Advertisement

The Potentiality of Improvised Explosive Devices to Trigger Domino Effects

  • Ernesto SalzanoEmail author
  • Valerio Cozzani
Conference paper

Abstract

The effect of improvised explosive devices (IED) when used in direct attacks towards individuals may be dramatic. Besides, large uncertainties and few tools are available for the analysis of IED when maliciously used against critical infrastructures or industrial equipment containing large amount of hazardous substances, such as gas pipelines, storage tanks or other equipment, aiming at domino effects. Indeed, the shock waves produced by even large amount of IED cannot be directly analysed by the net equivalent charge of TNT calculated on pure substance or mixtures, because the efficiency of home-made explosives is extremely variable and depends on many often uncontrolled factors, including deterioration. This work analyses the potentiality of low-energetic explosives in causing accident escalation sequences and severe effects on industrial assets.

Keywords

Improvised explosive device Domino effect Security Home-made explosive TNT 

References

  1. 1.
    Department of Homeland Security: IED attack fact sheet: Improvised explosive devices. National Academies (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kuhl, A.L., Oppenheim, A.K.: Turbulent combustion in the self-similar exothermic-flow limit. In: Roy, G.D., Frolov, S.M., Givi, P. (eds.) Advanced computation and analysis of combustion, pp. 388–396. ENAS Publishers, Moscow (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baker, W.E., Cox, P.A., Kulesz, J.J., Strehlow, R.A., Westine, P.S.: Explosion hazards and evaluation. Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL (1983)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ornellas, D.L.: Calorimetric determination of the heat and products of detonation for explosives: October 1961 to April 1982, Report UCRL-52821, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA (1982)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Landucci, G., Reniers, G., Cozzani, V., Salzano, E.: Vulnerability of industrial facilities to attacks with improvised explosives devices aimed at triggering domino scenarios. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 143, 53–62 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Napadensky, S., Swatosh, J.J.: TNT equivalency of black powder. Report J6265-3, IIT Research Institute, Chicago, IL (1972)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Salzano, E., Basco, A.: A comparison of thermodynamic of explosion of TNT and black powder by means of Le Chatelier diagram. Propellants Explos. Pyrotech. 37, 724–731 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Díaz Alonso, F., González Ferradás, E., DovalMiñarro, M., Miñana Aznar, A., Ruiz Gimeno, J., Sánchez Pérez, J.F.: Consequence analysis by means of characteristic curves to determine the damage to buildings from the detonation of explosive substances as a function of TNT equivalence. J. Loss. Prev. Process Ind. 21, 74–81 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cozzani, V., Gubinelli, G., Salzano, E.: Escalation thresholds in the assessment of domino accidental events. J. Hazard. Mater. 129, 1–21 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gordon, S., McBride, B.J.: Computer program for calculation of complex chemical equilibrium compositions and applications. NASA RP1311, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC (1994)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Conwep: Conventional Weapon Effects Programme. US Army Corps of Engineers (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Salzano, E., Basco, A.: Simplified model for the evaluation of the effects of explosions on industrial target. J. Loss. Prev. Process Ind. 37, 119–123 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Chimica, Ambientale e dei MaterialiAlma Mater Studiorum – Università di BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations