Advertisement

First Measurement Using COUNTERFOG Device: Chemical Warfare Agent Scenario

  • Laura Pascual
  • Marta Fernández
  • José Antonio Dominguez
  • Luis Jesús Amigo
  • Karel Mazanec
  • José Luis Pérez
  • Javier QuiñonesEmail author
Conference paper

Abstract

Nowadays, the threat of a terrorist attack with CBRNE (chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosive) agents is very real, as can be seen in the increasing appearance of news related to the use of CWA (chemical warfare agent) in criminal acts. In light of these new threats, there are no countermeasures available that can respond quickly and automatically to mitigate the consequences. Therefore, the need arises to develop new countermeasure systems that will act against CBRNE agents.

In this context, the COUNTERFOG project is proposed as a countermeasure system based on the generation of a fog interacting and counteracting the effects of a dispersion of CBRNE in large public buildings. To increase the effectiveness of the system, depending on the agent, different additives are combined with fog. Additionally, the work presented considers the use of metal oxide nanoparticles and its effect on cleaning an atmosphere contaminated with a CWA surrogates. The COUNTERFOG system helps the subsequent physical deposition of the nanoparticles with the contaminant adsorbed. To assess the influence of the fog and of the nanoparticles, a comprehensive experimental procedure has been developed.

Keywords

CWA CBRNE Fog Nanoparticles Decontamination 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research has been funded by the COUNTERFOG project no. 312804 7th Framework Program of the European Commission.

References

  1. 1.
    Bartelt-Hunt, S.L., Knappe, D.R.U., Barlaz, M.A.: A review of chemical warfare agent simulants for the study of environmental behavior. Crit. Rev. Env. Sci. Tec. 38(2), 112–136 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barlelt-Hunt, S.L., et al.: Fate of chemical agents and toxic industrial chemicals in landfills. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 4219–4225 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Singer, B.C., et al.: Indoor sorption of surrogates for sarin and related nerve agents. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39(9), 3203–3214 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hooijschuur, E.W.J., Kientz, C.E., Brinkman, U.A.T.: Analytical separation techniques for the determination of chemical warfare agents. J. Chromatogr. A. 982, 177–200 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bagalawis, R.L., Carlson, J., Walsh, J.: Quantitative method for the detection of triethyl phosphate in aqueous solutions. U.S. Army Soldier and Biological Chemical Command, Natick, Technical Report NATICK/TR-04/002, Massachusetts (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sharma, N., Kakkar, R.: Recent advancements on warfare agents/metal oxides surface chemistry and their simulation study. Adv. Mat. Lett. 4, 508–521 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wagner, G.W., Chen, Q., Wu, Y.: Reactions of VX, GD, and HD with nanotubular titania. J. Phys. Chem. C. 112, 11901–11906 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim, K., et al.: Destruction and detection of chemical warfare agents. Chem. Rev. 111, 5345–5403 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura Pascual
    • 1
  • Marta Fernández
    • 1
  • José Antonio Dominguez
    • 1
  • Luis Jesús Amigo
    • 1
  • Karel Mazanec
    • 2
  • José Luis Pérez
    • 3
  • Javier Quiñones
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.CIEMATMadridSpain
  2. 2.Institute of Inorganic ChemistryŘežCzech Republic
  3. 3.UAH, Alcalá de HenaresMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations