Advertisement

Early Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting

  • Nasser Nadjmi
Chapter

Abstract

The aim of the reconstruction of clefting of the maxilla and alveolus is to close the residual nasoalveolar fistula, reconstruct the bony cleft defect involving the alveolar ridge, maxilla, and piriform aperture. The cleft of the alveolar process is mainly reconstructed by secondary grafting using the autogenous cancellous bone and marrow. This stabilizes the maxillary arch and adjacent teeth, thereby facilitating eruption of elements adjusted to the alveolar cleft and enabling orthodontic and restorative treatment. Furthermore, it leads to an improvement of facial morphology by elevation of the alar base [1–5]. In case of bilateral cleft lip and palate, an added benefit of bone graft reconstruction is stabilization of an often mobile premaxillary segment. The author prefers to perform an early secondary bone grafting (ESBG) between the age of 5 and 6, even if the lateral incisor is not present. In these cases, the central incisor is often bordering the cleft, and ESBG will provide adequate periodontal support to this area. The other advantage of ESBG is to provide enough support for the often-seen supernumerary tooth adjusted to the cleft border of the lesser maxillary segment, which could replace the missing lateral incisor.

References

  1. 1.
    Enemark H, Krantz-Simonsen E, Schramm JE. Secondary bone grafting in unilateral cleft lip palate patients: indications and treatment procedure. Int J Oral Surg. 1985;14:2–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boyne PJ, Sand ND. Combined orthodontic-surgical management of residual palato-alveolar cleft defects. Am J Orthod. 1976;70:20–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bergland O, Semb G, Abyhollm F. Elimination of the residual alveolar cleft by the secondary bone grafting and subsequent orthodontic treatment. Cleft Palate J. 1986;23:175–205.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Felstead AM, Deacon S, Revington PJ. The outcome for secondary alveolar bone grafting in the South West UK region post-CSAG. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2010;47:359–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lilja J. Alveolar bone grafting. Indian J Plast Surg. 2009;42(suppl):S110–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Johanson B, Rockert H. Human autogenous bone grafts. I. Microradiographic study of grafts to the hard palate in clefts. Preliminary report. Acta Chir Scand. 1961;122:101–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vura N, Reddy KR, Sudhir R, Rajasekhar G, Kaluvala VR. Donor site evaluation: anterior iliac crest following secondary alveolar bone grafting. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;2627(2630):7.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Millard DR. Cleft craft: the evolution of its surgery. Boston: Little Brown; 1980.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boyne PJ, Sands NR. Secondary bone grafting of residual alveolar and palatal clefts. J Oral Surg. 1972;30(2):87–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    WC S, Semb G. Current approaches to the orthodontic management of cleft lip and palate. J R Soc Med. 1990;83(1):30–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Laurie SW, Kaban LB, Mulliken JB, Murray JE. Donor-site morbidity after harvesting rib and iliac bone. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984;73(6):933–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nasser Nadjmi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial SurgeryUniversity of Antwerp, University Hospital Antwerp, ZMACK AssociationAntwerpBelgium

Personalised recommendations