Inhabiting Thought: Humanising Pedagogy

  • Fiona Bannon


The chapter considers the ways in which we draw upon our cognitive and sensory experiences in terms of knowledge generation and dissemination. A consequence of seeking to forge merged human relations is our need to learn to interpret situations within the context of dialogic experiences. When creating performance, we work through interrelating scenarios, seeking ways to arrange emerging and relating ideas in material forms. What the discussion particularly focuses on are the ways that choices are made between individuals working in groups and the principles that inform the social realities of their shared practice. These attributes are grounded in an appreciation for the role of aesthetics and ethics in our ways of being critically engaged in learning.


  1. Abbs, P. (Ed.). (1989). The symbiotic order. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allsopp, R. (2007). Taking flight. In: U. Melzwig, M. Spångberg and N. Thielicke, ed., Reverse engineering education in dance, choreography and the performing arts: Follow-up reader for MODE05, 1st ed. Berlin: B-books, pp. 110–116.Google Scholar
  3. Arnold, P. J. (2000). Aspects of the dancer’s role in the art of dance. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(1), pp. 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ash, J. and Gallagher, L. (2015). Becoming attuned: Objects, affects, and embodied methodology. In: M. Perry and C. Medina, ed., Methodologies of embodiment: Inscribing bodies in qualitative research. New York: Routledge, pp. 69–85.Google Scholar
  5. Bannon, F. (2012). Relational ethics: Dance, touch and learning. [online] Higher Education Academy. Available at: [Accessed 27 Jul. 2017].
  6. Bellah, R. N. (1998). Community properly understood: A defense of ‘democratic communitarianism’. In: A. Etzioni, ed., The essential communitarian reader. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 15–20.Google Scholar
  7. Berleant, A. (1986). Experience and theory in aesthetics. In: M. Mitias, ed., Experience and theory in aesthetics, 1st ed. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 91–106.Google Scholar
  8. Berleant, A. (1991). Art and engagement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Berleant, A. (2002). The aesthetic field: A phenomenology of aesthetic experience. Auckland, NZ: Cybereditions.Google Scholar
  10. Bohm, D. (1996). On creativity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Braidotti, R. (2002). Metamorphoses: Towards a feminist theory of becoming. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bristow, A. and Esper, J. (1988). A feminist research ethos. In: Nebraska sociological feminist collective. A feminist ethic for social science research. Lewiston/New York: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
  13. Broudy, H. (1972). Enlightened cherishing. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  14. Burton, J., Horowitz, R. and Abeles, H. (2000). Learning in and through the arts: The question of transfer. Studies in Art Education, 41(3), pp. 228–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cixous, H. and Calle-Gruber, M. (1997). Rootprints. Memory and life writing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Cools, G. (2014). The art of listening. In: G. Cools and P. Gielen, ed., The ethics of art ecological turns in the performing arts. Amsterdam: Valiz.Google Scholar
  17. Crawford, Donald W. (1987). Aesthetics in discipline-based art education. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 21(2), pp. 227–239.Google Scholar
  18. Csordas, T. (1999). Embodiment and cultural phenomenology. In: G. Weiss and H. Haber, ed., Perspectives on embodiment, the intersection of nature and culture. New York/London: Routledge, pp. 143–162.Google Scholar
  19. Deleuze, G. (1988). Spinoza: Practical philosophy. San Francisco: City Lights Books.Google Scholar
  20. Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. New York: Henry Holt Co.Google Scholar
  22. Dewey, J. (1931). Philosophy and civilization. New York: Minton, Balch & Company.Google Scholar
  23. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. New York and Boston: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
  24. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Minton.Google Scholar
  25. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education.New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  26. Dewey, J. 1938 (1963). Experience and education. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
  27. Dissanayake, E. (1988). What is art for?, 1st ed. Washington: University of Washington.Google Scholar
  28. Dissanayake, E. (1992). Homo aestheticus: Where art comes from and why. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  29. Eisner, E. (1982). Cognition and curriculum: A basis for deciding what to teach. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  30. Ellsworth, E. (2005). Places of learning. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  31. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  32. Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault. University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  33. Foucault, M., Hurley, R. and Rabinow, P. (1997). Ethics: Subjectivity and truth: Essential works of Michel Foucault: Vol 1. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  34. Greene, M. (1978). Landscapes of learning. 6th ed. New York: Teachers’ College Press.Google Scholar
  35. Greene, M. (1988). The dialectic of freedom landscapes of learning. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  36. Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies: Towards a corporeal feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Grosz, E. (2008). Chaos, territory, art. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Gutting, G. (2005). Foucault: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Halprin, A. (1995). Moving toward life: Five decades of transformational dance. Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Hickey-Moody, A. and Malins, P. (2008). Deleuzian encounters. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  41. Howes, D. (1991). The varieties of sensory experience. Toronto [u.a.].: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  42. Jonas, H. (2000). The imperative of responsibility. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  43. Kaprow, A. and Kelley, J. (2003). Essays on the blurring of art and life. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  44. Keats, J. (1888). John Keats – “The chameleon poet” – Letter to Richard Woodhouse, October 27th, 1818. [online] Genius. Available at: [Accessed 22 Oct. 2017].
  45. Kreuger, A. (2012). Thinking about thinking together. In: P. Gielen and P. De Bruyne, ed., Teaching art in the neoliberal realm. Realism versus cynicism. Amsterdam: Valiz, pp. 165–178.Google Scholar
  46. Laermans, R. (2012). Disciplining thought vs. nimble thinking possible stakes of teaching theory. In: P. Gielen and P. De Bruyne, ed., Teaching art in the neoliberal realm. Realism versus cynicism. Amsterdam: Valiz, pp. 145–162.Google Scholar
  47. Lessing, D. (1994). Under my skin. Volume One of my autobiography, to 1949.Google Scholar
  48. Maturana, H. (1991). Science and daily life: The ontology of scientific explanations. In: F. Steier, ed., Research and reflexivity, 1st ed. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (trans. C. Smith). New York: The Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  50. Rabinow, P. (1997). Ethics: Subjectivity and truth. 1st ed. New York: New Press, pp. 303–319.Google Scholar
  51. Reid, L. A. (1969a). Aesthetics and education. APWCPE Conference report; physical education; aesthetic and social aspects.Google Scholar
  52. Reid, L. A. (1969b). Meaning in the arts. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  53. Reid, L. (1982). The Concept of aesthetic development. In: M. Ross, ed., The development of aesthetic experience. London: Pergamon Press, pp. 2–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Reimer, B. (1992). What knowledge is of most worth in the arts?. In: B. Reimer and R. A. Smith, ed., The arts education and aesthetic knowing 91 yearbook of the national society for the study of education: Part Two. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 20–50.Google Scholar
  55. Rinaldi. (2006). In dialogue with Reggio Emilia: Listening, researching and learning. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Robinson. (2013). The element: How finding your passion changes everything. London: Viking BooksGoogle Scholar
  57. Scheff, T. J. (1990). Microsociology discourse, emotion and social structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  58. Schenck, D. (1986). The texture of embodiment: Foundation for medical ethics. Human Studies, 9, pp. 43–54.Google Scholar
  59. Schutz, A. (1967). On multiple realities. In: M. Natanson, ed., The problem of social reality, collected papers 1. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  60. Schutz, A. (1973). Collected papers: I the problem of social reality. 4th ed. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  61. Siegesmund, R. (2004). Somatic knowledge and qualitative reasoning: From theory to practice. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 38(4), pp. 80–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Smith, R. A. (1992). Toward percipience: A humanities curriculum for arts education. In: B. Reimer and R. A. Smith, ed., The arts education and aesthetic knowing 91 yearbook of the national society for the study of education: Part Two. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 51–69.Google Scholar
  63. Spencer, H. (1896). Education: Intellectual, moral and physical. New York: D, Appleton. Cited in Reimer, B. and Smith, R. A. (Eds.). (1992). The arts education and aesthetic knowing 91 yearbook of the national society for the study of education: Part Two. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 20–49.Google Scholar
  64. Spinoza, B. (2008). The ethics. New York: BiblioLife.Google Scholar
  65. Von Schiller, F. (1795). On the aesthetic education of man (trans. E. W. Wilkinson & L. A Willoughby). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Wallace, David Foster. (2009). This is water some thoughts, delivered on a significant occasion, about living a compassionate life. New York: Little, Brown & Company.Google Scholar
  67. Wallace, David Foster. (2013). This is water: Commencement speech to Kenyon College class of 2005. Written and presented by David Foster Wallace. Published 19 May 2013.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fiona Bannon
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations