Victims, Villains, and the Virtuous

  • Jennifer K. LobaszEmail author
Part of the Human Rights Interventions book series (HURIIN)


This chapter returns to the importance of recognizing human trafficking as a social construct. It emphasizes that one of the reasons debates surrounding human trafficking are so contentious is to the recognition—often implicit—that the manner in which trafficking and its subjects are represented has real repercussions at the level of policy and service delivery. The chapter further elaborates on the argument that attempts to deny or ignore the social construction of human trafficking, and its inextricably political nature are themselves political acts that serve to shut down debate and delegitimate opposing viewpoints. The chapter then turns to the feminist, critical constructive theoretical perspective offered in the book, and the need for empathetic listening. Finally, the chapter concludes with a meditation on potential ways in which debates surrounding human trafficking might be reconfigured.


  1. Agustín, Laura María. Sex at the Margins: Migration, Labor Markets, and the Rescue Industry. London: Zed Books, 2007.Google Scholar
  2. Aradau, Claudia. Rethinking Trafficking in Women: Politics out of Security. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berman, Jacqueline. “The Left, the Right, and the Prostitute: The Making of U.S. Anti-trafficking in Persons Policy.” Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law 14 (2005–2006): 269–93.Google Scholar
  4. Bernstein, Elizabeth. “The Sexual Politics of the ‘New Abolitionism’.” Differences 18, no. 3 (2007): 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertone, Andrea M. “Transnational Activism to Combat Trafficking in Persons.” Brown Journal of World Affairs 10, no. 2 (Winter/Spring 2004): 9–22.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, Chris. “‘Turtles All the Way Down’: Anti-foundationalism, Critical Theory and International Relations.” Millennium, no. 23 (June 1994): 213–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, Wendy. States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  8. Brysk, Alison. “Sex as Slavery? Understanding Private Wrongs.” Human Rights Review 12, no. 3 (2011): 259–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Busby, Joshua William. “Bono Made Jesse Helms Cry: Jubilee 2000, Debt Relief, and Moral Action in International Politics.” International Studies Quarterly 51, no. 2 (2007): 247–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Butler, Judith. “Imitation and Gender Insubordination.” In Inside/Out, edited by Diana Fuss. New York: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
  11. DeRogatis, Amy. “‘Born Again Is a Sexual Term’: Demons, STDs, and God’s Healing Sperm.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 77, no. 2 (2009): 275–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52, no. 4 (1998): 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gejdenson, Sam. Remarks on Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. House of Representatives, 2000.Google Scholar
  14. Joachim, Jutta. “Framing Issues and Seizing Opportunities: The UN, NGOs, and Women’s Rights.” International Studies Quarterly 47 (2003): 247–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Keck, Margaret E., and Kathryn Sikkink. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  16. Kempadoo, Kamala, and Jo Doezema, eds. Global Sex Workers: Rights, Resistance, and Redefinition. New York: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar
  17. Laffey, Mark, and Jutta Weldes. “Beyond Belief: Ideas and Symbolic Technologies in the Study of International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 3, no. 2 (1997): 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leidholdt, Dorchen A. “Demand and the Debate.” Coalition against Trafficking in Women. Accessed September 29, 2009.
  19. Locher, Birgit. Trafficking in Women in the European Union: Norms, Advocacy-Networks and Policy-Change 1. Aufl. ed. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2007. Thesis (doctoral)—Universität Bremen, 2002.Google Scholar
  20. Nadelmann, Ethan A. “Global Prohibition Regimes: The Evolution of Norms in International Society.” International Organization 44, no. 4 (Autumn 1990): 479–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Scott, Joan Wallach. “Deconstructing Equality Versus Difference, or, the Uses of Poststructuralist Theory for Feminism.” In Feminist Social Thought: A Reader, edited by Diana Tietjens Meyers, 758–70. New York: Routledge, 1988.Google Scholar
  22. Smith, Christopher H. Remarks on Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. House of Representatives, 2000.Google Scholar
  23. Subcommittee on International Operations and Human Rights of the Committee on International Relations. H.R. 1356, the Freedom from Sexual Trafficking Act of 1999, Markup, 1st session, 106th Congress, August 4, 1999.Google Scholar
  24. Subcommittee on International Operations and Human Rights of the Committee on International Relations. Hearing on Trafficking of Women and Children in the International Sex Trade, 106th Cong. 1st session, September 14, 1999.Google Scholar
  25. Weldes, Jutta. “Bureaucratic Politics: A Critical Constructivist Assessment.” Mershon International Studies Review 42, no. 2 (November 1998): 216–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political Science and International RelationsUniversity of DelawareWilmingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations