Advertisement

The Legacy of Initial Regimes and Democratization in New States

  • Thomas Denk
  • Sarah Lehtinen
Chapter
Part of the Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century book series (CDC)

Abstract

This chapter examines the stability and the long-term effects of initial regimes on democratization in the new states. Based on theoretical discussions about path-dependence and critical juncture, Denk and Lehtinen develop a core proposition about the effects of the initial regime on the level of democratization in new states. They expect the mode of initial regimes to be stable over time, but also that the effects of initial regime on democratization in new state decrease with the length of independence. The chapter tests this expectation and the results provide empirical support for the core proposition, showing that initial regimes are stable and have long-term effects on democratization in new states that decrease slowly with time.

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001). The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1369–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J. A., & Yared, P. (2008). Income and Democracy. American Economic Review, 98(3), 808–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Achen, C. (2002). Toward a New Political Methodology: Microfoundations and Art. Annual Review of Political Science, 5, 423–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anckar, C. (2008). Size, Islandness and Democracy: A Global Comparison. International Political Science Review, 29(4), 433–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anckar, C. (2011). Religion and Democracy: A Worldwide Comparison. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Aneshensel, C. S. (2013). Theory-Based Data Analysis for the Social Sciences. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arat, Z. F. (1988). Democracy and Development: Modernization Theory Revisited. Comparative Politics, 21(1), 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arthur, W. B. (1994). Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barro, R. J. (1999). Determinants of Democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 107(6), 158–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bennett, A., & Elman, C. (2006). Complex Causal Relation and Case Study Methods: The Example of Path Dependence. Political Analysis, 14(3), 250–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bernhard, M., Reenock, C., & Nordstrom, T. (2004). The Legacy of Western Overseas Colonialism on Democratic Survival. International Studies Quarterly, 48(1), 225–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Binder, L., Coleman, J. S., LaPalombara, J., Pye, L. W., Verba, S., & Weiner, M. (1971). Crises and Sequences in Political Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Boix, C. (2011). Democracy, Development, and the International System. American Political Science Review, 105(4), 809–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bollen, K. A., & Jackman, R. W. (1985). Political Democracy and the Size Distribution of Income. American Sociological Review, 50(4), 438–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2006). Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analysis. Political Analysis, 14(1), 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brinks, D., & Coppedge, M. (2006). Diffusion Is No Illusion: Neighbor Emulation in the Third Wave of Democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 39(4), 463–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Burkhardt, R. E., & Lewis-Beck, M. (1994). Comparative Democracy: The Economic Development Thesis. American Political Science Review, 88(4), 903–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Capoccia, G. (2015). Critical Junctures and Institutional Change. In J. Mahoney & K. Thelen (Eds.), Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis (pp. 147–179). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Capoccia, G., & Kelemen, D. R. (2007). The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism. World Politics, 59(3), 341–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Capoccia, G., & Ziblatt, D. (2010). The Historical Turn in Democratization Studies: A New Research Agenda for Europe and Beyond. Comparative Political Studies, 43(8), 931–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cheibub, J. A., Gandhi, J., & Vreeland, J. R. (2010). Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited. Public Choice, 143(1), 67–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Collier, R. B., & Collier, D. (1991). Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Coppedge, M. (2012). Democratization and Research Methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dahl, R. A., & Tufte, E. R. (1973). Size and Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75(2), 332–337.Google Scholar
  26. David, P. A. (2001). Path Dependence, Its Critics and the Quest for ‘Historical Economics’. In P. Garrouste & S. Ioannides (Eds.), Evolution and Path Dependence in Economic Ideas (pp. 15–40). Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  27. Denk, T., & Anckar, C. (2014). Length of Independence and Democratic Failure. Contemporary Politics, 20(4), 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Diamond, L. (1992). Economic Development and Democracy Reconsidered. In G. Mark & L. Diamond (Eds.), Reexamining Democracy: Essays in Honour of Seymour Martin Lipset (pp. 115–144). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  29. Diamond, L. (1999). Developing Democracy: Towards Consolidation. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  30. DiPalma, G. (1990). To Craft Democracies: An Essay on Democratic Transitions. Berkeley: University of Californian Press.Google Scholar
  31. Doorenspleet, R. (2005). Democratic Transitions: Exploring the Structural Sources of the Fourth Wave. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  32. Easton, D. (1965). A System Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. Epstein, D., Bates, R., Goldstone, J., Kristensen, I., & O’Halloran, S. (2006). Democratic Transitions. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 551–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fearon, J., & Laitin, D. (2003). Ethnicity, Insurgency and Civil War. American Political Science Review, 97(1), 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fukuyama, F. (2004). State-Building: Governance and World Order in the 21st Century. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Fukuyama, F. (2014). Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  37. Gassebner, M., Lamla, M. J., & Vreeland, J. R. (2012). Extreme Bounds of Democracy. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 57(2), 171–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gleditsch, K. S., & Ward, M. D. (2006). Diffusion and the International Context of Democratization. International Organization, 60(4), 911–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hadenius, A. (1992). Democracy and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Huntington, S. P. (1991). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  42. Kapstein, E. B., & Converse, N. (2008). The Fate of Young Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Keele, L. J., & Kelly, N. J. (2006). Dynamic Models for Dynamic Theories: The Ins and Outs of LDVs. Political Analysis, 14(2), 186–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kennedy, P. (2008). A Guide to Econometrics (6th ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  45. Lehtinen, S. (2014). Demokratins förutsättningar vid staters självständighet. En studie om politiska regimer i nybildade stater. Åbo: Åbo Akademis förlag.Google Scholar
  46. Lehtinen, S. (2017). Determinants of Initial Regimes: Comparative Analyses of the Conditions for Democratisation at the Time of Independence. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University.Google Scholar
  47. Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lipset, S. M., Kyoung-Ryung, S., & Torres, J. C. (1993). A Comparative Analysis of the Social Requisites of Democracy. International Social Science Journal, 45(1), 154–175.Google Scholar
  50. Lipset, S. M., & Rokkan, S. (1967). Cleavage Structures, Party Systems and Voter Alignments: An Introduction. In S. M. Lipset & S. Rokkan (Eds.), Party Systems and Voter Alignments (pp. 1–64). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  51. Mahoney, J. (2000). Path Dependence in Historical Sociology. Theory and Society, 29(4), 507–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mahoney, J. (2001). Path Dependent Explanations of Regime Change: Central America in Comparative Perspective. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36(1), 111–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mahoney, J., & Schensul, D. (2006). Historical Context and Path Dependence. In R. E. Goodin & C. Tilly (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis (pp. 454–471). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Minkenberg, M. (2007). Democracy and Religion: Theoretical and Empirical Observations on the Relationship between Christianity, Islam and Liberal Democracy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33(6), 887–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Muller, E. N. (1995). Economic Determinants of Democracy. American Sociological Review, 60(4), 966–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Newitt, M. (1992). Introduction. In H. M. Hintjens & M. Newitt (Eds.), The Political Economy of Small Tropical Islands: The Importance of Being Small (pp. 1–17). Exeter: University of Exeter Press; Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  57. O’Donnell, G., & Schmitter, P. C. (1986). Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions About Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  58. O’Loughlin, J., Ward, M. D., Lofdahl, C. L., Cohen, J. S., Brown, D. S., Reilly, D., et al. (1998). The Diffusion of Democracy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88(4), 545–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Olsson, O. (2009). On the Democratic Legacy of Colonialism. Journal of Comparative Economics, 37(4), 534–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ott, D. (2000). Small is Democratic: An Examination of State Size and Democratic Development. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  61. Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2009). Democratic Capital: The Nexus of Political and Economic Change. American Economic Journal, 1(3), 88–126.Google Scholar
  62. Pevehouse, J. (2002). Democracy from the Outside-In? International Organizations and Democratization. International Organizations, 56(3), 515–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pevehouse, J. (2005). Democracy from Above: Regional Organizations and Democratization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton Press University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Przeworski, A., & Limongi, F. (1997). Modernization: Theories and Facts. World Politics, 49(2), 155–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M., Cheibub, J. A., & Limongi, F. (2000). Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rose, R., Mishler, W., & Haerpfer, C. (1998). Democracy and Its Alternatives: Understanding Post-Communist Societies. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Ross, M. L. (2001). Does Oil Hinder Democracy? World Politics, 53(3), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rost, N., & Booth, J. A. (2008). Determinants of Regime Type in Newly Independent States. European Journal of Political Research, 47(5), 635–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rueschemeyer, D. (2005). Building States—Inherently a Long-Term Process? An Argument from Theory. In M. Lange & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), States and Development: Historical Antecedents of Stagnation and Advance (pp. 143–164). New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rustow, D. (1970). Transition to Democracy. Comparative Politics, 2(3), 337–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Soifer, H. D. (2012). The Causal Logic of Critical Junctures. Comparative Political Studies, 45(12), 1572–1597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Starr, H. (1991). Democratic Dominoes. Diffusion Approaches to the Spread of Democracy in the International System. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35(2), 356–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Starr, H., & Lindborg, C. (2003). Democratic Dominoes Revisited: The Hazards of Government Transition, 1975–1996. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 47(4), 490–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stoner, K., & McFaul, M. (2013). Transitions to Democracy: A Comparative Perspective. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Teorell, J. (2010). Determinants of Democratization: Explaining Regime Change in the World, 1972–2006. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Thelen, K. (2003). How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative Historical Analysis. In J. Mahoney & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), Comparative Historical Analysis in Social Science (pp. 208–240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. United Nations. (2018, April 16). Standard Country or Area Codes and Geographical Regions for Statistical Use. Available at https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/.
  80. Vanhanen, T. (2003). Democratization: A Comparative Analysis of 170 Countries. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  81. Wejnert, B. (2005). Diffusion, Development, and Democracy, 1800–1999. American Sociological Review, 70(1), 53–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wejnert, B. (2014). Diffusion of Democracy: The Past and Future of Global Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Wooldridge, J. (2008). Introductory Econometrics: Modern Approach (4th ed.). San Diego: Southwestern Collage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceÖrebro UniversityÖrebroSweden
  2. 2.The Swedish National Council for Crime PreventionStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations