performance of Self. In Bodies in Commotion: Disability and Performance, ed. Carrie Sandahl and Philip Auslander, 202–213. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  3. Beckett, Samuel. 2006. Dramatic Works. Grove Centenary Edition, vol. 3. New York: Grove.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, John. 2014. Playing with the Eternal Uncanny: The Persistent Life of Lifeless Objects. In The Routledge Companion to Puppetry and Material Performance, ed. Dassia N. Posner, Claudia Orenstein, and John Bell, 43–52. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bower, T.G.R. 1971. The Object in the World of the Infant. Scientific American 225 (4): 30–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brater, Enoch. 1987. Beyond Minimalism: Beckett’s Late Style in the Theater. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Casey, Edward S. 2007. The World at a Glance. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chouchourelou, Arieta, Alissa Golden, and Maggie Shiffrar. 2013. What Does ‘Biological Motion’ Really Mean? Differentiating Visual Percepts of Human, Animal, and Nonbiological Motions. In People Watching: Social, Perceptual, and Neurophysiological Studies of Body Perception, ed. Kerri L. Johnson and Maggie Shiffrar, 63–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Freud, Sigmund. 2003. The Uncanny. Trans. David McLintock. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  10. Garner, Stanton B., Jr. 1994. Bodied Spaces: Phenomenology and Performance in Contemporary Drama. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gibson, James J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  12. Gielgud, John. 1963. Stage Directions. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  13. Gowitzke, Barbara A., and Morris Milner. 1988. Scientific Bases of Human Movement. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
  14. Gross, Kenneth. 1992. The Dream of the Moving Statue. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2011. Puppet: An Essay on Uncanny Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Husserl, Edmund. 1989. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, Book 2: Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution. Trans. Richard Rojcewicz and André Schuwer. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  17. Jeannerod, Marc. 2006. Motor Cognition: What Actions Tell the Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jentsch, Ernst. 1997. On the Psychology of the Uncanny. 1906. Trans. Roy Sellars. Angelaki 2 (1): 7–16.Google Scholar
  19. Laban, Rudolf. 1966. Choreutics. Annotated and ed. Lisa Ullmann. London: Macdonald and Evans.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 1971. The Mastery of Movement. Revised and enlarged by Lisa Ullmann, 3rd ed. Boston: Plays, Inc.Google Scholar
  21. Landgrebe, Ludwig. 1977. Phenomenology as Transcendental Theory of History. In Husserl: Expositions and Appraisals, ed. Frederick A. Elliston and Peter McCormick. Trans. José Huertas-Jourda and Richard Feige, 101–113. South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lecoq, Jacques. 2002. The Moving Body: Teaching Creative Theatre. Trans. David Bradby. Rev. ed. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  23. Leder, Drew. 1990. The Absent Body. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Luria, Aleksandr R. 1973. The Working Brain: An Introduction to Neuropsychology. Trans. Basil Haigh. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  25. Massumi, Brian. 2002. Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McBurney, Simon. 2002. Foreword. In The Moving Body: Teaching Creative Theatre, by Jacques Lecoq. Trans. David Bradby, ix–x. Revised ed. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  27. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1963. The Structure of Behavior. Trans. Alden L. Fisher. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 2012. Phenomenology of Perception. Trans. Donald A. Landes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Mrázek, Jan. 2005. Phenomenology of a Puppet Theatre: Contemplations on the Art of Javanese Wayang Kulit. Leiden: KITLV Press.Google Scholar
  30. Noë, Alva. 2004. Action in Perception. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Patočka, Jan. 1988. Le monde naturel et le movement de l’existence humaine. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  32. Petit, Jean-Luc. 1999. Constitution by Movement: Husserl in Light of Recent Neurobiological Findings. In Naturalizing Phenomenology: Issues in Contemporary Phenomenology and Cognitive Science, ed. Jean Petitot, Francisco J. Varela, Bernard Pachoud, and Jean-Michel Roy, 220–244. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Pyles, John A., and Emily D. Grossman. 2013. Neural Mechanisms for Biological Motion and Animacy. In People Watching: Social, Perceptual, and Neurophysiological Studies of Body Perception, ed. Kerri L. Johnson and Maggie Shiffrar, 304–317. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Shakespeare, William. 1963. The Winter’s Tale, ed. J. H. P. Pafford. Arden Shakespeare. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  35. ———. 1997. The Riverside Shakespeare, ed. G. Blakemore Evans and J.J.M. Tobin, 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  36. Sheets-Johnstone, Maxine. 2003. Kinesthetic Memory. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum 7 (1): 69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. ———. 2010. Movement: The Generative Source of Spatial Perception and Cognition. In Spatial Cognition, Spatial Perception: Mapping the Self and Space, ed. Francine L. Dolins and Robert W. Mitchell, 323–340. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. ———. 2011. The Primacy of Movement. Expanded second ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  39. Simion, Francesca, Lucia Regolin, and Hermann Bulf. 2008. A Predisposition for Biological Motion in the Newborn Baby. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 (2): 809–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stein, Edith. 1989. On the Problem of Empathy. 1917. 3rd. revised ed. Trans. Waltraut Stein. Vol. 3, The Collected Works of Edith Stein. Washington, DC: ICS.Google Scholar
  41. Straus, Erwin. 1963. The Primary World of Senses: A Vindication of Sensory Experience. Trans. Jacob Needleman. London: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
  42. Veltruský, Jiří. 1983. Puppetry and Acting. Semiotica 47 (1–4): 69–122.Google Scholar
  43. Wordsworth, William. 2014. Wordsworth’s Poetry and Prose. Norton Critical Edition, ed. Nicholas Halmi. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  44. Zeki, S. 1991. Cerebral Akinetopsia (Visual Motion Blindness): A Review. Brain 114 (2): 811–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zihl, J., D. von Cramon, and N. Mai. 1983. Selective Disturbance of Movement Vision After Bilateral Brain Damage. Brain 106 (2): 313–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stanton B. GarnerJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EnglishUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations