Advertisement

Usability Test of WYRED Platform

  • Francisco J. García-PeñalvoEmail author
  • Alicia García-Holgado
  • Andrea Vázquez-Ingelmo
  • Antonio M. Seoane-Pardo
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10924)

Abstract

WYRED (netWorked Youth Research for Empowerment in the Digital society) is a European H2020 Project that aims to provide a framework for research in which children and young people can express and explore their perspectives and interests in relation to digital society, but also a platform from which they can communicate their perspectives to other stakeholders effectively through innovative engagement processes. It will do this by implementing a generative research cycle involving networking, dialogue, participatory research and interpretation phases centered around and driven by children and young people, out of which a diverse range of outputs, critical perspectives and other insights will emerge to inform policy and decision-making in relation to children and young people’s needs in relation to digital society. The WYRED Platform is already developed, but the target group, young people, should accept it to ensure project aims. This paper presents the usability test done to evolve the Platform.

Keywords

Human interaction Usability analysis Digital society Youth Citizen science Communication networks Technological ecosystems 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research work has been carried out within the University of Salamanca PhD Programme on Education in the Knowledge Society scope (http://knowledgesociety.usal.es) and was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport under a FPU fellowship (FPU014/04783).

With the support of the EU Horizon 2020 Programme in its “Europe in a changing world – inclusive, innovative and reflective Societies (HORIZON 2020: REV-INEQUAL-10-2016: Multi-stakeholder platform for enhancing youth digital opportunities)” Call. Project WYRED (netWorked Youth Research for Empowerment in the Digital society) (Grant agreement No 727066). The sole responsibility for the content of this webpage lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union. The European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.

This work has been partially funded also by the Spanish Government Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness throughout the DEFINES project (Ref. TIN2016-80172-R).

References

  1. 1.
    García-Peñalvo, F.J., Rodríguez-Conde, M.J., Seoane-Pardo, A.M., Conde-González, M.A., Zangrando, V., García-Holgado, A.: GRIAL (GRupo de investigación en InterAcción y eLearning), USAL. IE Comunicaciones: Revista Iberoamericana de Informática Educativa 85–94 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    García-Peñalvo, F.J., Kearney, N.A.: Networked youth research for empowerment in digital society: the WYRED project. In: García-Peñalvo, F.J. (ed.) Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM 2016), Salamanca, Spain, 2–4 November 2016, pp. 3–9. ACM, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    García-Peñalvo, F.J.: The WYRED Project: a Technological platform for a generative research and dialogue about youth perspectives and interests in digital society. J. Inf. Technol. Res. 9, vi-x (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    García-Holgado, A., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: The evolution of the technological ecosystems: an architectural proposal to enhancing learning processes. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM 2013), Salamanca, Spain, 14–15 November 2013, pp. 565–571. ACM, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    García-Holgado, A., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Architectural pattern to improve the definition and implementation of eLearning ecosystems. Sci. Comput. Program. 129, 20–34 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    García-Peñalvo, F.J., García-Holgado, A. (eds.): Open Source Solutions for Knowledge Management and Technological Ecosystems. IGI Global, Hershey (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    García-Holgado, A., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Preliminary validation of the metamodel for developing learning ecosystems. In: Dodero, J.M., Ibarra Sáiz, M.S., Ruiz Rube, I. (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM 2017), Cádiz, Spain, 18–20 October 2017. ACM, New York (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    García-Holgado, A., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Architectural pattern for the definition of eLearning ecosystems based on Open Source developments. In: Sierra-Rodríguez, J.L., Dodero-Beardo, J.M., Burgos, D. (eds.) Proceedings of 2014 International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE), Logroño, La Rioja, Spain, 12–14 November 2014, pp. 93–98. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. IEEE Catalog Number CFP1486T-ART (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    García-Holgado, A., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: A metamodel proposal for developing learning ecosystems. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds.) LCT 2017. LNCS, vol. 10295, pp. 100–109. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58509-3_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    García-Peñalvo, F.J., Durán-Escudero, J.: Interaction design principles in WYRED platform. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds.) LCT 2017. LNCS, vol. 10296, pp. 371–381. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58515-4_29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Ministerio de Educación Cultura y Deporte: Datos y cifras del sistema universitario español. Curso 2015/2016. Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brooke, J.: SUS: a retrospective. J. Usability Stud. 8, 29–40 (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tullis, T.S., Stetson, J.N.: A comparison of questionnaires for assessing website usability. In: Usability Professional Association Conference, pp. 1–12 (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bangor, A., Kortum, P.T., Miller, J.T.: An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 24, 574–594 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brooke, J.: SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. In: Usability Evaluation in Industry, vol. 189, pp. 4–7 (1996)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    McKinney, W.: pandas: a foundational Python library for data analysis and statistics. In: Python for High Performance and Scientific Computing, pp. 1–9 (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bangor, A., Kortum, P., Miller, J.: Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. J. Usability Stud. 4, 114–123 (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sauro, J.: A Practical Guide to the System Usability Scale: Background, Benchmarks & Best Practices. Measuring Usability LLC, Denver (2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vázquez-Ingelmo, A.: Code repository that supports the analysis in the paper. Usability test of WYRED Platform (2018)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lewis, J.R., Sauro, J.: The factor structure of the system usability scale. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCD 2009. LNCS, vol. 5619, pp. 94–103. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02806-9_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francisco J. García-Peñalvo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alicia García-Holgado
    • 1
  • Andrea Vázquez-Ingelmo
    • 1
  • Antonio M. Seoane-Pardo
    • 1
  1. 1.GRIAL Research Group, Research Institute for Educational SciencesUniversity of SalamancaSalamancaSpain

Personalised recommendations