Advertisement

Being in Ethical Relation: Competence and Collaborative Cultures

  • Fiona Bannon
Chapter

Abstract

The discussion begins by visiting Pascal Gielen’s (2014) considerations of situational ethics as a form of artistic ecology. Speaking of the habits of artists in ‘… creating life in creative repetitions’, we can recognise explorations that embrace the nature of differential experiences. It is through these explorations of the social relations that exist and the opportunities that arise that we can appreciate the roles that artists offer as narrators and/or interpreters of our future imaginings.

Bibliography

  1. Alix, C., Dobson, E. and Wilsmore, R. (2011). Collaborative art practices in He: Mapping and developing pedagogical models | Higher Education Academy. [online] Heacademy.ac.uk. Available at: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/collaborative-art-practices-he-mapping-and-developingpedagogical-models [Accessed 16 Dec. 2017].
  2. Allsopp, R. (2007). Taking flight. In: U. Melzwig, M. Spångberg and N. Thielicke, ed., Reverse engineering education in dance, choreography and the performing arts: Follow-up reader for MODE05, 1st ed. Berlin: B-books, pp. 110–116.Google Scholar
  3. Allsopp, R. (2013). Something else: On latency and composition. In: J. da Silva, E. Gallier and K. Georgelou, ed., Inventing futures. Amsterdam: ArtEZ Press, pp. 23–32.Google Scholar
  4. Bellah, R. N. (1998). Community properly understood: A defense of ‘democratic communitarianism’. In: A. Etzioni, ed., The essential communitarian reader. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 15–20.Google Scholar
  5. Bergson, H. and Mitchell, A. (1911). Creative evolution. General Books LLC.Google Scholar
  6. Bourriaud, N., Pleasance, S., Woods, F. and Copeland, M. (2009). Relational aesthetics. France: Presses du réel.Google Scholar
  7. Bruner, E. (1993). Epilogue: Creative persona and the problem of authenticity. In: S. Lavie, K. Narayan and R. Rosaldo, ed., Creativity/anthropology. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Buber, M. (1958). I and thou. New York: Scribers.Google Scholar
  9. Combes, M. (2013). Gilbert Simondon and the philosophy of the transindividual. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Deleuze, G. (1990). Expressionism in philosophy (trans. Martin Joughin). Massachusetts: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  11. Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition (trans. Paul Patton). London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  12. Deleuze. G. (2001). Spinoza: Practical philosophy. City Lights Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Deleuze. G. and Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus. University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  14. Deleuze, G. and Parnet, C. (1987). Dialogues. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Deleuze, G., Guattari, F. and Massumi, B. (2011). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC.Google Scholar
  16. Deleuze, G., Guattari, F., Tomlinson, H. and Burchell, G. (1994). What is philosophy?. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Dewey, J. (1931). Philosophy and civilization. New York: Minton, Balch & Company.Google Scholar
  18. Dewey, John. (1988). The middle works of John Dewey, Vol. 14. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dewey, J. (2000). Experience and nature. New York: Dover Publ. Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Dissanayake, E. (1992). Homo aestheticus: Where art comes from and why. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  21. Etchells, T. (1999). Performing questions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  23. Georgelou, K., Gallier, E. and Silva, J. (2013). Inventing futures: Doing and thinking artistic research with(in) the master of choreography programme of ArtEZ Institute of the arts, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  24. Gherardi, S. (2001). From organizational learning to practice-based knowing. Human Relations, 54(1), pp. 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gielen, P. (2014). Situational ethics: An artistic ecology. In: P. Gielen and C. Guy, ed., The ethics of art ecological turns in the performing arts, 1st ed. Amsterdam: Valiz, pp. 17–40.Google Scholar
  26. Greene, M. (1978). Landscapes of learning. 6th ed. New York: Teachers’ College Press.Google Scholar
  27. Greene, M. (1995). Notes on the search for coherence. In: J. Beane, ed., Towards a coherent curriculum, 1st ed. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, pp. 139–145.Google Scholar
  28. Guattari, F. (1995). Chaosmosis: An ethico-aesthetic paradigm (trans. P. Bains & J. Pefanis). Sydney: Power Publications.Google Scholar
  29. Guattari, F. (2000). Three ecologies. New Brunswick, NJ: Athlone.Google Scholar
  30. Howes, D. (1991). The varieties of sensory experience. Toronto [u.a.].: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  31. Howes, D. (2005). Empire of the senses. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  32. Jabri, V. (1998). Restyling the subject of responsibility in international relations. Millennium, 27(3), pp. 591–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. John-Steiner, V. (2006). Creative collaboration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jonas, H. (2000). The imperative of responsibility. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kimball-Mentzos, N. and Stark-Smith, N. (2013). “You have to find a way…” issues in contact improvisation and ballet. In: E. Boxberger and G. Wittman, ed., Partnering documentation: Approaching dance, heritage, culture. München: e-podium, pp. 104–115.Google Scholar
  36. Laermans, R. (2015). Moving together: Making and theorizing contemporary dance. Amsterdam: Valiz.Google Scholar
  37. Midgley, M. (2004). The myths we live by. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Oliver, K. (2001). Witnessing. 1st ed. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.Google Scholar
  39. Rancière, J. and Corcoran, S. (2015). Dissensus. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  40. Roche, J. (2011). Embodying multiplicity: The independent contemporary dancer’s moving identity. Research in Dance Education, 12(2), pp. 105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rothfield, P. (2015a). Dancing in the dark, Spinoza’s ethics of the body. [online] DANCEHOUSE DIARY. Available at: http://www.dancehousediary.com.au/?cat=708 [Accessed 10 Apr. 2017].
  42. Rothfield, P. (2015b). The ethics of intervention. [online] Dancehousediary.com.au. Available at: http://www.dancehousediary.com.au/?p=2981 [Accessed 12 Apr. 2017].
  43. Rouhiainen, L. (2012). From body psychotherapy to a performative installation environment: A collaborating Performer’s point of view. In: S. Ravn and L. Rouhiainen, ed., Dance spaces: Practices of movement, 1st ed. Copenhagen: University of Southern Denmark, pp. 137–160.Google Scholar
  44. Schenck, David. (1986). The texture of embodiment: Foundation for medical ethics. Human Studies, 9, pp. 43–54.Google Scholar
  45. Siegesmund, R. (2004). Somatic knowledge and qualitative reasoning: From theory to practice. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 38(4), pp. 80–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Siegmund, G. and Hölscher, S. (2013). Dance, politics & co-immunity. Zürich: diaphanes.Google Scholar
  47. Wenger, E. (2010). Communities of practice and social learning systems: The career of a Concept. In: C. Blackmore, ed., Social learning systems and communities of practice. London: Springer-Verlag, pp. 125–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fiona Bannon
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations