Advertisement

The Three Levels of Wisdom

  • Tuomo Peltonen
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter develops the framework of wisdom that will be applied in the later empirical sections of the book. The framework contains three distinct but interrelated levels of wisdom that are called rational-analytical information, intuitive-experiential knowledge and philosophical wisdom. The first, rational-analytical information, produces knowledge on the basis of a rational decision-making model, often relying on formal techniques such as the cost-benefit analysis in economics. The second, intuitive-experiential understanding, proceeds from a more holistic reflection of the situation that employs intuitive insights to re-evaluate and enrich the outcomes of the rational analytics. Intuition is conceptualised as a set of embodied, emotionally charged and immediate flashes of insight and comprehension that emerge without conscious thinking or deliberate analysis. Noting some shortcomings in the discussions related to the ontology of intuition, the chapter then moves to outline the most wide-ranging level of wisdom, namely the Platonic-Socratic understanding of wisdom, or, sophia. Plato’s view on transcendental universals, or Forms, is used to build a perspective that equates wisdom with knowing and becoming familiar with the unchanging ultimates such as Truth, Beauty, Justice and Good. Plato’s metaphors like the Divided Line and the Cave, as well as the theory of the Philosopher-King are explained as part of the doctrine of philosophical wisdom. A brief discussion on the organisational structures and processes facilitating and inhibiting the pursuit of wisdom is presented, with a focus on bureaucracy, groupthink and new organisational forms. Finally, the chapter discusses the adaptation of the three-level framework for the analysis of empirical cases, arguing for a more Socratic understanding of philosophical wisdom as learned ignorance in the reading of the strategic decision-making examples.

Keywords

Rational model Intuition Plato Socrates Wisdom Groupthink 

Bibliography

  1. Abrahamson, E. (1996). Management fashion. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 254–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackoff, R. L. (1989). From data to wisdom. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 16(1), 3–9.Google Scholar
  3. Alvesson, M. (2002). Understanding organizational culture. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arendt, H. (1973). The origins of totalitarianism (Vol. 244). New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  5. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  6. Barker, E. (2012). The political thought of Plato and Aristotle. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Belbin, R. M. (2012). Team roles at work. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2005). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  10. Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4(1), 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chia, R., & Morgan, S. (1996). Educating the philosopher-manager: De-signing the times. Management Learning, 27(1), 37–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collingwood, R. G. (1994). The idea of history. London: Oxford University.Google Scholar
  13. Cox, J. W., & Hassard, J. (2007). Ties to the past in organization research: A comparative analysis of retrospective methods. Organization, 14(4), 475–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dane, E., & Pratt, M. G. (2007). Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Rus, G. (2010). Introduction to cost-benefit analysis: Looking for reasonable shortcuts. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. de Vaus, D. (2001). Research design in social research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Dean, J. W., & Sharfman, M. P. (1996). Does decision process matter? A study of strategic decision-making effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 368–392.Google Scholar
  18. Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology (G. C. Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  19. Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dreyfus, H. L. (1979). What computers can’t do: The limits of artificial intelligence (Vol. 1972). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  21. Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (2005). Peripheral vision: Expertise in real world contexts. Organization Studies, 26(5), 779–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Zbaracki, M. J. (1992). Strategic decision making. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S2), 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ericsson, K. A., Prietula, M. J., & Cokely, E. T. (2007). The making of an expert. Harvard Business Review, 85(7/8), 114.Google Scholar
  24. Feldman, M. S., & March, J. G. (1981). Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(2), 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge: Translated from the French by AM Sheridan Smith. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  26. Foucault, M. (1983). The subject and power. Afterword. In H. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208–228). Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Foucault, M. (1997). Ethics: Subjectivity and truth. Essential works of Michel Foucault, 1954–1984 (Vol. 1., P. Rabinow, Ed., & Trans. R. Hurley et al.). London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  28. Frantz, R. (2003). Herbert Simon. Artificial intelligence as a framework for understanding intuition. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(2), 265–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Friedman, H. L., & Hartelius, G. (Eds.). (2015). The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of transpersonal psychology. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  30. Gabriel, Y. (2000). Storytelling in organizations: Facts, fictions, and fantasies: Facts, fictions, and fantasies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Gavetti, G., Levinthal, D., & Ocasio, W. (2007). Perspective—Neo-Carnegie: The carnegie school’s past, present, and reconstructing for the future. Organization Science, 18(3), 523–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Golden, B. R. (1992). The past is the past—Or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 848–860.Google Scholar
  33. Griffin, E. (1997). Groupthink of Irving Janis. In E. Griffin (Ed.), A first look at communication theory (pp. 235–246). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  34. Hadot, P. (1995). Philosophy as a way of life: Spiritual exercises from Socrates to Foucault (M. Chase, Trans., AI Davidson, Intro. & Ed.). London: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  35. Huber, G. P., & Power, D. J. (1985). Retrospective reports of strategic-level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strategic Management Journal, 6(2), 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Isenberg, D. J. (1984). How senior managers think. Harvard Business Review. November–December 1984, 81–90.Google Scholar
  37. Isenberg, D. J. (1986). Thinking and managing: A verbal protocol analysis of managerial problem solving. Academy of Management Journal, 29(4), 775–788.Google Scholar
  38. Jackall, R. (1988). Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Janis, I. L. (1971). Groupthink. Psychology Today, 5(6), 43–46.Google Scholar
  40. Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink; a psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin.Google Scholar
  41. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  42. Kahneman, D., & Klein, G. (2009). Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. American Psychologist, 64(6), 515–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  44. Kokko, H. (2010). Sivistyksen varhaista käsitehistoriaa [Early conceptual history of civilization] (in Finnish). Kasvatus & Aika, 4(4), 7–23.Google Scholar
  45. Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  46. Kunda, G., & Ailon-Souday, G. (2005). Managers, markets and ideologies: Design and devotion revisited. In S. Ackroyd, R. Batt, P. Thompson, & P. S. Tolbert (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of work and organization (pp. 200–219). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Langley, A., Mintzberg, H., Pitcher, P., Posada, E., & Saint-Macary, J. (1995). Opening up decision making: The view from the black stool. Organization Science, 6(3), 260–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  49. Malkiel, B. G. (2003). The efficient market hypothesis and its critics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Malliaris, A. G., Shaw, L., & Shefrin, H. (Eds.). (2016). The global financial crisis and its aftermath: Hidden factors in the meltdown. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Manz, C. C., & Neck, C. P. (1995). Teamthink: Beyond the groupthink syndrome in self-managing work teams. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 10(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683949510075155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P., Jr. (1982). The potential for “groupthink” in autonomous work groups. Human Relations, 35(9), 773–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. March, J. G. (1997). Understanding how decisions happen in organizations. In Z. Shapira (Ed.), Organizational decision making (pp. 9–32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Maslow, A. H. (1954). Personality and motivation (p. 987). Harlow, England: Longman, 1.Google Scholar
  55. Maslow, A. H. (1962). Lessons from the peak-experiences. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 2(1), 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McAfee, A., Brynjolfsson, E., Davenport, T. H., Patil, D. J., & Barton, D. (2012). Big data: The management revolution. Harvard Business Review, 90(10), 60–68.Google Scholar
  57. Merton, R. K. (1949). On sociological theories of the middle range. In K. Robert (Ed.), Merton: Social theory and social structure (pp. 39–53). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster/The Free Press.Google Scholar
  58. Moorhead, G., Ference, R., & Neck, C. P. (1991). Group decision fiascoes continue: Space shuttle challenger and a revised groupthink framework. Human Relations, 44(6), 539–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Morgan, G. (2006). Images of organization. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  60. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press, 3(4–5), 25–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)80234-X.
  61. Noro, A. (2000). Aikalaisdiagnoosi sosiologisen teorian kolmantena lajityyppinä [Contemporary diagnosis as a third genre in sociological theory] (in Finnish). Sosiologia, 37(4), 321–329.Google Scholar
  62. Nykänen, M. & Salminen, M. (2014). Operaatio Elop. [Operation Elop] (in Finnish). Helsinki: Teos.Google Scholar
  63. Ollila, J., & Saukkomaa, H. (2013). Mahdoton menestys: kasvun paikkana Nokia [Impossible success: Nokia as a place for growth]. (in Finnish). Helsinki: Otava.Google Scholar
  64. O’reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organisation. Harvard Business Review, 82(4), 74–81.Google Scholar
  65. Peltonen, T. (2016). Organization theory: Critical and philosophical engagements. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Peters, T. J., & Waterman, R. H. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from America’s best-run companies. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  67. Pettigrew, A. M., & Fenton, E. M. (2000). The innovating organization. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  68. Plato. (1993). Republic. Translated with an Introduction and Notes by R. Waterford. Oxford.Google Scholar
  69. Powell, W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552003000200016.
  70. Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2009). This time is different eight centuries of financial folly. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Rooney, D., & McKenna, B. (2007). Wisdom in organizations: Whence and whither. Social Epistemology, 21(2), 113–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rowley, J. (2007). The wisdom hierarchy: Representations of the DIKW hierarchy. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ryan, S. (2014). Wisdom. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2014 ed.). URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/wisdom/ (read 1.4.2018).
  74. Sadler-Smith, E., Hodgkinson, G. P., & Sinclair, M. (2008). Chapter 2: A matter of feeling? The role of intuition in entrepreneurial decision-making and behavior. In Emotions, ethics and decision-making (pp. 35–55). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sadler-Smith, E., & Sparrow, P. (2008). Intuition in organizational decision making. In The Oxford handbook of organizational decision making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Simon, H. A. (1947/1976). Administrative behavior (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  77. Simon, H. A. (1987). Making management decisions: The role of intuition and emotion. Academy of Management Perspectives, 1(1), 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sinclair, M., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2005). Intuition: Myth or a decision-making tool? Management Learning, 36(3), 353–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Staw, B. M. (1981). The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 577–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Takala, T. (1998). Plato on leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(7), 785–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Tsoukas, H., & Knudsen, C. (2003). The Oxford handbook of organization theory: Meta-theoretical perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Van Buren, H. J. (2003). Boundaryless careers and employability obligations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(2), 131–149+263.Google Scholar
  83. Weber, M. (1968). The theory of economic and social organization (A. Henderson & T. Parsons, Trans.). New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  84. Whittington, R. (2001). What is strategy-and does it matter? London: Cengage Learning EMEA.Google Scholar
  85. Willmott, H. (1993). Strength is ignorance; slavery is freedom: Managing culture in modern organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 30(4), 515–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1993.tb00315.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tuomo Peltonen
    • 1
  1. 1.School of BusinessAalto UniversityHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations